Some Metatheoretical Principles for Personality Neuroscience.

Q3 Medicine Personality Neuroscience Pub Date : 2018-08-10 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1017/pen.2018.9
Neil McNaughton, Luke D Smillie
{"title":"Some Metatheoretical Principles for Personality Neuroscience.","authors":"Neil McNaughton, Luke D Smillie","doi":"10.1017/pen.2018.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Theories in personality neuroscience must aim to be consistent with several levels of explanation. If we view personality traits as constructs located only at the psychological level, we must still make their explanations compatible with observations and theories at lower levels, particularly with what we know at the neural level. If we view personality traits as constructs located only at the neural level, we will still need to predict their emergent effects at the psychological level. Personality theory at present treats traits as psychological-level constructs, with even the recent neurally oriented Cybernetic Big Five Theory specified in terms of a \"conceptual nervous system\" and not requiring complete or immediate translation into neural mechanisms. Here, we argue for the existence of phylogenetically old, neural-level traits that are substantially conserved across many vertebrate species. We first ask what known mechanisms control trait-like properties of neural systems: Focusing on hormones, the GABA<sub>A</sub> receptor, and amine neurotransmitter systems. We derive from what we know about these sources of neuronal modulation some metatheoretical principles to guide the future development of those aspects of personality theory, starting with neural-level trait constructs and drawing implications for higher-level trait psychology observations. Current descriptive approaches such as the Big Five are an essential precursor to personality neuroscience, but may not map one-to-one to the mechanisms and constructs of a neuroscience-based approach to traits.</p>","PeriodicalId":36424,"journal":{"name":"Personality Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"e11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/pen.2018.9","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pen.2018.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Theories in personality neuroscience must aim to be consistent with several levels of explanation. If we view personality traits as constructs located only at the psychological level, we must still make their explanations compatible with observations and theories at lower levels, particularly with what we know at the neural level. If we view personality traits as constructs located only at the neural level, we will still need to predict their emergent effects at the psychological level. Personality theory at present treats traits as psychological-level constructs, with even the recent neurally oriented Cybernetic Big Five Theory specified in terms of a "conceptual nervous system" and not requiring complete or immediate translation into neural mechanisms. Here, we argue for the existence of phylogenetically old, neural-level traits that are substantially conserved across many vertebrate species. We first ask what known mechanisms control trait-like properties of neural systems: Focusing on hormones, the GABAA receptor, and amine neurotransmitter systems. We derive from what we know about these sources of neuronal modulation some metatheoretical principles to guide the future development of those aspects of personality theory, starting with neural-level trait constructs and drawing implications for higher-level trait psychology observations. Current descriptive approaches such as the Big Five are an essential precursor to personality neuroscience, but may not map one-to-one to the mechanisms and constructs of a neuroscience-based approach to traits.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人格神经科学的一些元理论原则。
人格神经科学的理论必须力求与几个层次的解释保持一致。如果我们将人格特征视为只存在于心理层面的结构,我们仍然必须使其解释与较低层次的观察和理论相一致,特别是与我们在神经层面所知道的相一致。如果我们将人格特质视为只存在于神经层面的构念,我们仍然需要预测它们在心理层面的突现效应。目前,人格理论将特征视为心理层面的构念,甚至最近以神经为导向的控制论大五理论也以“概念神经系统”的方式进行了说明,不需要完整或立即转化为神经机制。在这里,我们认为存在系统发育上古老的、神经水平的特征,这些特征在许多脊椎动物物种中基本上是保守的。我们首先询问控制神经系统特征特性的已知机制:关注激素、GABAA受体和胺类神经递质系统。从我们对这些神经元调节来源的了解中,我们得出了一些元理论原则来指导人格理论这些方面的未来发展,从神经层面的特质构建开始,并为更高层次的特质心理学观察提供启示。目前的描述方法,如“大五”是人格神经科学的重要先驱,但可能无法一一映射到基于神经科学的特征方法的机制和结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Personality Neuroscience
Personality Neuroscience Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Jaak Panksepp's primary emotions are associated with Diener's global life satisfaction: How low arousal of the SADNESS/separation distress system could form the core of life satisfaction? Reduced MMN-indexed auditory change detection in a non-clinical high schizotypy sample. Are you how you eat? Aspects of self-awareness in eating disorders. Midfrontal theta reactivity to conflict and error are linked to externalizing and internalizing respectively. Midfrontal conflict theta and parietal P300 are linked to a latent factor of DSM externalising disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1