Cancer Detection Rates of Systematic and Targeted Prostate Biopsies after Biparametric MRI.

IF 2.3 Q3 ONCOLOGY Prostate Cancer Pub Date : 2020-04-03 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/4626781
Maudy C W Gayet, Anouk A M A van der Aa, Harrie P Beerlage, Bart Ph Schrier, Maaike Gielens, Roel Heesakkers, Gerrit J Jager, Peter F A Mulders, Hessel Wijkstra
{"title":"Cancer Detection Rates of Systematic and Targeted Prostate Biopsies after Biparametric MRI.","authors":"Maudy C W Gayet,&nbsp;Anouk A M A van der Aa,&nbsp;Harrie P Beerlage,&nbsp;Bart Ph Schrier,&nbsp;Maaike Gielens,&nbsp;Roel Heesakkers,&nbsp;Gerrit J Jager,&nbsp;Peter F A Mulders,&nbsp;Hessel Wijkstra","doi":"10.1155/2020/4626781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare prostate cancer detection rates (CDRs) and pathology results with targeted prostate biopsy (TB) and systematic prostate biopsy (SB) in biopsy-naive men.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An in-patient control study of 82 men undergoing SB and subsequent TB in case of positive prostate MRI between 2015 and 2017 in the Jeroen Bosch Hospital, the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prostate cancer (PCa) was detected in 54.9% with 70.7% agreement between TB and SB. Significant PCa (Gleason score ≥7) was detected in 24.4%. The CDR with TB and SB was 35.4% and 48.8%, respectively (<i>p</i>=0.052). The CDR of significant prostate cancer with TB and SB was both 20.7%. Clinically significant pathology upgrading occurred in 7.3% by adding TB to SB and 22.0% by adding SB to TB.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is no statistically significant difference between CDRs of SB and TB. Both SB and TB miss significant PCas. Moreover, pathology upgrading occurred more often by adding SB to TB than vice versa. This indicates that the omission of SB in this study population might not be justified.</p>","PeriodicalId":20907,"journal":{"name":"Prostate Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/4626781","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4626781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: To compare prostate cancer detection rates (CDRs) and pathology results with targeted prostate biopsy (TB) and systematic prostate biopsy (SB) in biopsy-naive men.

Methods: An in-patient control study of 82 men undergoing SB and subsequent TB in case of positive prostate MRI between 2015 and 2017 in the Jeroen Bosch Hospital, the Netherlands.

Results: Prostate cancer (PCa) was detected in 54.9% with 70.7% agreement between TB and SB. Significant PCa (Gleason score ≥7) was detected in 24.4%. The CDR with TB and SB was 35.4% and 48.8%, respectively (p=0.052). The CDR of significant prostate cancer with TB and SB was both 20.7%. Clinically significant pathology upgrading occurred in 7.3% by adding TB to SB and 22.0% by adding SB to TB.

Conclusions: There is no statistically significant difference between CDRs of SB and TB. Both SB and TB miss significant PCas. Moreover, pathology upgrading occurred more often by adding SB to TB than vice versa. This indicates that the omission of SB in this study population might not be justified.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双参数MRI后系统和靶向前列腺活检的癌症检出率。
目的:比较前列腺活检(TB)和系统前列腺活检(SB)对前列腺癌的检出率和病理结果。方法:对荷兰Jeroen Bosch医院2015年至2017年前列腺MRI阳性的82名接受SB和随后的TB的男性进行住院对照研究。结果:前列腺癌(PCa)检出率为54.9%,TB与SB检出率为70.7%,显著性PCa (Gleason评分≥7)检出率为24.4%。合并TB和SB的CDR分别为35.4%和48.8% (p=0.052)。显著性前列腺癌合并TB和SB的CDR均为20.7%。在TB和TB中分别加入SB和SB的病例中,有临床意义的病理升级的病例分别为7.3%和22.0%。结论:SB与TB的cdr差异无统计学意义。SB和TB都错过了重要的PCas。此外,将SB添加到TB中比将SB添加到TB中更容易发生病理升级。这表明在本研究人群中遗漏SB可能是不合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prostate Cancer
Prostate Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Prostate Cancer is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a multidisciplinary platform for scientists, surgeons, oncologists and clinicians working on prostate cancer. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the diagnosis, surgery, radiotherapy, drug discovery and medical management of the disease.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Second-Line Treatment for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer following the Administration of Upfront Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors. Prostate Cancer Detection from MRI Using Efficient Feature Extraction with Transfer Learning Alterations of Sexual and Erectile Functions after Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer Based on Patient-Reported Questionnaires Health-Related and Psychosocial Factors Associated with Prostate Cancer Stage at Diagnosis among Males Participating in Alberta’s Tomorrow Project Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients Treated with Androgen Deprivation Therapy: A Multimodality Functional Imaging Study to Evaluate Neuroinflammation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1