Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy Is Associated with Decreased Postoperative Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio.

Journal of Pancreatic Cancer Pub Date : 2020-05-12 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1089/pancan.2019.0020
Richard Zheng, Olivia Wang, Emma Bradley, Harish Lavu, Jordan R Winter, Ernest L Rosato, Francesco Palazzo, Charles J Yeo, Adam C Berger
{"title":"Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy Is Associated with Decreased Postoperative Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio.","authors":"Richard Zheng,&nbsp;Olivia Wang,&nbsp;Emma Bradley,&nbsp;Harish Lavu,&nbsp;Jordan R Winter,&nbsp;Ernest L Rosato,&nbsp;Francesco Palazzo,&nbsp;Charles J Yeo,&nbsp;Adam C Berger","doi":"10.1089/pancan.2019.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a marker of inflammation that has been investigated as a prognostic factor in many diseases. We hypothesized that NLR would be lower in patients undergoing minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP). <b>Methods:</b> Using a prospective database, we identified patients who underwent open or minimally invasive (laparoscopic/robotic) distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy from 2006 to 2018. Patients were grouped according to their type of surgery and matched by age, gender, and benign or malignant pathology. The NLR was calculated from a complete blood count with differential on the second postoperative day. Statistical calculations were performed in Stata (v13.0). <b>Results:</b> A total of 106 patients were included, with 53 MIDP and 53 open cases. MIDP was associated with a significantly lower postoperative NLR than open surgery (13.3 vs. 17.2, <i>p</i> = 0.01). NLR did not vary significantly between patients who developed complications and those who did not (15.4 vs. 15.3, <i>p</i> = 0.95). Patients undergoing MIDP had decreased length of postoperative hospital stay (4 days vs. 5 days, <i>p</i> = 0.003). Multivariable linear regression failed to find a significant decrease in NLR with the use of laparoscopy (<i>p</i> = 0.14) when accounting for age, body mass index, surgical blood loss, pathology, and operative time as covariates. <b>Conclusion:</b> The NLR is significantly decreased when performing MIDP versus open distal pancreatectomy, but correlation with clinical outcomes has yet to be proven.</p>","PeriodicalId":16655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pancreatic Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/pancan.2019.0020","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pancreatic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pancan.2019.0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a marker of inflammation that has been investigated as a prognostic factor in many diseases. We hypothesized that NLR would be lower in patients undergoing minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP). Methods: Using a prospective database, we identified patients who underwent open or minimally invasive (laparoscopic/robotic) distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy from 2006 to 2018. Patients were grouped according to their type of surgery and matched by age, gender, and benign or malignant pathology. The NLR was calculated from a complete blood count with differential on the second postoperative day. Statistical calculations were performed in Stata (v13.0). Results: A total of 106 patients were included, with 53 MIDP and 53 open cases. MIDP was associated with a significantly lower postoperative NLR than open surgery (13.3 vs. 17.2, p = 0.01). NLR did not vary significantly between patients who developed complications and those who did not (15.4 vs. 15.3, p = 0.95). Patients undergoing MIDP had decreased length of postoperative hospital stay (4 days vs. 5 days, p = 0.003). Multivariable linear regression failed to find a significant decrease in NLR with the use of laparoscopy (p = 0.14) when accounting for age, body mass index, surgical blood loss, pathology, and operative time as covariates. Conclusion: The NLR is significantly decreased when performing MIDP versus open distal pancreatectomy, but correlation with clinical outcomes has yet to be proven.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微创远端胰腺切除术与术后中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值降低有关。
目的:中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)是炎症的标志,已被研究为许多疾病的预后因素。我们假设行微创远端胰腺切除术(MIDP)的患者NLR会更低。方法:使用前瞻性数据库,我们确定了2006年至2018年期间接受开放或微创(腹腔镜/机器人)远端胰腺切除术和脾切除术的患者。患者根据手术类型进行分组,并根据年龄、性别和良性或恶性病理进行匹配。NLR通过术后第二天的全血细胞计数计算。统计计算在Stata (v13.0)中执行。结果:共纳入106例患者,其中MIDP 53例,开放性53例。与开放手术相比,MIDP术后NLR显著降低(13.3 vs. 17.2, p = 0.01)。NLR在出现并发症的患者和没有出现并发症的患者之间没有显著差异(15.4 vs 15.3, p = 0.95)。接受MIDP的患者术后住院时间缩短(4天比5天,p = 0.003)。当考虑到年龄、体重指数、手术出血量、病理和手术时间作为协变量时,多变量线性回归未能发现使用腹腔镜后NLR的显著降低(p = 0.14)。结论:与开放式远端胰腺切除术相比,行MIDP时NLR明显降低,但与临床结果的相关性尚未得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integration of Specialized Palliative Care with Oncological Treatment in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders and Outcomes for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer. "Infiltrative" Versus "Mass-Forming" Pancreatic Cancer: A New Radiological Classification System for Pancreatic Head Ductal Carcinoma and Its Pathological Correlation. Biliary Leakage Following Pancreatoduodenectomy: Experience from a High-Volume Center. Isolated Ovarian Metastasis from Pancreatic Cancer Mimicking Primary Ovarian Neoplasia: Role of Molecular Analysis in Determining Diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1