Effectiveness of Pit and Fissure Sealants for Preventing and Arresting Occlusal Caries in Primary Molars: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 4 4区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jebdp.2020.101404
Phoebe P.Y. Lam BDS , Divesh Sardana BDS , Manikandan Ekambaram BDS, MDS, PhD, FDS, RCSEd, MPaed Dent, RCSEd, MRACDS(Paed) , Gillian H.M. Lee BDS, MDS, Adv Dip Paed Dent HK, PhD, M Paed Dent RCS, MRACDS (Paed), FHKAM, FCDSHK, FDS RCSEd , Cynthia K.Y. Yiu BDS, MDS, PhD, FHKAM (Dental Surgery), FCDSHK (Paediatric Dentistry)
{"title":"Effectiveness of Pit and Fissure Sealants for Preventing and Arresting Occlusal Caries in Primary Molars: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Phoebe P.Y. Lam BDS ,&nbsp;Divesh Sardana BDS ,&nbsp;Manikandan Ekambaram BDS, MDS, PhD, FDS, RCSEd, MPaed Dent, RCSEd, MRACDS(Paed) ,&nbsp;Gillian H.M. Lee BDS, MDS, Adv Dip Paed Dent HK, PhD, M Paed Dent RCS, MRACDS (Paed), FHKAM, FCDSHK, FDS RCSEd ,&nbsp;Cynthia K.Y. Yiu BDS, MDS, PhD, FHKAM (Dental Surgery), FCDSHK (Paediatric Dentistry)","doi":"10.1016/j.jebdp.2020.101404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>The use of pit and fissure sealants have been well supported in permanent teeth, but no concrete evidence is available to support this procedure in </span>primary molars<span>. This review aims to systematically assess randomized controlled trials<span> and summarize the evidence on the effectiveness of different sealants in prevention and arrest of the pit and fissure occlusal caries in primary molars of children.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Four electronic databases were searched from inception to March 2018. Seven studies were included in the qualitative and quantitative syntheses. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool, and evaluated the certainty in the evidence adopting the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation approach. Odds ratio and retention rate of different sealants were recalculated and analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>This review identified no significant difference in the overall caries incidence and progression when evaluated over 24 months between (1) resin-based sealant (RBS) and glass ionomer sealants (GIS) or resin-modified GIS; (2) conventional and newly developed RBS; (3) autopolymerized and light-polymerized RBS; (4) RBS with </span>topical fluoride application and topical fluoride alone; and (5) RBS with topical fluoride application and resin infiltration with topical fluoride application. The pooled estimates of the mean retention rates of RBS and GIS on primary molars over an 18-months period were 85.94% and 23.18%, respectively. The certainty in the evidence of each outcome was determined as low or very low mainly because of high risk of overall bias and imprecision.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There are currently insufficient well-controlled randomized controlled clinical trials to determine whether sealants are beneficial in preventing or arresting noncavitated occlusal caries in the primary molars.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48736,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","volume":"20 2","pages":"Article 101404"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jebdp.2020.101404","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532338220300087","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Objective

The use of pit and fissure sealants have been well supported in permanent teeth, but no concrete evidence is available to support this procedure in primary molars. This review aims to systematically assess randomized controlled trials and summarize the evidence on the effectiveness of different sealants in prevention and arrest of the pit and fissure occlusal caries in primary molars of children.

Materials and methods

Four electronic databases were searched from inception to March 2018. Seven studies were included in the qualitative and quantitative syntheses. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool, and evaluated the certainty in the evidence adopting the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation approach. Odds ratio and retention rate of different sealants were recalculated and analyzed.

Results

This review identified no significant difference in the overall caries incidence and progression when evaluated over 24 months between (1) resin-based sealant (RBS) and glass ionomer sealants (GIS) or resin-modified GIS; (2) conventional and newly developed RBS; (3) autopolymerized and light-polymerized RBS; (4) RBS with topical fluoride application and topical fluoride alone; and (5) RBS with topical fluoride application and resin infiltration with topical fluoride application. The pooled estimates of the mean retention rates of RBS and GIS on primary molars over an 18-months period were 85.94% and 23.18%, respectively. The certainty in the evidence of each outcome was determined as low or very low mainly because of high risk of overall bias and imprecision.

Conclusion

There are currently insufficient well-controlled randomized controlled clinical trials to determine whether sealants are beneficial in preventing or arresting noncavitated occlusal caries in the primary molars.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙窝和牙缝封闭剂预防和抑制初生磨牙合龋的有效性:系统综述和荟萃分析
目的在恒牙中应用窝沟封闭剂得到了很好的支持,但在初生磨牙中没有具体的证据支持这种方法。本综述旨在系统评估随机对照试验,并总结不同密封剂在预防和遏制儿童乳牙牙槽牙合龋的有效性的证据。材料与方法检索自成立至2018年3月的4个电子数据库。定性和定量综合包括七项研究。两位审稿人独立选择研究,提取数据,使用修订后的Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险,并采用建议分级评估发展和评估方法评估证据的确定性。重新计算并分析不同密封胶的优势比和固位率。结果:本综述发现,在24个月内,树脂基密封剂(RBS)与玻璃离子密封剂(GIS)或树脂改性GIS在总体龋发病率和进展方面没有显著差异;(2)传统的和新开发的RBS;(3)自聚合和光聚合RBS;(4) RBS加局部氟化物和单独局部氟化物;(5)外用氟化物的RBS和外用氟化物的树脂浸润。在18个月的时间里,RBS和GIS在初生磨牙上的平均保留率分别为85.94%和23.18%。每个结果的证据的确定性被确定为低或非常低,主要是因为总体偏倚和不精确的风险很高。结论目前尚缺乏良好对照的随机对照临床试验来确定密封剂是否有利于预防或抑制乳牙非空腔性牙合龋。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice presents timely original articles, as well as reviews of articles on the results and outcomes of clinical procedures and treatment. The Journal advocates the use or rejection of a procedure based on solid, clinical evidence found in literature. The Journal''s dynamic operating principles are explicitness in process and objectives, publication of the highest-quality reviews and original articles, and an emphasis on objectivity.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Information for Readers Statement of Purpose/Levels of Evidence Information for Authors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1