Association between lumbopelvic motion and muscle activation in patients with non-specific low back pain during forward bending task: A cross-sectional study.

Pub Date : 2020-06-01 Epub Date: 2019-12-30 DOI:10.1142/S1013702520500043
Peemongkon Wattananon, Komsak Sinsurin, Sirikarn Somprasong
{"title":"Association between lumbopelvic motion and muscle activation in patients with non-specific low back pain during forward bending task: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Peemongkon Wattananon,&nbsp;Komsak Sinsurin,&nbsp;Sirikarn Somprasong","doi":"10.1142/S1013702520500043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence suggests patients with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) have altered lumbar and pelvic movement patterns. These changes could be associated with altered patterns of muscle activation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to determine: (1) differences in the relative contributions and velocity of lumbar and pelvic movements between people with and without NSLBP, (2) the differences in lumbopelvic muscle activation patterns between people with and without NSLBP, and (3) the association between lumbar and pelvic movements and lumbopelvic muscle activation patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects (8 healthy individuals and 8 patients with NSLBP) performed 2 sets of 3 repetitions of active forward bending, while motion and muscle activity data were collected simultaneously. Data derived were lumbar and pelvic ranges of motion and velocity, and ipsilateral and contralateral lumbopelvic muscle activities (internal oblique/transverse abdominis (IO/TA), lumbar multifidus (LM), erector spinae (ES) and gluteus maximus (GM) muscles).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lumbar and pelvic motions showed trends, but exceeded 95% confidence minimal detectable difference <math><mo>(</mo></math> MDD <math><msub><mrow></mrow> <mrow><mn>95</mn></mrow> </msub> <mo>)</mo></math> , for greater pelvic motion <math><mo>(</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>06</mn> <mo>)</mo></math> , less lumbar motion <math><mo>(</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>23</mn> <mo>)</mo></math> among patients with NSLBP. Significantly less activity was observed in the GM muscles bilaterally <math><mo>(</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>05</mn> <mo>)</mo></math> in the NSLBP group. A significant association <math><mo>(</mo> <mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>8</mn></math> , <math><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>02</mn> <mo>)</mo></math> was found between ipsilateral ES muscle activity and lumbar motion, while moderate, but statistically non-significant associations, were found between GM muscle activity bilaterally and lumbar velocity <math><mo>(</mo></math> ipsilateral: <math><mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>6</mn></math> , <math><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>14</mn></math> ; contralateral: <math><mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>6</mn></math> , <math><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>16</mn> <mo>)</mo></math> in the NSLBP group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings indicated patients had greater pelvic contribution, but less lumbar contribution which was associated with less activation of the GM bilaterally.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/S1013702520500043","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S1013702520500043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Evidence suggests patients with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) have altered lumbar and pelvic movement patterns. These changes could be associated with altered patterns of muscle activation.

Objective: The study aimed to determine: (1) differences in the relative contributions and velocity of lumbar and pelvic movements between people with and without NSLBP, (2) the differences in lumbopelvic muscle activation patterns between people with and without NSLBP, and (3) the association between lumbar and pelvic movements and lumbopelvic muscle activation patterns.

Methods: Subjects (8 healthy individuals and 8 patients with NSLBP) performed 2 sets of 3 repetitions of active forward bending, while motion and muscle activity data were collected simultaneously. Data derived were lumbar and pelvic ranges of motion and velocity, and ipsilateral and contralateral lumbopelvic muscle activities (internal oblique/transverse abdominis (IO/TA), lumbar multifidus (LM), erector spinae (ES) and gluteus maximus (GM) muscles).

Results: Lumbar and pelvic motions showed trends, but exceeded 95% confidence minimal detectable difference ( MDD 95 ) , for greater pelvic motion ( p = 0 . 06 ) , less lumbar motion ( p = 0 . 23 ) among patients with NSLBP. Significantly less activity was observed in the GM muscles bilaterally ( p < 0 . 05 ) in the NSLBP group. A significant association ( r = - 0 . 8 , p = 0 . 02 ) was found between ipsilateral ES muscle activity and lumbar motion, while moderate, but statistically non-significant associations, were found between GM muscle activity bilaterally and lumbar velocity ( ipsilateral: r = - 0 . 6 , p = 0 . 14 ; contralateral: r = - 0 . 6 , p = 0 . 16 ) in the NSLBP group.

Conclusion: Findings indicated patients had greater pelvic contribution, but less lumbar contribution which was associated with less activation of the GM bilaterally.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
前屈任务中非特异性下腰痛患者腰骨盆运动和肌肉激活之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
背景:有证据表明,非特异性腰痛(NSLBP)患者腰部和骨盆运动模式发生改变。这些变化可能与肌肉激活模式的改变有关。目的:本研究旨在确定:(1)有无NSLBP患者腰骨盆运动的相对贡献和速度的差异;(2)有无NSLBP患者腰骨盆肌肉激活模式的差异;(3)腰骨盆运动与腰骨盆肌肉激活模式之间的关联。方法:受试者(8名健康个体和8名非slbp患者)进行2组3次重复的主动前屈动作,同时收集运动和肌肉活动数据。数据来源于腰椎和骨盆的运动范围和速度,以及同侧和对侧腰骨盆肌肉活动(腹内斜/横肌(IO/TA)、腰椎多裂肌(LM)、竖脊肌(ES)和臀大肌(GM))。结果:腰椎和骨盆运动显示出趋势,但超过95%的置信度最小可检测差异(MDD 95),骨盆运动更大(p = 0。06),腰椎运动较少(p = 0。23)非slbp患者。双侧GM肌肉活动明显减少(p < 0.05)。NSLBP组0.05)。显著相关性(r = - 0)。8, p = 0。02)在同侧ES肌活动和腰椎运动之间发现,而在双侧GM肌活动和腰椎速度之间发现中度但统计学上不显著的关联(同侧:r = - 0)。6, p = 0。14;对侧:r = - 0。6, p = 0。16) NSLBP组。结论:研究结果表明,患者有较大的盆腔贡献,但腰椎贡献较少,这与双侧GM的激活较少有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1