Adherence to Iron-Folic Acid Supplementation and Associated Factors among Pregnant Women in Kasulu Communities in North-Western Tanzania.

International Journal of Reproductive Medicine Pub Date : 2020-06-04 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/3127245
Winfrida B Lyoba, Joyce D Mwakatoga, Charles Festo, Jackline Mrema, Ester Elisaria
{"title":"Adherence to Iron-Folic Acid Supplementation and Associated Factors among Pregnant Women in Kasulu Communities in North-Western Tanzania.","authors":"Winfrida B Lyoba,&nbsp;Joyce D Mwakatoga,&nbsp;Charles Festo,&nbsp;Jackline Mrema,&nbsp;Ester Elisaria","doi":"10.1155/2020/3127245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pregnant women are at a high risk of anaemia, with iron-folate deficiency being the most common cause of anaemia among pregnant women. Despite the well-known importance of iron and folic acid supplementation (IFAS) during pregnancy, adherence to these supplements is relatively low and associated factors were not well identified in the study area. This study is aimed at investigating adherence to IFAS and associated factors among pregnant women in Kasulu district, north-western Tanzania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A health facility cross-sectional survey with a mixed-method approach was conducted in Kasulu district from March to April 2019. A structured questionnaire was given to 320 women with children aged 0-6 months to assess factors associated with adherence to IFAS among pregnant women. Data were entered into SPSS version 22.0 for analysis. Binary logistic regression was further employed to determine the factors associated with adherence to IFAS. Focus group discussions were done with 19 pregnant women and 15 mothers of children aged 0-6 months to obtain more clarifications on the factors associated with adherence to IFAS. Furthermore, in-depth interviews were done with six health care providers to explore their perceptions of IFAS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 320 respondents of the survey, 20.3% (<i>n</i> = 65) adhered to IFAS. Factors associated with adherence to IFAS among pregnant women included time to start ANC (AOR = 3.72, 95% CI: 1.42, 9.79), knowledge of anaemia (AOR = 3.84, 95% CI: 1.335, 10.66), counseling on the importance of the iron-folic acid (AOR = 3.86, 95% CI: 1.42, 10.50), IFAS given during clinical visit (AOR = 15.72, 95% CI: 5.34, 46.31), number of meals consumed (AOR = 3.44, 95% CI: 1.28, 9.21), number of children (AOR = 3.462, 95% CI: 1.035, 11.58), and distance to health facility (AOR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.131, 0.886). Qualitative findings revealed that delayed first ANC visit, lack of remainder for pregnant women to take IFAS, low awareness about the negative effects of anaemia, low of knowledge of IFAS and management of side effects, negative beliefs about the use of IFAS, and follow-up mechanism were major reasons for poor adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adherence to iron-folic acid supplementation during pregnancy was low. Strengthening systems for creating reminding mechanism, raising community awareness through educational programs to pregnant women and health providers could improve adherence to IFAS.</p>","PeriodicalId":14379,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Reproductive Medicine","volume":"2020 ","pages":"3127245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/3127245","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Reproductive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3127245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Introduction: Pregnant women are at a high risk of anaemia, with iron-folate deficiency being the most common cause of anaemia among pregnant women. Despite the well-known importance of iron and folic acid supplementation (IFAS) during pregnancy, adherence to these supplements is relatively low and associated factors were not well identified in the study area. This study is aimed at investigating adherence to IFAS and associated factors among pregnant women in Kasulu district, north-western Tanzania.

Methods: A health facility cross-sectional survey with a mixed-method approach was conducted in Kasulu district from March to April 2019. A structured questionnaire was given to 320 women with children aged 0-6 months to assess factors associated with adherence to IFAS among pregnant women. Data were entered into SPSS version 22.0 for analysis. Binary logistic regression was further employed to determine the factors associated with adherence to IFAS. Focus group discussions were done with 19 pregnant women and 15 mothers of children aged 0-6 months to obtain more clarifications on the factors associated with adherence to IFAS. Furthermore, in-depth interviews were done with six health care providers to explore their perceptions of IFAS.

Results: Out of the 320 respondents of the survey, 20.3% (n = 65) adhered to IFAS. Factors associated with adherence to IFAS among pregnant women included time to start ANC (AOR = 3.72, 95% CI: 1.42, 9.79), knowledge of anaemia (AOR = 3.84, 95% CI: 1.335, 10.66), counseling on the importance of the iron-folic acid (AOR = 3.86, 95% CI: 1.42, 10.50), IFAS given during clinical visit (AOR = 15.72, 95% CI: 5.34, 46.31), number of meals consumed (AOR = 3.44, 95% CI: 1.28, 9.21), number of children (AOR = 3.462, 95% CI: 1.035, 11.58), and distance to health facility (AOR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.131, 0.886). Qualitative findings revealed that delayed first ANC visit, lack of remainder for pregnant women to take IFAS, low awareness about the negative effects of anaemia, low of knowledge of IFAS and management of side effects, negative beliefs about the use of IFAS, and follow-up mechanism were major reasons for poor adherence.

Conclusion: Adherence to iron-folic acid supplementation during pregnancy was low. Strengthening systems for creating reminding mechanism, raising community awareness through educational programs to pregnant women and health providers could improve adherence to IFAS.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
坦桑尼亚西北部Kasulu社区孕妇对叶酸铁补充剂的依从性及其相关因素
孕妇贫血的风险很高,叶酸铁缺乏是孕妇贫血的最常见原因。尽管在怀孕期间补充铁和叶酸(IFAS)的重要性众所周知,但这些补充剂的依从性相对较低,相关因素在研究区域也没有很好地确定。本研究旨在调查坦桑尼亚西北部Kasulu地区孕妇对IFAS的依从性及其相关因素。方法:于2019年3月至4月在Kasulu地区采用混合方法进行卫生机构横断面调查。对320名有0-6个月孩子的妇女进行了结构化问卷调查,以评估孕妇遵守IFAS的相关因素。数据输入SPSS 22.0进行分析。进一步采用二元逻辑回归来确定与IFAS依从性相关的因素。对19名孕妇和15名0-6个月儿童的母亲进行了焦点小组讨论,以更清楚地了解与遵守IFAS相关的因素。此外,还对六名卫生保健提供者进行了深入访谈,以探讨他们对IFAS的看法。结果:在调查的320名受访者中,20.3% (n = 65)坚持IFAS。与孕妇坚持IFAS相关的因素包括:开始ANC的时间(AOR = 3.72, 95% CI: 1.42, 9.79)、对贫血的了解(AOR = 3.84, 95% CI: 1.335, 10.66)、关于叶酸铁重要性的咨询(AOR = 3.86, 95% CI: 1.42, 10.50)、临床访问期间给予的IFAS (AOR = 15.72, 95% CI: 5.34, 46.31)、进食次数(AOR = 3.44, 95% CI: 1.28, 9.21)、子女数量(AOR = 3.462, 95% CI:1.035, 11.58)和到卫生设施的距离(AOR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.131, 0.886)。定性研究结果显示,第一次ANC就诊延迟、孕妇服用IFAS的剩余时间不足、对贫血的负面影响认识不足、对IFAS和副作用管理的认识不足、对IFAS使用的消极信念以及随访机制是依从性差的主要原因。结论:妊娠期补充叶酸铁的依从性较低。加强建立提醒机制的制度,通过对孕妇和卫生服务提供者的教育项目提高社区意识,可以提高对IFAS的遵守程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Adolescents' Sexual Reproductive Health Service Utilization and Associated Factors Among Bahir Dar City High School Students, Amhara Region, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Unmet Need for Modern Contraceptive Methods Among Displaced Married Women in Their Reproductive Years in Bishan Guracha Town, West Arsi Zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Pregnancy Outcomes Among Teenagers at a National Referral Hospital in Uganda. Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Reducing Myomectomy-Associated Blood Loss among Patients with Uterine Myomas at Federal Teaching Hospital Abakaliki: A Randomized Control Trial. The Disposal of Placenta among Indigenous Groups Globally: An Integrative Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1