Implant survival after surgical treatment of early apical peri-implantitis: An ambispective cohort study covering a 20-year period.

María A Peñarrocha-Diago, Juan Antonio Blaya-Tárraga, Isabel Menéndez-Nieto, Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago, David Peñarrocha-Oltra
{"title":"Implant survival after surgical treatment of early apical peri-implantitis: An ambispective cohort study covering a 20-year period.","authors":"María A Peñarrocha-Diago,&nbsp;Juan Antonio Blaya-Tárraga,&nbsp;Isabel Menéndez-Nieto,&nbsp;Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago,&nbsp;David Peñarrocha-Oltra","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe implant survival at least 1 year after the surgical treatment of early apical peri-implantitis (EAP) and explore potential risk factors of failure of such treatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An ambispective cohort study was conducted, involving all patients in whom EAP was detected and surgically treated between 1996 and 2016. Reporting followed the STROBE guidelines. The time from implant placement (IP) to EAP surgery (EAPS), the diagnostic stage and intraoperative variables (location, apical lesion in the tooth being replaced, mesial and distal tooth-implant distance measured at the apex, periapical surgery of the adjacent tooth, guided bone regeneration, implant resection, explantation) were recorded to determine their impact upon treatment outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial sample consisted of 58 implants in 46 patients. The mean time from IP to EAPS was 21.7 ± 10.1 days. At the time of surgery, eight implants presented mobility and were explanted. The final sample consisted of 50 implants in 39 patients evaluated for implant survival after surgical treatment. A cumulative survival rate of 78.3% was recorded. The mean survival time of the EAP treated implants was 85.4 months (standard deviation [SD] 5.94). The diagnostic stage (P < 0.001) and the existence of a previous periapical lesion in the tooth being replaced (P = 0.022) had a significant influence upon implant survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The cumulative survival rate was 78.3%, with a mean survival time of 85.4 months. The diagnostic stage of EAP and the presence of a lesion in the tooth being replaced significantly influenced the survival of implants with EAP subjected to surgical treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":73463,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To describe implant survival at least 1 year after the surgical treatment of early apical peri-implantitis (EAP) and explore potential risk factors of failure of such treatment.

Materials and methods: An ambispective cohort study was conducted, involving all patients in whom EAP was detected and surgically treated between 1996 and 2016. Reporting followed the STROBE guidelines. The time from implant placement (IP) to EAP surgery (EAPS), the diagnostic stage and intraoperative variables (location, apical lesion in the tooth being replaced, mesial and distal tooth-implant distance measured at the apex, periapical surgery of the adjacent tooth, guided bone regeneration, implant resection, explantation) were recorded to determine their impact upon treatment outcome.

Results: The initial sample consisted of 58 implants in 46 patients. The mean time from IP to EAPS was 21.7 ± 10.1 days. At the time of surgery, eight implants presented mobility and were explanted. The final sample consisted of 50 implants in 39 patients evaluated for implant survival after surgical treatment. A cumulative survival rate of 78.3% was recorded. The mean survival time of the EAP treated implants was 85.4 months (standard deviation [SD] 5.94). The diagnostic stage (P < 0.001) and the existence of a previous periapical lesion in the tooth being replaced (P = 0.022) had a significant influence upon implant survival.

Conclusions: The cumulative survival rate was 78.3%, with a mean survival time of 85.4 months. The diagnostic stage of EAP and the presence of a lesion in the tooth being replaced significantly influenced the survival of implants with EAP subjected to surgical treatment.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术治疗早期根尖种植体周围炎后种植体存活:一项覆盖20年的双视角队列研究。
目的:描述早期根尖种植体周围炎(EAP)手术治疗后至少1年的种植体存活情况,并探讨EAP治疗失败的潜在危险因素。材料与方法:采用双视角队列研究,纳入1996 - 2016年间所有检测到EAP并进行手术治疗的患者。报告遵循了STROBE指南。记录从种植体放置(IP)到EAP手术(EAPS)的时间、诊断阶段和术中变量(位置、被替换牙齿的根尖病变、近端和远端牙与种植体的距离、邻近牙齿的根尖周手术、引导骨再生、种植体切除、外植体),以确定其对治疗结果的影响。结果:46例患者的初始样品包括58个种植体。从IP到EAPS的平均时间为21.7±10.1 d。手术时,8个植入物表现出活动能力并被移出。最终样本包括39例手术后评估种植体存活率的患者的50个种植体。累计生存率为78.3%。EAP处理种植体的平均生存时间为85.4个月(标准差[SD] 5.94)。诊断阶段(P < 0.001)和替换牙是否存在根尖周围病变(P = 0.022)对种植体存活有显著影响。结论:累计生存率为78.3%,平均生存时间85.4个月。EAP的诊断阶段和被替换牙齿中是否存在病变显著影响EAP种植体在手术治疗中的存活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A 360-degree extraction socket classification for immediate dentoalveolar restoration. A randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of guided bone regeneration with polytetrafluoroethylene titanium-reinforced membranes, CAD/CAM semi-occlusive titanium meshes and CAD/CAM occlusive titanium foils in partially atrophic arches. Bone augmentation using titanium mesh: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical and histological efficacy of a new implant surface in achieving early and stable osseointegration: An in vivo study. Crown-to-implant ratio: A misnomer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1