Does Intravenous Thrombolysis Influence the Time of Recanalization and Success of Mechanical Thrombectomy during the Acute Phase of Cerebral Infarction?

IF 2 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-04-28 DOI:10.1159/000507119
Guillaume Charbonnier, Louise Bonnet, Benjamin Bouamra, Fabrice Vuillier, Giovanni Vitale, Thierry Moulin, Elisabeth Medeiros De Bustos, Alessandra Biondi
{"title":"Does Intravenous Thrombolysis Influence the Time of Recanalization and Success of Mechanical Thrombectomy during the Acute Phase of Cerebral Infarction?","authors":"Guillaume Charbonnier,&nbsp;Louise Bonnet,&nbsp;Benjamin Bouamra,&nbsp;Fabrice Vuillier,&nbsp;Giovanni Vitale,&nbsp;Thierry Moulin,&nbsp;Elisabeth Medeiros De Bustos,&nbsp;Alessandra Biondi","doi":"10.1159/000507119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is an effective treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion. Recanalization time is a key factor in the treatment of AIS. It has previously been suggested that intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) may be associated with a shorter recanalization time. The aim of our study was to investigate whether IVT or other factors could be associated with shorter or longer MT procedure times.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of a local cohort of patients treated by MT. We collected procedure time (puncture to recanalization and clot visualization to recanalization), demographic data, localization of the thrombus, antithrombotic treatment at arrival, IVT infusion, and stroke subtype at discharge according to the TOAST classification. We planned to analyze the full cohort and the successful revascularization subgroup.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference in procedure times between patients who received IVT and those who did not. In the successful revascularization subgroup, patients presenting with cardioembolic stroke had a significantly shorter time between clot visualizations and revascularization than the other patients (41 vs. 56 min, p = 0.024), but this was not the case in the full cohort. Also in the successful revascularization subgroup, the revascularization time was 76 vs. 61 min (p = 0.075) in patients presenting with tandem occlusion vs. the others, but there was no difference between these groups in the full cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no difference in terms of procedure times in patients treated by IVT and MT vs. patients treated by MT alone either in the full cohort or in the successful revascularization subgroup. The data from the successful revascularization subgroup may be useful for studying revascularization times, provided that data from procedures that were stopped prematurely by the operator due to the length of time since symptom onset is removed.</p>","PeriodicalId":45709,"journal":{"name":"Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra","volume":"10 1","pages":"28-35"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000507119","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000507119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objectives: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is an effective treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion. Recanalization time is a key factor in the treatment of AIS. It has previously been suggested that intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) may be associated with a shorter recanalization time. The aim of our study was to investigate whether IVT or other factors could be associated with shorter or longer MT procedure times.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a local cohort of patients treated by MT. We collected procedure time (puncture to recanalization and clot visualization to recanalization), demographic data, localization of the thrombus, antithrombotic treatment at arrival, IVT infusion, and stroke subtype at discharge according to the TOAST classification. We planned to analyze the full cohort and the successful revascularization subgroup.

Results: There was no difference in procedure times between patients who received IVT and those who did not. In the successful revascularization subgroup, patients presenting with cardioembolic stroke had a significantly shorter time between clot visualizations and revascularization than the other patients (41 vs. 56 min, p = 0.024), but this was not the case in the full cohort. Also in the successful revascularization subgroup, the revascularization time was 76 vs. 61 min (p = 0.075) in patients presenting with tandem occlusion vs. the others, but there was no difference between these groups in the full cohort.

Conclusions: There was no difference in terms of procedure times in patients treated by IVT and MT vs. patients treated by MT alone either in the full cohort or in the successful revascularization subgroup. The data from the successful revascularization subgroup may be useful for studying revascularization times, provided that data from procedures that were stopped prematurely by the operator due to the length of time since symptom onset is removed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑梗死急性期静脉溶栓是否影响机械取栓的再通时间和成功率?
目的:机械取栓是治疗大血管闭塞引起的急性缺血性脑卒中的有效方法。再通时间是影响AIS治疗的关键因素。以前曾有人建议静脉溶栓(IVT)可能与更短的再通时间有关。我们研究的目的是调查IVT或其他因素是否与缩短或延长MT手术时间有关。方法:我们对当地一组接受MT治疗的患者进行了回顾性分析。我们收集了手术时间(穿刺到再通和血栓可视化到再通)、人口统计学数据、血栓定位、到达时的抗血栓治疗、IVT输注以及根据TOAST分类的出院时卒中亚型。我们计划分析整个队列和成功血运重建亚组。结果:接受IVT治疗的患者与未接受IVT治疗的患者在手术时间上无差异。在血运重建成功的亚组中,出现心栓塞性卒中的患者在血栓显像和血运重建之间的时间明显短于其他患者(41分钟vs. 56分钟,p = 0.024),但在整个队列中并非如此。在成功血运重建亚组中,串联闭塞患者与其他患者的血运重建时间分别为76分钟和61分钟(p = 0.075),但在整个队列中,这两组之间没有差异。结论:在整个队列或成功血运重建亚组中,接受IVT和MT治疗的患者与单独接受MT治疗的患者在手术时间方面没有差异。如果移除因症状出现时间过长而被手术人员过早停止的手术数据,则成功血运重建亚组的数据可能对研究血运重建时间有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra
Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: This open access and online-only journal publishes original articles covering the entire spectrum of stroke and cerebrovascular research, drawing from a variety of specialties such as neurology, internal medicine, surgery, radiology, epidemiology, cardiology, hematology, psychology and rehabilitation. Offering an international forum, it meets the growing need for sophisticated, up-to-date scientific information on clinical data, diagnostic testing, and therapeutic issues. The journal publishes original contributions, reviews of selected topics as well as clinical investigative studies. All aspects related to clinical advances are considered, while purely experimental work appears only if directly relevant to clinical issues. Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra provides additional contents based on reviewed and accepted submissions to the main journal Cerebrovascular Diseases.
期刊最新文献
Safety and Efficacy of Thrombectomy in Vietnamese Stroke Patients Selected Through Perfusion Imaging With an Onset Time Between 6-24 Hours. Intracerebral hemorrhage. Clinical Profile of Stroke Chameleons Receiving Intravenous Thrombolysis: Insights from a Single-Center Experience. Waveform Analysis of STA-MCA Bypass graft in Revascularization Surgery for Moyamoya Disease. Predictors for Adherence to Recommended Anticoagulation after Stroke Unit Discharge in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1