Mozart's or Ambient Music do not Affect Autoalgometric Pain Threshold.

IF 1.1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Translational Medicine at UniSa Pub Date : 2020-05-31 eCollection Date: 2020-05-01
N Vecchione, L Lorusso, A Viggiano
{"title":"Mozart's or Ambient Music do not Affect Autoalgometric Pain Threshold.","authors":"N Vecchione,&nbsp;L Lorusso,&nbsp;A Viggiano","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nowadays, researchers and clinicians are increasingly interested in alternative non-pharmacological treatments, and music therapy seems to have additional and powerful effects on different pathologies and pain. However, since pain is a subjective perception, it is difficult to evaluate if and which effect music has on it. In this study, a new device and method have been introduced to objectively estimate pain threshold and its changes related to external stimuli. The above-mentioned device, called autoalgometer, allows to evaluate pain threshold changes while listening to music or other sounds. In this experiment, the pain threshold was evaluated in twenty-seven volunteers after listening to one out of three different soundtracks: white noise, Mozart's sonata K448 or Brian Eno's ambient music. Compared to staying in silence, listening to the recordings had no significant effect on pain threshold, and the results did not show any significant difference between the experimental groups. Probably, the positive effect of music described in other studies can be ascribed to a psychological effect, meaning that music can improve subjective mood and, thus, modify pain perception.</p>","PeriodicalId":54170,"journal":{"name":"Translational Medicine at UniSa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7265910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Medicine at UniSa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nowadays, researchers and clinicians are increasingly interested in alternative non-pharmacological treatments, and music therapy seems to have additional and powerful effects on different pathologies and pain. However, since pain is a subjective perception, it is difficult to evaluate if and which effect music has on it. In this study, a new device and method have been introduced to objectively estimate pain threshold and its changes related to external stimuli. The above-mentioned device, called autoalgometer, allows to evaluate pain threshold changes while listening to music or other sounds. In this experiment, the pain threshold was evaluated in twenty-seven volunteers after listening to one out of three different soundtracks: white noise, Mozart's sonata K448 or Brian Eno's ambient music. Compared to staying in silence, listening to the recordings had no significant effect on pain threshold, and the results did not show any significant difference between the experimental groups. Probably, the positive effect of music described in other studies can be ascribed to a psychological effect, meaning that music can improve subjective mood and, thus, modify pain perception.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
莫扎特或环境音乐不影响疼痛阈值。
如今,研究人员和临床医生对替代非药物治疗越来越感兴趣,音乐治疗似乎对不同的病理和疼痛有额外和强大的作用。然而,由于疼痛是一种主观感知,很难评估音乐是否对疼痛有影响,以及音乐对疼痛有什么影响。在本研究中,我们引入了一种新的装置和方法来客观评估疼痛阈值及其与外界刺激相关的变化。上述装置被称为自动测痛仪,可以在听音乐或其他声音时评估疼痛阈值的变化。在这个实验中,27名志愿者在听了三种不同的音乐(白噪音、莫扎特的K448奏鸣曲和布莱恩·伊诺的环境音乐)中的一种后,对疼痛阈值进行了评估。与沉默相比,听录音对疼痛阈值无显著影响,实验组间无显著差异。也许,其他研究中描述的音乐的积极作用可以归因于一种心理效应,这意味着音乐可以改善主观情绪,从而改变疼痛感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Medicine at UniSa
Translational Medicine at UniSa MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Anaesthesiologist-led Multidisciplinary Model for Evaluating High-risk Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) Surgical Patients. Instrumental Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta and Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes: Literature Review and Observational Study. Physical Activity in Cancer Rehabilitation and Technology Acceptance: Results From the "Oncology in Motion" Project. Novel Targets and Strategies Addressing Residual Cardiovascular Risk in Post-acute Coronary Syndromes Patients. Telerehabilitation: A Solution for Patients After Hip Fracture?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1