Effect of Three Types of Activities on Improving Mood and Enjoyment in a Brief Online Depression Study.

Q1 Psychology Depression Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2020-01-25 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/1387832
Caitriona Tilden, Melissa H Bond, Taylor N Stephens, Tyler Lyckberg, Ricardo F Muñoz, Eduardo L Bunge
{"title":"Effect of Three Types of Activities on Improving Mood and Enjoyment in a Brief Online Depression Study.","authors":"Caitriona Tilden,&nbsp;Melissa H Bond,&nbsp;Taylor N Stephens,&nbsp;Tyler Lyckberg,&nbsp;Ricardo F Muñoz,&nbsp;Eduardo L Bunge","doi":"10.1155/2020/1387832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The goal of this study is to determine whether different types of activities have a differential effect on mood and enjoyment. <i>Methods.</i> A secondary analysis of the data of 754 participants (<i>M</i> <sub>age</sub> = 35.8 years, <i>SD</i> <sub>age</sub> = 12.6; <i>M</i> <sub>PHQ-9</sub> = 7.6, <i>SD</i> <sub>PHQ-9</sub> = 7.0) who were recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) to participate in a brief online study. Participants completed an activity log and reported retrospectively about three types of activities (Pleasant, Meaningful, and Mastery) at baseline and one week follow-up. A mixed effects ANOVA was used to analyze the effect of weekly activities on mood, and a temporal analysis model was used to test for the effect of daily activities on enjoyment. <i>Results.</i> Participants who reported higher number of Mastery activities for the week had higher mood ratings at follow-up (F (1, 39) = 4.89, <i>p</i> < .05), regardless of depression status at baseline. Pleasant and Meaningful activities did not have a significant effect on mood. Daily engagement in any of the three activity types increased enjoyment of that day (Pleasant: <i>b</i> = 0.312, <i>t</i> (1811) = 46.73, <i>p</i> < .001; Meaningful: <i>b</i> = 0.254, <i>t</i> (1814) = 11.65, <i>p</i> < .001; Mastery: <i>b</i> = 0.290, <i>t</i> (1816) = 13.07, <i>p</i> < .001]. <i>Conclusions.</i> These findings contribute to the understanding on how brief behavioral activation interventions delivered online may influence participants' mood and enjoyment, and can inform clinicians' recommendations about types of activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":38441,"journal":{"name":"Depression Research and Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/1387832","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1387832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The goal of this study is to determine whether different types of activities have a differential effect on mood and enjoyment. Methods. A secondary analysis of the data of 754 participants (M age = 35.8 years, SD age = 12.6; M PHQ-9 = 7.6, SD PHQ-9 = 7.0) who were recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) to participate in a brief online study. Participants completed an activity log and reported retrospectively about three types of activities (Pleasant, Meaningful, and Mastery) at baseline and one week follow-up. A mixed effects ANOVA was used to analyze the effect of weekly activities on mood, and a temporal analysis model was used to test for the effect of daily activities on enjoyment. Results. Participants who reported higher number of Mastery activities for the week had higher mood ratings at follow-up (F (1, 39) = 4.89, p < .05), regardless of depression status at baseline. Pleasant and Meaningful activities did not have a significant effect on mood. Daily engagement in any of the three activity types increased enjoyment of that day (Pleasant: b = 0.312, t (1811) = 46.73, p < .001; Meaningful: b = 0.254, t (1814) = 11.65, p < .001; Mastery: b = 0.290, t (1816) = 13.07, p < .001]. Conclusions. These findings contribute to the understanding on how brief behavioral activation interventions delivered online may influence participants' mood and enjoyment, and can inform clinicians' recommendations about types of activities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项简短的在线抑郁症研究:三种类型的活动对改善情绪和享受的影响
这项研究的目的是确定不同类型的活动是否对情绪和享受有不同的影响。方法。对754名参与者的资料进行二次分析(M年龄= 35.8岁,SD年龄= 12.6;M PHQ-9 = 7.6, SD PHQ-9 = 7.0),他们通过亚马逊土耳其机械(AMT)招募来参加一个简短的在线研究。参与者完成了一份活动日志,并在基线和一周的随访中回顾性地报告了三种类型的活动(愉快、有意义和精通)。采用混合效应方差分析分析每周活动对情绪的影响,采用时间分析模型检验日常活动对享受的影响。结果。报告一周掌握活动次数较多的参与者在随访时的情绪评分较高(F (1,39) = 4.89, p < 0.05),无论基线时的抑郁状态如何。愉快和有意义的活动对情绪没有显著影响。每天参与三种活动类型中的任何一种都会增加当天的享受(Pleasant: b = 0.312, t (1811) = 46.73, p < 0.001;有意义:b = 0.254, t (1814) = 11.65, p < 0.001;精通程度:b = 0.290, t (1816) = 13.07, p < 0.001。结论。这些发现有助于理解在线提供的简短行为激活干预如何影响参与者的情绪和享受,并可以为临床医生提供有关活动类型的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Depression Research and Treatment
Depression Research and Treatment Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Prevalence of Depression and Anxiety and Its Association with Sleep Quality in the First-Year Medical Science Students Common Mental Disorder and Associated Factors among Women Attending Antenatal Care Follow-Up in North Wollo Public Health Facilities, Amhara Region, Northeast Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study Gratitude and Religiosity in Psychiatric Inpatients with Depression. Developing a Depression Care Model for the Hill Tribes: A Family- and Community-Based Participatory Research. Network Structure of Comorbidity Patterns in U.S. Adults with Depression: A National Study Based on Data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1