Single cell sequencing analysis of lizard phagocytic cell populations and their role in tail regeneration

Ricardo Londono , Sean Tighe , Beatrice Milnes , Christian DeMoya , Lina Maria Quijano , Megan L. Hudnall , Joseph Nguyen , Evelyn Tran , Stephen Badylak , Thomas P. Lozito
{"title":"Single cell sequencing analysis of lizard phagocytic cell populations and their role in tail regeneration","authors":"Ricardo Londono ,&nbsp;Sean Tighe ,&nbsp;Beatrice Milnes ,&nbsp;Christian DeMoya ,&nbsp;Lina Maria Quijano ,&nbsp;Megan L. Hudnall ,&nbsp;Joseph Nguyen ,&nbsp;Evelyn Tran ,&nbsp;Stephen Badylak ,&nbsp;Thomas P. Lozito","doi":"10.1016/j.regen.2020.100029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Lizards are the closest relatives of mammals capable of tail regeneration, but the specific determinants of amniote<span><span> regenerative capabilities are currently unknown. Macrophages are phagocytic immune cells<span> that play a critical role in wound healing and tissue regeneration<span> in a wide range of species. We hypothesize that macrophages regulate the process of lizard tail regeneration, and that comparisons with mammalian cell populations will yield insight into the role </span></span></span>phagocytes<span><span><span><span> play in determining an organism's regenerative potential. Single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) was used to profile lizard immune cells and compare with mouse counterparts to contrast cell types between the two species. </span>Treatment with </span>clodronate<span> liposomes<span> effectively inhibited lizard tail stump tissue ablation<span> and subsequent regeneration, and scRNAseq was used to profile changes in lizard immune cell populations resulting from tail amputation as well as identifying specific cell types affected by clodronate treatment. ScRNAseq analysis of lizard bone marrow, peripheral blood, and tissue-resident phagocyte cell populations was used to trace marker progression during macrophage differentiation and activation. These results indicated that lizard macrophages are recruited to tail amputation injuries faster than mouse populations and express high levels of </span></span></span></span>matrix metalloproteinases<span><span> (MMPs). In turn, treatment with MMP inhibitors<span> inhibited lizard tail regeneration. These results provide single cell sequencing data sets for evaluating and comparing lizard and mammalian immune cell populations, and identifying macrophage populations that are critical regulators of lizard tail </span></span>regrowth.</span></span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":94333,"journal":{"name":"Journal of immunology and regenerative medicine","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100029"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.regen.2020.100029","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of immunology and regenerative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468498820300032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Lizards are the closest relatives of mammals capable of tail regeneration, but the specific determinants of amniote regenerative capabilities are currently unknown. Macrophages are phagocytic immune cells that play a critical role in wound healing and tissue regeneration in a wide range of species. We hypothesize that macrophages regulate the process of lizard tail regeneration, and that comparisons with mammalian cell populations will yield insight into the role phagocytes play in determining an organism's regenerative potential. Single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) was used to profile lizard immune cells and compare with mouse counterparts to contrast cell types between the two species. Treatment with clodronate liposomes effectively inhibited lizard tail stump tissue ablation and subsequent regeneration, and scRNAseq was used to profile changes in lizard immune cell populations resulting from tail amputation as well as identifying specific cell types affected by clodronate treatment. ScRNAseq analysis of lizard bone marrow, peripheral blood, and tissue-resident phagocyte cell populations was used to trace marker progression during macrophage differentiation and activation. These results indicated that lizard macrophages are recruited to tail amputation injuries faster than mouse populations and express high levels of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). In turn, treatment with MMP inhibitors inhibited lizard tail regeneration. These results provide single cell sequencing data sets for evaluating and comparing lizard and mammalian immune cell populations, and identifying macrophage populations that are critical regulators of lizard tail regrowth.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蜥蜴吞噬细胞群的单细胞测序分析及其在尾巴再生中的作用
蜥蜴是能够再生尾巴的哺乳动物的近亲,但羊膜再生能力的具体决定因素目前尚不清楚。巨噬细胞是一种吞噬性免疫细胞,在许多物种的伤口愈合和组织再生中起着关键作用。我们假设巨噬细胞调节蜥蜴尾巴再生的过程,并与哺乳动物细胞群进行比较,将深入了解吞噬细胞在决定生物体再生潜力中的作用。单细胞RNA测序(scRNAseq)用于分析蜥蜴的免疫细胞,并与小鼠的对应细胞进行比较,以对比两种物种之间的细胞类型。氯膦酸脂质体治疗可有效抑制蜥蜴尾残端组织消融和随后的再生,scRNAseq用于分析蜥蜴尾截肢后免疫细胞群的变化,以及鉴定受氯膦酸盐治疗影响的特定细胞类型。利用蜥蜴骨髓、外周血和组织常驻吞噬细胞群的ScRNAseq分析来追踪巨噬细胞分化和激活过程中的标志物进展。这些结果表明,蜥蜴巨噬细胞比小鼠群体更快地被招募到尾巴截肢损伤中,并表达高水平的基质金属蛋白酶(MMPs)。反过来,用MMP抑制剂治疗会抑制蜥蜴尾巴的再生。这些结果提供了单细胞测序数据集,用于评估和比较蜥蜴和哺乳动物的免疫细胞群,并鉴定巨噬细胞群是蜥蜴尾巴再生的关键调节因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A decade of progress: Achievements and future challenges for regenerative medicine research in the United Kingdom The past, present, and future promise of pluripotent stem cells The past, present, and future promise of pluripotent stem cells Expanding the horizons of cell-based immunotherapies: CAR-neutrophils Xenotransplantation – has its time finally arrived?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1