Characterization of Perineum Elasticity and Pubic Bone-Perineal Critical Distance with a Novel Tactile Probe: Results of an Intraobserver Reproducibility Study.

Justin S Brandt, Todd Rosen, Heather Van Raalte, Viktors Kurtenos, Vladimir Egorov
{"title":"Characterization of Perineum Elasticity and Pubic Bone-Perineal Critical Distance with a Novel Tactile Probe: Results of an Intraobserver Reproducibility Study.","authors":"Justin S Brandt, Todd Rosen, Heather Van Raalte, Viktors Kurtenos, Vladimir Egorov","doi":"10.4236/ojog.2020.1040044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tactile imaging provides biomechanical mapping of soft tissues. Objective biomechanical and anatomical assessment of critical structures within the vagina and pelvis may allow development and validation of a clinical tool that could assist with clinical decisions regarding obstetrical procedures and mode of delivery. Objective: To assess intraobserver reproducibility of measurements of perineal elasticity and pubic bone-perineal critical distance with a novel tactile probe in pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An Antepartum Tactile Imager (ATI) was designed with a vaginal probe resembling a fetal skull. The probe comprises 128 tactile sensors on a double curved surface and measures 46 mm in width and 72 mm in length. The probe has a motion tracking sensor that allows acquisition of 3D tactile images. There were two arms of the study. In the first arm, biomechanical mapping of the perineum and pelvic bone location was performed in 10 non-pregnant women for purposes of demonstrating safety and feasibility. In the second arm, biomechanical mapping was performed in 10 pregnant women to explore intraobserver reproducibility. Each subject had two standardized examinations over 3 - 5 minutes by the same observer. Examination comfort and pain levels were assessed by post-procedure survey. Reproducibility was analyzed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals and Bland-Altman plots. Bias and the 95% limits of agreement were also calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The safety and feasibility arm of the study demonstrated high degree of safety and tolerability and reliable acquisition of tactile signals. In the reproducibility arm, 10 pregnant women were recruited at mean gestational age of 34.2 ± 6.5 weeks. The mean perineum elasticity (Young's modulus, E) was 9.8 ± 5.9 kPa, and the mean pubic bone-perineal critical distance (D) at 20 kPa load was 34.6 ± 6.2 mm. The ICC was 0.97 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91, 0.99] and 0.82 [CI 0.44, 0.95] for E and D respectively, consistent with excellent intrarater agreement. The bias and the 95% limits of agreement of E were -6.3% and -29.4% to +16.7%, respectively. The bias and the 95% limits of agreement of D were -2.6% and -25.3% to +20.2%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The tactile imaging data obtained in the study reproducibly characterized perineal elasticity and pubic bone-perineal critical distance. Further evaluation of this tool in clinical settings is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19676,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"10 4","pages":"493-503"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7213583/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2020.1040044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tactile imaging provides biomechanical mapping of soft tissues. Objective biomechanical and anatomical assessment of critical structures within the vagina and pelvis may allow development and validation of a clinical tool that could assist with clinical decisions regarding obstetrical procedures and mode of delivery. Objective: To assess intraobserver reproducibility of measurements of perineal elasticity and pubic bone-perineal critical distance with a novel tactile probe in pregnant women.

Methods: An Antepartum Tactile Imager (ATI) was designed with a vaginal probe resembling a fetal skull. The probe comprises 128 tactile sensors on a double curved surface and measures 46 mm in width and 72 mm in length. The probe has a motion tracking sensor that allows acquisition of 3D tactile images. There were two arms of the study. In the first arm, biomechanical mapping of the perineum and pelvic bone location was performed in 10 non-pregnant women for purposes of demonstrating safety and feasibility. In the second arm, biomechanical mapping was performed in 10 pregnant women to explore intraobserver reproducibility. Each subject had two standardized examinations over 3 - 5 minutes by the same observer. Examination comfort and pain levels were assessed by post-procedure survey. Reproducibility was analyzed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals and Bland-Altman plots. Bias and the 95% limits of agreement were also calculated.

Results: The safety and feasibility arm of the study demonstrated high degree of safety and tolerability and reliable acquisition of tactile signals. In the reproducibility arm, 10 pregnant women were recruited at mean gestational age of 34.2 ± 6.5 weeks. The mean perineum elasticity (Young's modulus, E) was 9.8 ± 5.9 kPa, and the mean pubic bone-perineal critical distance (D) at 20 kPa load was 34.6 ± 6.2 mm. The ICC was 0.97 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91, 0.99] and 0.82 [CI 0.44, 0.95] for E and D respectively, consistent with excellent intrarater agreement. The bias and the 95% limits of agreement of E were -6.3% and -29.4% to +16.7%, respectively. The bias and the 95% limits of agreement of D were -2.6% and -25.3% to +20.2%, respectively.

Conclusions: The tactile imaging data obtained in the study reproducibly characterized perineal elasticity and pubic bone-perineal critical distance. Further evaluation of this tool in clinical settings is warranted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用新型触觉探针确定会阴弹性和耻骨-会阴临界距离的特征:观察者内部可重复性研究结果。
背景:触觉成像可提供软组织的生物力学图谱。对阴道和骨盆内的关键结构进行客观的生物力学和解剖学评估,有助于开发和验证一种临床工具,帮助临床决定产科手术和分娩方式。目的评估使用新型触觉探针测量孕妇会阴弹性和耻骨-会阴临界距离的观察者内部可重复性:方法:设计了一种产前触觉成像仪(ATI),其阴道探头与胎儿头骨相似。该探头由双曲面上的 128 个触觉传感器组成,宽 46 毫米,长 72 毫米。探头上有一个运动跟踪传感器,可以采集三维触觉图像。研究分为两部分。在第一阶段,对 10 名非孕妇进行会阴和盆骨位置的生物力学测绘,以证明其安全性和可行性。在第二组中,对 10 名孕妇进行了生物力学测绘,以探索观察者内部的可重复性。每名受试者都接受了两次标准化检查,由同一观察者进行,时间为 3-5 分钟。检查舒适度和疼痛程度通过术后调查进行评估。再现性通过带 95% 置信区间的类内相关系数 (ICC) 和 Bland-Altman 图进行分析。此外,还计算了偏差和 95% 的一致性限值:研究的安全性和可行性部分显示了高度的安全性和耐受性,以及对触觉信号的可靠采集。在可重复性研究组中,共招募了 10 名孕妇,平均胎龄为 34.2 ± 6.5 周。会阴的平均弹性(杨氏模量,E)为 9.8 ± 5.9 kPa,20 kPa 负荷下耻骨-会阴临界距离(D)的平均值为 34.6 ± 6.2 mm。E和D的ICC分别为0.97[95%置信区间(CI)0.91,0.99]和0.82[CI 0.44,0.95],具有极好的内部一致性。E 的偏差和 95% 的一致性限值分别为 -6.3%、-29.4% 至 +16.7%。D的偏差和95%的一致性范围分别为-2.6%和-25.3%至+20.2%:本研究中获得的触觉成像数据可再现会阴弹性和耻骨-会阴临界距离的特征。有必要在临床环境中进一步评估这一工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors Influencing the Resumption of Postpartum Female Sexuality in Women Who Have Given Birth Once or Several Times at the Ignace Deen Maternity Hospital of the Conakry University Hospital Centre (Guinea) Practice of Obstetrical Hysterectomy at the Sylvanus Olympio University Hospital Center: Indications and Maternal Prognosis Review of Maternal Deaths in Two Health Regions of Togo: About 69 Cases (Epidemiological and Sociodemographic Aspects) Conservative Treatment of Breast Cancer and Oncoplasty at the Teaching Hospital Mother and Child of Jeanne Ebori Foundation in Libreville (Gabon) Cohort Study on Benefit of Martial Supplementation with EDTA Sodium Iron in Management of Gravidic Anemia at the University Clinics of Kinshasa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1