Responsiveness of pain, functional capacity tests, and disability level in individuals with chronic nonspecific low back pain.

Pub Date : 2020-06-01 Epub Date: 2019-12-06 DOI:10.1142/S101370252050002X
Prasert Sakulsriprasert, Roongtiwa Vachalathiti, Pathaimas Kingcha
{"title":"Responsiveness of pain, functional capacity tests, and disability level in individuals with chronic nonspecific low back pain.","authors":"Prasert Sakulsriprasert,&nbsp;Roongtiwa Vachalathiti,&nbsp;Pathaimas Kingcha","doi":"10.1142/S101370252050002X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical outcomes are very important in clinical assessment, and responsiveness is a component inside the outcome measures that needs to be investigated, particularly in chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the responsiveness of pain, functional capacity tests, and disability in individuals with CNSLBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty subjects were assessed in pain using the following methods: visual analog scale (VAS) and numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), functional capacity tests: functional reach test (FRT), five-time sit-to-stand test (5 TSST), and two-minute step test (2 MST), and disability level: modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ), Thai version before and after 2-week intervention session. For interventions, the subjects received education, spinal manipulative therapy, and individual therapeutic exercise twice a week, for a total of two weeks. The statistics analyzed were change scores, effect size (ES), and standardized response mean (SRM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most responsive parameter for individuals with CNSLBP was pain as measured by numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) (ES -0.986, SRM -0.928) and five-time sit-to-stand test (5 TSST) (SRM -0.846).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that NPRS pain and 5 TSST were responsive in individuals with CNSLBP at two weeks after the beginning of interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/S101370252050002X","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S101370252050002X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: Clinical outcomes are very important in clinical assessment, and responsiveness is a component inside the outcome measures that needs to be investigated, particularly in chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP).

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the responsiveness of pain, functional capacity tests, and disability in individuals with CNSLBP.

Methods: Twenty subjects were assessed in pain using the following methods: visual analog scale (VAS) and numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), functional capacity tests: functional reach test (FRT), five-time sit-to-stand test (5 TSST), and two-minute step test (2 MST), and disability level: modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ), Thai version before and after 2-week intervention session. For interventions, the subjects received education, spinal manipulative therapy, and individual therapeutic exercise twice a week, for a total of two weeks. The statistics analyzed were change scores, effect size (ES), and standardized response mean (SRM).

Results: The most responsive parameter for individuals with CNSLBP was pain as measured by numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) (ES -0.986, SRM -0.928) and five-time sit-to-stand test (5 TSST) (SRM -0.846).

Conclusion: This study found that NPRS pain and 5 TSST were responsive in individuals with CNSLBP at two weeks after the beginning of interventions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
慢性非特异性腰痛患者的疼痛反应性、功能能力测试和残疾水平
背景:临床结果在临床评估中非常重要,反应性是需要调查的结果测量中的一个组成部分,特别是在慢性非特异性腰痛(CNSLBP)中。目的:本研究旨在探讨CNSLBP患者的疼痛反应性、功能能力测试和残疾。方法:采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和数字疼痛评定量表(NPRS)对20名受试者进行疼痛评估,功能能力测试:功能到达测试(FRT)、5次坐立测试(5次TSST)和2分钟步数测试(2分钟步数测试),残疾水平:改良Oswestry残疾问卷(MODQ),泰国版干预前后。在干预方面,受试者接受教育、脊柱推拿治疗和个人治疗性运动,每周两次,共两周。统计分析为改变评分、效应量(ES)和标准化反应均值(SRM)。结果:CNSLBP患者最具反应性的参数为疼痛,测量方法为数值疼痛评定量表(NPRS) (ES -0.986, SRM -0.928)和5次坐立测试(5 TSST) (SRM -0.846)。结论:本研究发现,在干预开始后两周,NPRS疼痛和5 - TSST对CNSLBP患者有反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1