[Molecular Epidemiology of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by POT Method, Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns, and Toxin-Producing Types].

Hitoshi Miyamoto, Shinobu Murakami, Mina Saito, Minami Tamaki, Chiaki Ochi, Miyako Iyoda
{"title":"[Molecular Epidemiology of Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) by POT Method, Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns, and Toxin-Producing Types].","authors":"Hitoshi Miyamoto,&nbsp;Shinobu Murakami,&nbsp;Mina Saito,&nbsp;Minami Tamaki,&nbsp;Chiaki Ochi,&nbsp;Miyako Iyoda","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The PCR-based open reading frame typing (POT) is an important method for analyzing outbreak information. Many institutions use POT as a molecular epidemiological method for analyzing horizontal transmission in methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA). However, typing and analyzing MRSA only based on POT, with high detection frequency, has some limitations. In this study, we analyzed 62 strains of MRSA, isolated at Ehime University Hospital between January 2018 to December 2018 based on six POT types, toxin type, and antimicrobial susceptibility. Types of POT and strains used were as follows: 106-183-37 (28 strains), 106-137-80 (7 strains), 106-77-113 (7 strains), 106-9-80 (7 strains), 70-18-81 (7 strains), 106-247-33 (6 strains). Based on antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, 5 types of MRSA were detected, including types susceptible to gentamicin (GM), clarithromycin (CAM), and levofloxacin (LVFX). Strains belonging to the same POT type, showed differential antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and had different toxin productivity. These findings suggest that the combination of POT method with antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and toxin type may be a useful technique for MRSA typing.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"29 2","pages":"45-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The PCR-based open reading frame typing (POT) is an important method for analyzing outbreak information. Many institutions use POT as a molecular epidemiological method for analyzing horizontal transmission in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, typing and analyzing MRSA only based on POT, with high detection frequency, has some limitations. In this study, we analyzed 62 strains of MRSA, isolated at Ehime University Hospital between January 2018 to December 2018 based on six POT types, toxin type, and antimicrobial susceptibility. Types of POT and strains used were as follows: 106-183-37 (28 strains), 106-137-80 (7 strains), 106-77-113 (7 strains), 106-9-80 (7 strains), 70-18-81 (7 strains), 106-247-33 (6 strains). Based on antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, 5 types of MRSA were detected, including types susceptible to gentamicin (GM), clarithromycin (CAM), and levofloxacin (LVFX). Strains belonging to the same POT type, showed differential antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and had different toxin productivity. These findings suggest that the combination of POT method with antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and toxin type may be a useful technique for MRSA typing.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[用POT方法研究耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的分子流行病学、耐药性模式和产毒类型]。
基于pcr的开放阅读框分型(POT)是分析爆发信息的重要方法。许多机构使用POT作为分子流行病学方法分析耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的水平传播。然而,仅基于POT进行MRSA分型和分析,检测频率高,存在一定的局限性。在这项研究中,我们根据6种POT类型、毒素类型和抗菌药物敏感性分析了2018年1月至2018年12月在爱媛大学医院分离的62株MRSA。使用的POT类型和菌株分别为:106-183-37(28株)、106-137-80(7株)、106-77-113(7株)、106-9-80(7株)、70-18-81(7株)、106-247-33(6株)。根据药敏类型,共检出5种MRSA,包括对庆大霉素(GM)、克拉霉素(CAM)和左氧氟沙星(LVFX)敏感的类型。属于同一POT类型的菌株表现出不同的抗菌药敏模式和不同的毒素产量。这些结果提示,将POT方法与抗生素敏感性模式和毒素类型相结合可能是一种有用的MRSA分型技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Japanese Case of COVID-19 Caused by Omicron Strain with Y453F Substitution. [Evaluation of Methicillin Resistance Determination Time for MRSA Using Fully Automated Rapid Identification Susceptibility testing system RAISAS S4]. [Evaluation of the Clinical Validity of the Clostridioides difficile Nucleic Acid Detection Kit "Smart Gene® CD ToxinB"]. [Relationship between Serotypes and Biotypes of Yersinia enterocolitica and the Names of Identified Bacteria in the Microbial Identification and Susceptibility Testing Devices]. Comparison of Microorganism Detection, Time to Positivity, and Time-Dependent Shift in Viable Bacterial Count from VersaTREK and BacT/ALERT 3D Blood Culture Systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1