Could art cycles have a detrimental effect on ovarian reserve? A retrospective case control study.

IF 1 Q2 Medicine Minerva ginecologica Pub Date : 2020-04-01 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04542-6
Lucia Riganelli, Lucia Merlino, Cesare Aragona, Oriana Capri, Silvia Franceschetti, Antonella Linari, Marianna Mariani, Giulietta Micara, Daniela Pietrangeli, Maria G Porpora, Maria G Piccioni
{"title":"Could art cycles have a detrimental effect on ovarian reserve? A retrospective case control study.","authors":"Lucia Riganelli,&nbsp;Lucia Merlino,&nbsp;Cesare Aragona,&nbsp;Oriana Capri,&nbsp;Silvia Franceschetti,&nbsp;Antonella Linari,&nbsp;Marianna Mariani,&nbsp;Giulietta Micara,&nbsp;Daniela Pietrangeli,&nbsp;Maria G Porpora,&nbsp;Maria G Piccioni","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04542-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Even if it is supposed damage of repeated ART (assisted reproductive technology) cycles on oocyte pool, there is still no evidence in literature. Aim of the study is to investigate whether infertile women who undergo to several ART cycles can show a lower ovarian reserve measured by AMH (Anti-Mullerian hormone) levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study includes 282 infertile women, between 18 and 42 years, and allocated into two groups: 159 women previously submitted to two or more ART cycles (group A) and 123 women never submitted naïve to-ART cycles (group B). We tested whether AMH, FSH, LH and E2 levels were significantly different between the two groups, stratifying according to age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regardless to the age ranges bands, the AMH in group A was statistically significant lower than in group B with a statistical significance (P=0.047). In particular women aged over 35 previously submitted to one or more ART cycles showed lower AMH levels, than those paired with age, which had never been treated with ART.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the limitations of the study, our data demonstrate a reduced AMH levels in women aged over 35 previously submitted to two or more repeated ART-cycles compared to patients never treated before. The strength of this study is the actuality of the topic that has not been discussed before in detail.</p>","PeriodicalId":18745,"journal":{"name":"Minerva ginecologica","volume":"72 2","pages":"75-81"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva ginecologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04542-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Even if it is supposed damage of repeated ART (assisted reproductive technology) cycles on oocyte pool, there is still no evidence in literature. Aim of the study is to investigate whether infertile women who undergo to several ART cycles can show a lower ovarian reserve measured by AMH (Anti-Mullerian hormone) levels.

Methods: The study includes 282 infertile women, between 18 and 42 years, and allocated into two groups: 159 women previously submitted to two or more ART cycles (group A) and 123 women never submitted naïve to-ART cycles (group B). We tested whether AMH, FSH, LH and E2 levels were significantly different between the two groups, stratifying according to age.

Results: Regardless to the age ranges bands, the AMH in group A was statistically significant lower than in group B with a statistical significance (P=0.047). In particular women aged over 35 previously submitted to one or more ART cycles showed lower AMH levels, than those paired with age, which had never been treated with ART.

Conclusions: Despite the limitations of the study, our data demonstrate a reduced AMH levels in women aged over 35 previously submitted to two or more repeated ART-cycles compared to patients never treated before. The strength of this study is the actuality of the topic that has not been discussed before in detail.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
艺术周期会对卵巢储备产生不利影响吗?回顾性病例对照研究。
背景:即使假定是重复ART(辅助生殖技术)周期对卵母细胞池的损害,文献中仍无证据。这项研究的目的是调查接受几个ART周期的不孕妇女是否会表现出较低的卵巢储备(抗苗勒管激素)水平。方法:研究纳入282名年龄在18岁至42岁之间的不孕妇女,分为两组:159名妇女曾经接受过两个或两个以上的ART周期(A组),123名妇女从未接受过naïve -ART周期(B组)。我们检测了两组之间AMH, FSH, LH和E2水平是否有显著差异,并根据年龄分层。结果:A组各年龄段AMH均低于B组,差异均有统计学意义(P=0.047)。特别是35岁以上的妇女,以前接受过一个或多个抗逆转录病毒治疗周期,其AMH水平低于从未接受过抗逆转录病毒治疗的年龄。结论:尽管该研究存在局限性,但我们的数据表明,与从未接受过治疗的患者相比,35岁以上接受过两次或两次以上重复art周期的女性AMH水平降低。本研究的优势在于对之前未被详细讨论的课题进行了现实性的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva ginecologica
Minerva ginecologica OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Ginecologica publishes scientific papers on obstetrics and gynecology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Minilaparoscopy in gynecology: applications, benefits and limitations. Re-birth in a Covid hospital: a point of view. Endometriosis-associated infertility: surgery or IVF? Cesarean delivery: an evidence-based review on of the technique. Approaching ovarian endometrioma with medical therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1