E-health. Patterns of use and perceived benefits and barriers among people living with HIV (PLHIV) and their physicians – Part 3: Telemedicine and collection of computerized personal information

C. Jacomet , F. Linard , J. Prouteau , C. Lambert , R. Ologeanu-Taddei , P. Bastiani , P. Dellamonica
{"title":"E-health. Patterns of use and perceived benefits and barriers among people living with HIV (PLHIV) and their physicians – Part 3: Telemedicine and collection of computerized personal information","authors":"C. Jacomet ,&nbsp;F. Linard ,&nbsp;J. Prouteau ,&nbsp;C. Lambert ,&nbsp;R. Ologeanu-Taddei ,&nbsp;P. Bastiani ,&nbsp;P. Dellamonica","doi":"10.1016/j.medmal.2020.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the patterns of use and perceived benefits and barriers among people living with HIV and their physicians concerning telemedicine and the collection of computerized personal information.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Multicenter online observational survey from October 15 to 19, 2018.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Study participation was accepted by 229 physicians and 838/1,377 PLHIV followed in 46 centers, of which 325 (39%) responded online. We found that while 226/302 (75%) PLHIV accept online prescription renewals and 197/302 (65%) accept online medical certificates, 182/302 (60%) PLHIV<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->who were more often in material/social deprivation (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.70<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.45; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.045), less often born in Île-de-France (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.43<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.15; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.018), with lower CD4 T-cell counts (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.999<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.0004; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.038), and less often on psychiatric treatment (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.50<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.18; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.047)<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->were receptive to teleconsultations. However, 137/225 (61%) physicians would be uncomfortable teleconsulting due to inadequate data security without it reducing the number of consultations or offering economic benefit. Asked about collection of computerized personal information, 197/296 (67%) PLHIV and 139/223 (62%) physicians agreed it improved quality of care, but 144 (49%) PLHIV and 94/222 (42%) physicians thought it was not sufficiently framed by the law. eHealth was seen as improving coordination between health professionals by 240/296 (81%) PLHIV and seen as a good thing by 181/225 (81%) physicians.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>More than half of PLHIV were ready for telemedicine. PLHIV and physicians endorsed the advantage of e-health in terms of better coordination across health professionals but mistrust the data collection factor, which warrants either clarification or stronger legal protections.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18464,"journal":{"name":"Medecine et maladies infectieuses","volume":"50 7","pages":"Pages 590-596"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.medmal.2020.04.009","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine et maladies infectieuses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0399077X2030113X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the patterns of use and perceived benefits and barriers among people living with HIV and their physicians concerning telemedicine and the collection of computerized personal information.

Methods

Multicenter online observational survey from October 15 to 19, 2018.

Results

Study participation was accepted by 229 physicians and 838/1,377 PLHIV followed in 46 centers, of which 325 (39%) responded online. We found that while 226/302 (75%) PLHIV accept online prescription renewals and 197/302 (65%) accept online medical certificates, 182/302 (60%) PLHIV  who were more often in material/social deprivation (OR = 1.70 ± 0.45; P = 0.045), less often born in Île-de-France (OR = 0.43 ± 0.15; P = 0.018), with lower CD4 T-cell counts (OR = 0.999 ± 0.0004; P = 0.038), and less often on psychiatric treatment (OR = 0.50 ± 0.18; P = 0.047)  were receptive to teleconsultations. However, 137/225 (61%) physicians would be uncomfortable teleconsulting due to inadequate data security without it reducing the number of consultations or offering economic benefit. Asked about collection of computerized personal information, 197/296 (67%) PLHIV and 139/223 (62%) physicians agreed it improved quality of care, but 144 (49%) PLHIV and 94/222 (42%) physicians thought it was not sufficiently framed by the law. eHealth was seen as improving coordination between health professionals by 240/296 (81%) PLHIV and seen as a good thing by 181/225 (81%) physicians.

Conclusion

More than half of PLHIV were ready for telemedicine. PLHIV and physicians endorsed the advantage of e-health in terms of better coordination across health professionals but mistrust the data collection factor, which warrants either clarification or stronger legal protections.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
E-health。艾滋病毒感染者(PLHIV)及其医生的使用模式和感知的益处和障碍。第3部分:远程医疗和计算机化个人信息的收集
目的评价艾滋病毒感染者及其医生在远程医疗和计算机化个人信息收集方面的使用模式、获益和障碍。方法2018年10月15 - 19日进行多中心在线观察调查。结果有229名医生接受了这项研究,46个中心的838/ 1377名PLHIV患者接受了随访,其中325名(39%)在线回复。结果发现,226/302(75%)和197/302(65%)的PLHIV患者接受在线处方更新,182/302(60%)的PLHIV患者更常处于物质/社会剥夺状态(OR = 1.70±0.45;P = 0.045), Île-de-France出生人数较少(OR = 0.43±0.15;P = 0.018), CD4 t细胞计数较低(OR = 0.999±0.0004;P = 0.038),精神科治疗较少(OR = 0.50±0.18;P = 0.047) -接受远程咨询。然而,137/225(61%)的医生对远程咨询感到不舒服,因为数据安全性不足,没有减少咨询次数或提供经济效益。当被问及计算机化个人信息的收集时,197/296(67%)的PLHIV医生和139/223(62%)的医生同意它提高了护理质量,但144(49%)的PLHIV医生和94/222(42%)的医生认为它没有充分的法律框架。240/296(81%)的艾滋病毒感染者认为电子卫生保健改善了卫生专业人员之间的协调,181/225(81%)的医生认为电子卫生保健是一件好事。结论半数以上的感染者已做好远程医疗的准备。艾滋病规划署和医生赞同电子保健在卫生专业人员之间更好地协调方面的优势,但不相信数据收集因素,这需要澄清或加强法律保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medecine et maladies infectieuses
Medecine et maladies infectieuses 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10.7 weeks
期刊介绍: L''organe d''expression de la Société de Pathologie Infectieuse de Langue Française (SPILF). Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses is the official publication of the Société de Pathologie Infectieuse de Langue Française (SPILF). Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses is indexed in the major databases: Medline, Web of Science/Clarivate and Scopus. The journal publishes scientific /research articles, general reviews, short communications and letters, in both English and French. The journal welcomes submissions on the various aspects of infectious pathologies and pathogenic agents. Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses focuses on clinical therapeutics, nosocomial infections, biology, prevention, as well as epidemiology and therapeutics.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Implant retention and high rate of treatment failure in hematogenous acute knee and hip prosthetic joint infections PK/PD targets of amikacin and gentamicin in ICU patients Flu vaccine coverage for recommended populations in France Antimicrobial resistance in N’Djamena (Chad): Four-year experience of the French Forward Medical and Surgical Team engaged in the “Barkhane Operation”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1