Spyridon Gennatas, Florence Chamberlain, Thomas Carter, Susanna Slater, Elena Cojocaru, Beth Lambourn, Anna Stansfeld, Radha Todd, Mark Verrill, Nasim Ali, Robin L Jones, Peter Simmonds, Nicola Keay, Heather McCarty, Sandra Strauss, Vassilios Karavasilis, Palma Dileo, Charlotte Benson
{"title":"Real-world experience with doxorubicin and olaratumab in soft tissue sarcomas in England and Northern Ireland.","authors":"Spyridon Gennatas, Florence Chamberlain, Thomas Carter, Susanna Slater, Elena Cojocaru, Beth Lambourn, Anna Stansfeld, Radha Todd, Mark Verrill, Nasim Ali, Robin L Jones, Peter Simmonds, Nicola Keay, Heather McCarty, Sandra Strauss, Vassilios Karavasilis, Palma Dileo, Charlotte Benson","doi":"10.1186/s13569-020-00131-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A randomised phase II trial demonstrated that the addition of olaratumab to doxorubicin significantly increased overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS) compared to doxorubicin alone. The recently presented phase III study of doxorubicin and olaratumab in advanced soft tissue sarcoma was discordant with this finding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of adult patients with advanced-/metastatic STS treated with at least two cycles of doxorubicin and olaratumab at eight sarcoma units across England and Northern Ireland between May 2017 and March 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>172 patients were evaluable and 40 patients (23.3%) had died at the time of analysis. Median ECOG performance status (PS) was 1. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.8 months (95% CI 5.9-7.7 months). Leiomyosarcoma was the most common histological subtype (75 patients, 43.6%), followed by liposarcomas (19, 11.0%). The mean number of cycles was 5 (doxorubicin range 2-6; olaratumab range 2-23). Two patients (1.2%) had a complete response and 34 (19.8%) had a partial response. 79 (45.9%) had stable and 58 (33.7%) progressive disease. 57 patients (33.1%) experienced grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and 7 patients (4.1%) grade ≥ 3 febrile neutropenia. Grade ≥ 3 anaemia was seen in 21 patients (12.2%). Grade ≥ 3 non-haematological toxicities were seen in 35 patients (20.3%). A clinically significant drop in left ventricular ejection fraction was seen in 6 patients (3.5%). 48 patients (27.9%) required a dose reduction. Overall survival (OS) is pending.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results are in keeping with the phase III study findings: response rate, PFS and OS were similar to those reported in the phase III ANNOUNCE trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":10684,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Sarcoma Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13569-020-00131-x","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Sarcoma Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13569-020-00131-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Background: A randomised phase II trial demonstrated that the addition of olaratumab to doxorubicin significantly increased overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS) compared to doxorubicin alone. The recently presented phase III study of doxorubicin and olaratumab in advanced soft tissue sarcoma was discordant with this finding.
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of adult patients with advanced-/metastatic STS treated with at least two cycles of doxorubicin and olaratumab at eight sarcoma units across England and Northern Ireland between May 2017 and March 2019.
Results: 172 patients were evaluable and 40 patients (23.3%) had died at the time of analysis. Median ECOG performance status (PS) was 1. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.8 months (95% CI 5.9-7.7 months). Leiomyosarcoma was the most common histological subtype (75 patients, 43.6%), followed by liposarcomas (19, 11.0%). The mean number of cycles was 5 (doxorubicin range 2-6; olaratumab range 2-23). Two patients (1.2%) had a complete response and 34 (19.8%) had a partial response. 79 (45.9%) had stable and 58 (33.7%) progressive disease. 57 patients (33.1%) experienced grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and 7 patients (4.1%) grade ≥ 3 febrile neutropenia. Grade ≥ 3 anaemia was seen in 21 patients (12.2%). Grade ≥ 3 non-haematological toxicities were seen in 35 patients (20.3%). A clinically significant drop in left ventricular ejection fraction was seen in 6 patients (3.5%). 48 patients (27.9%) required a dose reduction. Overall survival (OS) is pending.
Conclusions: Our results are in keeping with the phase III study findings: response rate, PFS and OS were similar to those reported in the phase III ANNOUNCE trial.
背景:一项随机II期试验表明,与单独使用阿霉素相比,奥拉单抗联合阿霉素可显著提高晚期软组织肉瘤(STS)患者的总生存期(OS)。最近发表的阿霉素和奥拉拉单抗治疗晚期软组织肉瘤的III期研究与这一发现不一致。方法:我们对2017年5月至2019年3月期间在英格兰和北爱尔兰的8个肉瘤单位接受至少两个周期阿霉素和奥拉单抗治疗的晚期/转移性STS成年患者进行了回顾性分析。结果:172例患者可评估,40例患者(23.3%)在分析时死亡。ECOG表现状态(PS)中位数为1。中位无进展生存期(PFS)为6.8个月(95% CI 5.9-7.7个月)。平滑肌肉瘤是最常见的组织学亚型(75例,43.6%),其次是脂肪肉瘤(19例,11.0%)。平均周期数为5(阿霉素范围2-6;奥拉拉单抗范围2-23)。2例(1.2%)患者完全缓解,34例(19.8%)患者部分缓解。79例(45.9%)病情稳定,58例(33.7%)病情进展。57例(33.1%)出现≥3级中性粒细胞减少,7例(4.1%)出现≥3级发热性中性粒细胞减少。≥3级贫血21例(12.2%)。35例患者(20.3%)出现≥3级非血液学毒性。6例患者左室射血分数显著下降(3.5%)。48例(27.9%)患者需要减少剂量。总生存期(OS)待定。结论:我们的结果与III期研究结果一致:缓解率、PFS和OS与III期ANNOUNCE试验报告的结果相似。
期刊介绍:
Clinical Sarcoma Research considers for publication articles related to research on sarcomas, including both soft tissue and bone. The journal publishes original articles and review articles on the diagnosis and treatment of sarcomas along with new insights in sarcoma research, which may be of immediate or future interest for diagnosis and treatment. The journal also considers negative results, especially those from studies on new agents, as it is vital for the medical community to learn whether new agents have been proven effective or ineffective within subtypes of sarcomas. The journal also aims to offer a forum for active discussion on topics of major interest for the sarcoma community, which may be related to both research results and methodological topics.