Cost-effectiveness of self-injected DMPA-SC compared with health-worker-injected DMPA-IM in Senegal

Q2 Medicine Contraception: X Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.conx.2019.100012
Mercy Mvundura , Laura Di Giorgio , Chloe Morozoff , Jane Cover , Marguerite Ndour , Jennifer Kidwell Drake
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of self-injected DMPA-SC compared with health-worker-injected DMPA-IM in Senegal","authors":"Mercy Mvundura ,&nbsp;Laura Di Giorgio ,&nbsp;Chloe Morozoff ,&nbsp;Jane Cover ,&nbsp;Marguerite Ndour ,&nbsp;Jennifer Kidwell Drake","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2019.100012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of self-injected subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) compared to health-worker-administered intramuscular DMPA (DMPA-IM) in Senegal and to assess how including practice or demonstration injections in client self-injection training affects estimates.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We developed a decision-tree model with a 12-month time horizon for a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 injectable contraceptive users in Senegal. We used the model to estimate incremental costs per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted. The analysis derived model inputs from DMPA-SC self-injection continuation and costing research studies and peer-reviewed literature. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness from societal and health system perspectives and conducted one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of results.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared to health-worker-administered DMPA-IM, self-injected DMPA-SC could prevent 1402 additional unintended pregnancies and avert 204 maternal DALYs per year for this hypothetical cohort. From a societal perspective, self-injection costs less than health worker administration regardless of the training approach and is therefore dominant. From the health system perspective, self-injection is dominant compared to health worker administration if a one-page instruction sheet is used and one additional DMPA-SC unit is used for training and is cost-effective at $208 per DALY averted when two additional DMPA-SC units are used. Sensitivity analysis showed estimates were robust.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Self-injected DMPA-SC averted more pregnancies and DALYs and cost less from the societal perspective compared to health-worker-administered DMPA-IM and hence is dominant. Using fewer DMPA-SC units for practice or demonstration improves cost-effectiveness of self-injection from the health system perspective.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Evidence from Senegal shows that self-injection of DMPA-SC can be dominant or cost-effective from both health system and societal perspectives relative to DMPA-IM from health workers even if women practice injecting or health workers demonstrate with one or two DMPA-SC units. Evidence on whether practice or demonstration is required for client training would be useful.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"1 ","pages":"Article 100012"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2019.100012","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151619300115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of self-injected subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) compared to health-worker-administered intramuscular DMPA (DMPA-IM) in Senegal and to assess how including practice or demonstration injections in client self-injection training affects estimates.

Study design

We developed a decision-tree model with a 12-month time horizon for a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 injectable contraceptive users in Senegal. We used the model to estimate incremental costs per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted. The analysis derived model inputs from DMPA-SC self-injection continuation and costing research studies and peer-reviewed literature. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness from societal and health system perspectives and conducted one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of results.

Results

Compared to health-worker-administered DMPA-IM, self-injected DMPA-SC could prevent 1402 additional unintended pregnancies and avert 204 maternal DALYs per year for this hypothetical cohort. From a societal perspective, self-injection costs less than health worker administration regardless of the training approach and is therefore dominant. From the health system perspective, self-injection is dominant compared to health worker administration if a one-page instruction sheet is used and one additional DMPA-SC unit is used for training and is cost-effective at $208 per DALY averted when two additional DMPA-SC units are used. Sensitivity analysis showed estimates were robust.

Conclusions

Self-injected DMPA-SC averted more pregnancies and DALYs and cost less from the societal perspective compared to health-worker-administered DMPA-IM and hence is dominant. Using fewer DMPA-SC units for practice or demonstration improves cost-effectiveness of self-injection from the health system perspective.

Implications

Evidence from Senegal shows that self-injection of DMPA-SC can be dominant or cost-effective from both health system and societal perspectives relative to DMPA-IM from health workers even if women practice injecting or health workers demonstrate with one or two DMPA-SC units. Evidence on whether practice or demonstration is required for client training would be useful.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塞内加尔自注射DMPA-SC与卫生工作者注射DMPA-IM的成本效益比较
目的评价自注射皮下储存醋酸甲羟孕酮(DMPA- sc)与卫生工作者肌肉注射DMPA (DMPA- im)在塞内加尔的成本效益,并评估在客户自我注射培训中纳入实践或示范注射如何影响评估。研究设计我们为塞内加尔10万注射避孕药使用者的假设队列开发了一个具有12个月时间范围的决策树模型。我们使用该模型来估计每个残疾调整生命年(DALY)避免的增量成本。分析的模型输入来自DMPA-SC自注射延续和成本研究以及同行评议的文献。我们从社会和卫生系统的角度评估了成本效益,并进行了单向和概率敏感性分析,以检验结果的稳健性。结果与卫生工作者给药的DMPA-IM相比,在这个假设的队列中,自注射DMPA-SC每年可以预防1402例额外的意外怀孕,避免204例产妇DALYs。从社会角度来看,无论采用何种培训方法,自我注射的成本都低于卫生工作者管理,因此占主导地位。从卫生系统的角度来看,如果使用一页说明书,并使用一个额外的DMPA-SC单位进行培训,与卫生工作者管理相比,自我注射占主导地位,如果使用两个额外的DMPA-SC单位,则成本效益为每减少208美元。敏感性分析显示估计是稳健的。结论从社会角度来看,自注射DMPA-SC比卫生工作者给药DMPA-IM能避免更多的妊娠和DALYs,成本更低,因此具有优势。从卫生系统的角度来看,使用较少的DMPA-SC单位进行实践或示范可提高自我注射的成本效益。来自塞内加尔的证据表明,从卫生系统和社会的角度来看,相对于卫生工作者的DMPA-IM,自我注射DMPA-SC可能占主导地位或具有成本效益,即使妇女进行注射或卫生工作者展示了一个或两个DMPA-SC单位。关于客户培训是否需要实践或演示的证据将是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception: X
Contraception: X Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Outpatient medical management of later second trimester abortion (18–23.6 weeks) with procedural evacuation backup: A large case series Experiences of delay-causing obstacles and mental health at the time of abortion seeking Maximizing the effectiveness of 1.5 mg levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: The case for precoital use How does person-centered maternity care relate to postpartum contraceptive counseling and use? Evidence from a longitudinal study of women delivering at health facilities in Ethiopia Dilation and evacuation versus medication abortion at 15–24 weeks of gestation in low-middle income country: A retrospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1