Discrimination and structural validity evaluation of Zung self-rating depression scale for pregnant women in China.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2022-03-01 Epub Date: 2020-06-04 DOI:10.1080/0167482X.2020.1770221
Xinning Chen, Weihong Hu, Yao Hu, Xian Xia, Xiaotian Li
{"title":"Discrimination and structural validity evaluation of Zung self-rating depression scale for pregnant women in China.","authors":"Xinning Chen,&nbsp;Weihong Hu,&nbsp;Yao Hu,&nbsp;Xian Xia,&nbsp;Xiaotian Li","doi":"10.1080/0167482X.2020.1770221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The applicability of the Zung self-rating depression scale (SDS) in pregnancy is unknown. We aimed to identify redundant items and evaluate the Zung SDS's structural validity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Two samples of pregnant women were invited from two districts in Shanghai (Yangpu sample, <i>n</i> = 6468 and Huangpu sample, <i>n</i> = 402). The Yangpu sample was randomly split into YGroup1/2/3. Item's properties were evaluated <i>via</i> the item response theory in YGroup1. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were correspondingly executed in YGroup2 and YGroup3. Those items with discrimination parameter (α) lower than 0.65 or factor loading smaller than 0.4 were deleted from the scale. The final structure was validated in the Huangpu sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Items 4 (sleep), 7 (weight loss), 8 (constipation) and 9 (tachyarrhythmia) exhibited low discrimination power. Items 2 (diurnal variation), 5 (appetite), 10 (fatigue) and 19 (suicide idea) made a low contribution to all factors. A three-factor model was eventually constructed as cognitive (Items 14, 16, 17, 18 and 20), psychomotor (Items 6, 11 and 12) and affective (Items 1, 3, 13 and 15).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Zung SDS needs modification before applied to pregnant women in China. The items describing the overlap symptoms of the physical change in pregnancy and mood disorder should be deleted.</p>","PeriodicalId":50072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"43 1","pages":"26-34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0167482X.2020.1770221","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2020.1770221","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Purpose: The applicability of the Zung self-rating depression scale (SDS) in pregnancy is unknown. We aimed to identify redundant items and evaluate the Zung SDS's structural validity.

Method: Two samples of pregnant women were invited from two districts in Shanghai (Yangpu sample, n = 6468 and Huangpu sample, n = 402). The Yangpu sample was randomly split into YGroup1/2/3. Item's properties were evaluated via the item response theory in YGroup1. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were correspondingly executed in YGroup2 and YGroup3. Those items with discrimination parameter (α) lower than 0.65 or factor loading smaller than 0.4 were deleted from the scale. The final structure was validated in the Huangpu sample.

Results: Items 4 (sleep), 7 (weight loss), 8 (constipation) and 9 (tachyarrhythmia) exhibited low discrimination power. Items 2 (diurnal variation), 5 (appetite), 10 (fatigue) and 19 (suicide idea) made a low contribution to all factors. A three-factor model was eventually constructed as cognitive (Items 14, 16, 17, 18 and 20), psychomotor (Items 6, 11 and 12) and affective (Items 1, 3, 13 and 15).

Conclusion: The Zung SDS needs modification before applied to pregnant women in China. The items describing the overlap symptoms of the physical change in pregnancy and mood disorder should be deleted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国孕妇抑郁症Zung自评量表的歧视及结构效度评价。
目的:尚不清楚Zung抑郁自评量表(SDS)在妊娠期的适用性。我们的目的是找出多余的项目,并评估Zung SDS的结构效度。方法:从上海市2个区(杨浦区,n = 6468;黄埔区,n = 402)抽取2份孕妇样本。杨浦样本随机分为YGroup1/2/3。在YGroup1中,通过项目反应理论评估项目的属性。YGroup2和YGroup3分别进行探索性和验证性因素分析。区分参数(α)小于0.65或因子负荷小于0.4的条目被删除。最终的结构在黄埔样品中得到了验证。结果:第4项(睡眠)、第7项(体重减轻)、第8项(便秘)和第9项(心动过速)的辨别能力较低。第2项(日变化)、第5项(食欲)、第10项(疲劳)和第19项(自杀意念)对各因素的贡献率均较低。最终构建了认知(项目14、16、17、18和20)、精神运动(项目6、11和12)和情感(项目1、3、13和15)的三因素模型。结论:Zung SDS在中国孕妇应用前需要修改。应删除描述妊娠期生理变化与心境障碍重叠症状的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology was founded in 1982 in order to provide a scientific forum for obstetricians, gynecologists, psychiatrists and psychologists, academic health professionals as well as for all those who are interested in the psychosocial and psychosomatic aspects of women’s health. Another of its aims is to stimulate obstetricians and gynecologists to pay more attention to this very important facet of their profession.
期刊最新文献
Retracted article: The effects of fish oil omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on mental health parameters and metabolic status of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Effect of social support on fetal movement self-monitoring behavior in Chinese women: a moderated mediation model of health beliefs. The role and outcomes of music therapy during pregnancy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Assessment of factors related to poly cystic ovarian syndrome - A comparative and correlational study. Investigating socioeconomic disparities of Kangaroo mother care on preterm infant health outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1