Analyzing outcomes of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment for borderline-resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the perioperative period at an academic institution.

Annals of Pancreatic Cancer Pub Date : 2020-03-01 Epub Date: 2020-03-09 DOI:10.21037/apc.2020.02.01
Alejandro Recio-Boiles, Jessica Vondrak, Summana Veeravelli, James J Mancuso, Kathylynn Saboda, Denise J Roe, Irbaz Bin Riaz, Aaron J Scott, Emad Elquza, Ali McBride, Hani M Babiker
{"title":"Analyzing outcomes of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment for borderline-resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the perioperative period at an academic institution.","authors":"Alejandro Recio-Boiles, Jessica Vondrak, Summana Veeravelli, James J Mancuso, Kathylynn Saboda, Denise J Roe, Irbaz Bin Riaz, Aaron J Scott, Emad Elquza, Ali McBride, Hani M Babiker","doi":"10.21037/apc.2020.02.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Only 15-20% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients are upfront surgical candidates at presentation, and for this cohort of patients, the 5-year survival is a mere 20% despite adjuvant therapy. Previous data indicate that in clinical practice most of these cases are \"borderline-resectable,\" and there is currently no mature data on perioperative treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective electronic chart review of patients with \"borderline-resectable\"PDAC treated at an academic comprehensive cancer center, dividing them into groups based on surgery alone, surgery plus neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or neoadjuvant plus adjuvant perioperative treatment groups. The objectives were to determine the median overall survival (mOS), progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Statistical analysis was performed to assess the association of demographic, tumor traits, and interventions with OS, PFS and DFS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only surgery followed by adjuvant therapy showed an increase in mOS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.22; 95% CI, 0.09-0.51; P<0.001), after adjustment for radiation (yes <i>vs.</i> no), resection margins (R0 <i>vs.</i> R1 or R2), and tumor location (head <i>vs.</i> body or tail). Patients who received adjuvant therapy after surgery had 2.1 times greater odds to be alive at 24 months after diagnosis than those who had surgery alone (P=0.015). PFS and DFS were not statistically significantly different among treatment groups after adjustment. Those whose disease was located in the head of the pancreas had a significantly improved OS (HR =0.27; 95% CI, 0.11-0.64; P=0.003), PFS (HR =0.40; 95% CI, 0.17-0.94; P=0.035), and DFS (HR =0.30; 95% CI, 0.13-0.67; P=0.004). Negative margins led to a significant improvement in PFS (HR =0.30; 95% CI, 0.16-0.57; P<0.001) and DFS (HR =0.30; 95% CI, 0.16-0.57; P<0.001). Those who received radiation had a non-significantly improved OS, PFS, and DFS (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study corroborated that patients treated with adjuvant therapy after surgical resection had an mOS benefit as reported on prior phase III clinical trials. Patients with \"borderline-resectable\" pancreatic cancer are encouraged to participate in a clinical trial or clinically be treated with adjuvant therapy until more mature results from the ongoing perioperative prospective study are available.</p>","PeriodicalId":8372,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pancreatic Cancer","volume":"3 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7170377/pdf/nihms-1578846.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pancreatic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/apc.2020.02.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Only 15-20% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients are upfront surgical candidates at presentation, and for this cohort of patients, the 5-year survival is a mere 20% despite adjuvant therapy. Previous data indicate that in clinical practice most of these cases are "borderline-resectable," and there is currently no mature data on perioperative treatment.

Methods: We performed a retrospective electronic chart review of patients with "borderline-resectable"PDAC treated at an academic comprehensive cancer center, dividing them into groups based on surgery alone, surgery plus neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or neoadjuvant plus adjuvant perioperative treatment groups. The objectives were to determine the median overall survival (mOS), progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Statistical analysis was performed to assess the association of demographic, tumor traits, and interventions with OS, PFS and DFS.

Results: Only surgery followed by adjuvant therapy showed an increase in mOS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.22; 95% CI, 0.09-0.51; P<0.001), after adjustment for radiation (yes vs. no), resection margins (R0 vs. R1 or R2), and tumor location (head vs. body or tail). Patients who received adjuvant therapy after surgery had 2.1 times greater odds to be alive at 24 months after diagnosis than those who had surgery alone (P=0.015). PFS and DFS were not statistically significantly different among treatment groups after adjustment. Those whose disease was located in the head of the pancreas had a significantly improved OS (HR =0.27; 95% CI, 0.11-0.64; P=0.003), PFS (HR =0.40; 95% CI, 0.17-0.94; P=0.035), and DFS (HR =0.30; 95% CI, 0.13-0.67; P=0.004). Negative margins led to a significant improvement in PFS (HR =0.30; 95% CI, 0.16-0.57; P<0.001) and DFS (HR =0.30; 95% CI, 0.16-0.57; P<0.001). Those who received radiation had a non-significantly improved OS, PFS, and DFS (P>0.05).

Conclusions: Our study corroborated that patients treated with adjuvant therapy after surgical resection had an mOS benefit as reported on prior phase III clinical trials. Patients with "borderline-resectable" pancreatic cancer are encouraged to participate in a clinical trial or clinically be treated with adjuvant therapy until more mature results from the ongoing perioperative prospective study are available.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析一家学术机构在围手术期对边缘可切除胰腺腺癌进行新辅助治疗和辅助治疗的效果。
背景:只有15%-20%的胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者在就诊时适合先期手术治疗,尽管进行了辅助治疗,但这部分患者的5年生存率仅为20%。以往的数据表明,在临床实践中,这些病例中的大多数都是 "边缘可切除",目前还没有关于围手术期治疗的成熟数据:方法:我们对在一家学术综合癌症中心接受治疗的 "边缘可切除 "PDAC 患者进行了回顾性电子病历审查,根据单纯手术组、手术加新辅助治疗组、辅助治疗组或新辅助治疗加辅助治疗围手术期治疗组将患者分为几组。目的是确定中位总生存期(mOS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和无病生存期(DFS)。统计分析评估了人口统计学、肿瘤特征和干预措施与OS、PFS和DFS的关系:结果:只有手术后接受辅助治疗的患者的mOS[危险比(HR)0.22;95% CI,0.09-0.51;Pvs.no]、切除边缘(R0 vs. R1或R2)和肿瘤位置(头部 vs. 体部或尾部)均有所增加。术后接受辅助治疗的患者在确诊后24个月内存活的几率是单纯手术患者的2.1倍(P=0.015)。经调整后,各治疗组的 PFS 和 DFS 在统计学上无明显差异。病变位于胰腺头部的患者的OS(HR=0.27;95% CI,0.11-0.64;P=0.003)、PFS(HR=0.40;95% CI,0.17-0.94;P=0.035)和DFS(HR=0.30;95% CI,0.13-0.67;P=0.004)均有明显改善。阴性边缘可显著改善PFS(HR=0.30;95% CI,0.16-0.57;P0.05):我们的研究证实,正如之前的III期临床试验所报告的那样,手术切除后接受辅助治疗的患者可获得mOS益处。我们鼓励 "边缘可切除 "胰腺癌患者参加临床试验或接受辅助治疗,直到正在进行的围手术期前瞻性研究得出更成熟的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Resolution of a rare case of hypercalcemia in a PTHrp-producing pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor using selective internal radiation therapy with 90Y microspheres Role of neoadjuvant therapy in resectable pancreatic carcinoma: a review article Quantitative assessment of pancreatic exocrine function in symptomatic patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer receiving radiation therapy Causal relationship between gut microbiota and pancreatic cancer: a two-sample Mendelian randomisation study Pancreatic cancer with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis: case report and review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1