Survival Benefits of N-Acetylcysteine in Rodenticide Poisoning: Retrospective Evidence from an Indian Tertiary Care Setting.

Karen Mark, Shabnam Hyder, Muhammed Rashid, Viji P Chandran, Shubha Seshadri, Sneha Seshadri, Sreedharan Nair, Girish Thunga
{"title":"Survival Benefits of N-Acetylcysteine in Rodenticide Poisoning: Retrospective Evidence from an Indian Tertiary Care Setting.","authors":"Karen Mark,&nbsp;Shabnam Hyder,&nbsp;Muhammed Rashid,&nbsp;Viji P Chandran,&nbsp;Shubha Seshadri,&nbsp;Sneha Seshadri,&nbsp;Sreedharan Nair,&nbsp;Girish Thunga","doi":"10.2174/1574884715666200513090634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale & objective: </strong>Rodenticide poisoning, either accidental or intentional, is very common in rural India. The absence of a definite antidote made it a major concern with a high mortality rate. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC) in rodenticide poisoning as there are recent positive shreds of evidence on it.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital on patients admitted with rodenticide poisoning during a period of 2012-2017. The Fischer's exact test and relative risk were measured to analyze the outcome of treatment and risk factors, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 229 patients were enrolled in the study with a mean age of 30.04 ± 15.67 years. The suicidal attack was the major (86.0%) reason for poison consumption. The survival rate was significantly (p ≤ 0.03) higher in the NAC treatment group compared to the non-NAC group. Moreover, the majority (93.4%) of participants did not experience any adverse effects. The mean oral loading dose and maintenance dose was 7580.95 ± 2204.29 mg and 3694.53 ± 2322.58 mg, respectively. Yellow Phosphorus poisoning (Relative Risk [RR] 2.888 (1.179-7.079); p=0.020) and Time lag of ≥ 24 hours (RR 3.479 (1.137-10.645); p=0.029) were the significant risk factors for mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NAC is shown to have a significant survival benefit with a good safety profile among rodenticide poisoners. Further adequately powered prospective researches with more emphasis on dosing parameters are warranted for better quantification in different settings and for clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":29871,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology","volume":"16 2","pages":"201-208"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1574884715666200513090634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Rationale & objective: Rodenticide poisoning, either accidental or intentional, is very common in rural India. The absence of a definite antidote made it a major concern with a high mortality rate. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC) in rodenticide poisoning as there are recent positive shreds of evidence on it.

Methodology: A retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital on patients admitted with rodenticide poisoning during a period of 2012-2017. The Fischer's exact test and relative risk were measured to analyze the outcome of treatment and risk factors, respectively.

Results: A total of 229 patients were enrolled in the study with a mean age of 30.04 ± 15.67 years. The suicidal attack was the major (86.0%) reason for poison consumption. The survival rate was significantly (p ≤ 0.03) higher in the NAC treatment group compared to the non-NAC group. Moreover, the majority (93.4%) of participants did not experience any adverse effects. The mean oral loading dose and maintenance dose was 7580.95 ± 2204.29 mg and 3694.53 ± 2322.58 mg, respectively. Yellow Phosphorus poisoning (Relative Risk [RR] 2.888 (1.179-7.079); p=0.020) and Time lag of ≥ 24 hours (RR 3.479 (1.137-10.645); p=0.029) were the significant risk factors for mortality.

Conclusion: NAC is shown to have a significant survival benefit with a good safety profile among rodenticide poisoners. Further adequately powered prospective researches with more emphasis on dosing parameters are warranted for better quantification in different settings and for clinical implementation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
n -乙酰半胱氨酸对杀鼠剂中毒患者的生存益处:来自印度三级医疗机构的回顾性证据。
理由与目的:灭鼠剂中毒,无论是意外的还是故意的,在印度农村是非常普遍的。由于缺乏明确的解毒剂,使其成为造成高死亡率的一个主要问题。因此,鉴于近年来有关n -乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)在杀鼠剂中毒中的阳性证据,本研究旨在评估NAC在杀鼠剂中毒中的有效性。方法:对某三级教学医院2012-2017年因杀鼠剂中毒入院的患者进行回顾性研究。分别测量fisher精确检验和相对危险度,分析治疗结果和危险因素。结果:229例患者入组,平均年龄30.04±15.67岁。自杀攻击是服毒的主要原因(86.0%)。NAC治疗组生存率显著高于非NAC组(p≤0.03)。此外,大多数(93.4%)的参与者没有出现任何不良反应。平均口服负荷剂量为7580.95±2204.29 mg,维持剂量为3694.53±2322.58 mg。黄磷中毒(相对危险度[RR] 2.888 (1.179-7.079);p=0.020),时差≥24小时(RR 3.479 (1.137-10.645);P =0.029)是死亡率的显著危险因素。结论:NAC具有显著的生存效益和良好的安全性。为了在不同的环境和临床实施中更好地量化,有必要进一步充分支持前瞻性研究,更强调剂量参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Bigels as Novel Drug Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review on Efficiency and Influential Factors. Effectiveness and Tolerability of Various 5-Fluorouracil Formulations as Adjuvant Therapies for Vitiligo Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Exploring the Role of Deutetrabenazine in the Treatment of Chorea Linked with Huntington's Disease. Insights into the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy: A Focus on Oxidative Stress and Neuroinflammation. Leveraging Generative AI for Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1