Recurrent postmenopausal bleeding: a survey of practice among gynecologists in Scotland.

IF 1 Q2 Medicine Minerva ginecologica Pub Date : 2020-04-01 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04432-9
Marwa M Allam, Mohammed S Allam, Mohamed K Mehasseb
{"title":"Recurrent postmenopausal bleeding: a survey of practice among gynecologists in Scotland.","authors":"Marwa M Allam,&nbsp;Mohammed S Allam,&nbsp;Mohamed K Mehasseb","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04432-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The definition and management of recurrent postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) are not well described in the literature, with no consensus among the clinicians and no available contemporary UK evidence-based guidelines. We conducted this survey to examine the practice of gynecologists based in Scotland in relation to recurrent postmenopausal bleeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based questionnaire was sent to 200 non-training grade gynecologists in Scotland exploring their views on the definition, investigation and management of recurrent PMB. Data were extracted from the 61 responses received.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven percent of responders defined recurrent PMB as two or more episodes of PMB, while 21% defined it after three episodes. A bleed-free interval of 3 and 6 months was needed to identify a recurrence by 46% and 44% of responders, respectively. 70% would investigate recurrent PMB with a combination of transvaginal sonography, hysteroscopy and biopsy. Only 19% would arrange a pelvic MRI routinely, while 43% would never offer one. 72% would consider a hysterectomy at some stage, with 22% of responders offering it after 3 episodes of PMB with negative investigation. 18% would never offer a hysterectomy without an identified pathology. 32% of responders felt that the management of recurrent PMB required an individualized case-by-case approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey highlights the need for a clinical guideline to address the wide variation in the management of recurrent PMB.</p>","PeriodicalId":18745,"journal":{"name":"Minerva ginecologica","volume":"72 2","pages":"64-69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva ginecologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04432-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The definition and management of recurrent postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) are not well described in the literature, with no consensus among the clinicians and no available contemporary UK evidence-based guidelines. We conducted this survey to examine the practice of gynecologists based in Scotland in relation to recurrent postmenopausal bleeding.

Methods: A web-based questionnaire was sent to 200 non-training grade gynecologists in Scotland exploring their views on the definition, investigation and management of recurrent PMB. Data were extracted from the 61 responses received.

Results: Seventy-seven percent of responders defined recurrent PMB as two or more episodes of PMB, while 21% defined it after three episodes. A bleed-free interval of 3 and 6 months was needed to identify a recurrence by 46% and 44% of responders, respectively. 70% would investigate recurrent PMB with a combination of transvaginal sonography, hysteroscopy and biopsy. Only 19% would arrange a pelvic MRI routinely, while 43% would never offer one. 72% would consider a hysterectomy at some stage, with 22% of responders offering it after 3 episodes of PMB with negative investigation. 18% would never offer a hysterectomy without an identified pathology. 32% of responders felt that the management of recurrent PMB required an individualized case-by-case approach.

Conclusions: This survey highlights the need for a clinical guideline to address the wide variation in the management of recurrent PMB.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复发性绝经后出血:在苏格兰妇科医生的实践调查。
背景:绝经后复发性出血(PMB)的定义和处理在文献中没有很好的描述,临床医生之间没有共识,也没有可用的当代英国循证指南。我们进行这项调查是为了检查苏格兰妇科医生在绝经后复发性出血方面的做法。方法:对苏格兰200名非培训级妇科医生进行网络问卷调查,了解他们对复发性PMB的定义、调查和管理的看法。数据摘自收到的61份答复。结果:77%的应答者将复发性PMB定义为两次或两次以上的PMB发作,而21%的应答者将三次发作后定义为复发性PMB。分别有46%和44%的应答者需要3个月和6个月的无出血间隔来识别复发。70%的患者会结合阴道超声、宫腔镜和活检检查复发性PMB。只有19%的人会定期安排盆腔核磁共振检查,而43%的人永远不会提供。72%的人会考虑在某个阶段进行子宫切除术,22%的应答者在3次PMB发作后提供子宫切除术。18%的人不会在没有明确病理的情况下提供子宫切除术。32%的应答者认为复发性PMB的管理需要个体化的具体情况具体分析。结论:这项调查强调需要一个临床指南来解决复发性PMB管理的广泛差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva ginecologica
Minerva ginecologica OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Ginecologica publishes scientific papers on obstetrics and gynecology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Minilaparoscopy in gynecology: applications, benefits and limitations. Re-birth in a Covid hospital: a point of view. Endometriosis-associated infertility: surgery or IVF? Cesarean delivery: an evidence-based review on of the technique. Approaching ovarian endometrioma with medical therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1