Not Only Virus Spread: The Diffusion of Ageism during the Outbreak of COVID-19.

IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY Journal of Aging & Social Policy Pub Date : 2020-07-01 Epub Date: 2020-06-06 DOI:10.1080/08959420.2020.1772002
Federica Previtali, Laura D Allen, Maria Varlamova
{"title":"Not Only Virus Spread: The Diffusion of Ageism during the Outbreak of COVID-19.","authors":"Federica Previtali,&nbsp;Laura D Allen,&nbsp;Maria Varlamova","doi":"10.1080/08959420.2020.1772002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, we face an exacerbation of ageism as well as a flourish of intergenerational solidarity. The use of chronological age is an unjustified threshold for the creation of public policies to control the spreading of the virus; doing so reinforces intrapersonal and interpersonal negative age stereotypes and violates older persons' human rights to autonomy, proper care treatment, work, and equality. By overlooking differences within age groups, measures formulated solely on the basis of age are unable to target beneficiaries' needs. Concurrently, several initiatives are trying to overcome ageist practices by providing different types of assistance to older adults on the basis of need rather than chronological age. The Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Network EuroAgeism calls on policymakers to refrain from ageist practices and language, as they exacerbate our ability to meet the COVID-19 crisis and future emergencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","volume":" ","pages":"506-514"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08959420.2020.1772002","citationCount":"116","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2020.1772002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 116

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, we face an exacerbation of ageism as well as a flourish of intergenerational solidarity. The use of chronological age is an unjustified threshold for the creation of public policies to control the spreading of the virus; doing so reinforces intrapersonal and interpersonal negative age stereotypes and violates older persons' human rights to autonomy, proper care treatment, work, and equality. By overlooking differences within age groups, measures formulated solely on the basis of age are unable to target beneficiaries' needs. Concurrently, several initiatives are trying to overcome ageist practices by providing different types of assistance to older adults on the basis of need rather than chronological age. The Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Network EuroAgeism calls on policymakers to refrain from ageist practices and language, as they exacerbate our ability to meet the COVID-19 crisis and future emergencies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不仅仅是病毒传播:COVID-19爆发期间年龄歧视的扩散
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,我们面临着年龄歧视的加剧和代际团结的蓬勃发展。使用实足年龄是制定控制病毒传播的公共政策的不合理门槛;这样做会强化个人内部和人际之间对年龄的负面刻板印象,并侵犯老年人享有自主、适当护理治疗、工作和平等的人权。由于忽视年龄组内的差异,仅根据年龄制订的措施无法针对受益人的需要。同时,若干倡议正在努力克服年龄歧视做法,根据需要而不是实际年龄向老年人提供不同类型的援助。Marie Skłodowska-Curie EuroAgeism创新培训网络呼吁政策制定者不要采取歧视年龄的做法和语言,因为这些做法和语言会加剧我们应对2019冠状病毒病危机和未来紧急情况的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
3.90%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging & Social Policy offers a platform for insightful contributions from an international and interdisciplinary group of policy analysts and scholars. It provides an in-depth examination and analysis of critical phenomena that impact aging and the development and implementation of programs for the elderly from a global perspective, with a broad scope that encompasses not only the United States but also regions including Europe, the Middle East, Australia, Latin America, Asia, and the Asia-Pacific rim. The journal regularly addresses a wide array of issues such as long-term services and supports, home- and community-based care, nursing-home care, assisted living, long-term care financing, financial security, employment and training, public and private pension coverage, housing, transportation, health care access, financing, and quality, family dynamics, and retirement. These topics are of significant importance to the field of aging and social policy, reflecting the journal's commitment to presenting a comprehensive view of the challenges and solutions related to aging populations around the world.
期刊最新文献
The Landscape of Aging Research: Topic Discovery and Country-Level Contributions Through Text Mining. Socioeconomic Status and Depression Among Low-Education Disabled Oldest-Old in China: A Serial Multiple Mediation Analysis. Inequality in Social Security Benefits: Exploring the Relationship Between Functional Disability and Subjective Well-Being Among Older Adults in China. Understanding the Role: Promoting Agency and Informed Decision-Making in Family Caregiving. Long-Term Care in Remote Settings: A Qualitative Case Study on Lāna'i, Hawai'i.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1