Prevalence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Associated Risk Factors among Patients with Wound Infection at Referral Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia.

IF 1.1 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY Journal of Pathogens Pub Date : 2020-05-24 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/3168325
Yeterefwork Tsige, Senait Tadesse, Tsehaynesh G/Eyesus, Mulugeta Mihrete Tefera, Anteneh Amsalu, Marta Alemayhu Menberu, Baye Gelaw
{"title":"Prevalence of Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and Associated Risk Factors among Patients with Wound Infection at Referral Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia.","authors":"Yeterefwork Tsige,&nbsp;Senait Tadesse,&nbsp;Tsehaynesh G/Eyesus,&nbsp;Mulugeta Mihrete Tefera,&nbsp;Anteneh Amsalu,&nbsp;Marta Alemayhu Menberu,&nbsp;Baye Gelaw","doi":"10.1155/2020/3168325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The spectrums of infections due to methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> are manifold and are associated with worse outcomes. A study on the prevalence of these pathogens and their sensitivity patterns will give updated information which is very helpful for health personnel responsible in the management of patients and timely monitoring of the emergence of resistant bacteria. Hence, the study aimed at assessing the prevalence of methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and associated factors among patients with wound infection at Dessie Referral Hospital.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted among 266 patients at Dessie Referral Hospital from February to May 2016. Wound swab samples were collected aseptically using Levine's technique and transported to Dessie Regional Laboratory by using brain-heart infusion transport media. Isolation of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> was done based on cultural and biochemical profiles. Drug susceptibility test was performed using the disc diffusion technique as per the standard and interpreted based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. The data were entered and analyzed by using SPSS version 20.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong><i>Staphylococcus</i> isolates from 266 processed wound swabs were 92 (34.58%). Of these, 26 (28.3%) were identified as methicillin-resistant <i>S. aureus</i> and 66 (71.7%) were methicillin-sensitive <i>S. aureus</i>. The overall prevalence of methicillin-resistant <i>S. aureus</i> among the study population was 9.8%. The isolated methicillin-resistant <i>S. aureus</i> showed full resistance to penicillin (100%) followed by erythromycin and ciprofloxacin (16, 61.5%) and cotrimoxazole and gentamicin (14, 53.8%). From the total <i>S. aureus</i> isolates, 20 (21.7%) of them showed multidrug resistance. Of these methicillin-resistant <i>S. aureus</i>, 18 (69.8%) showed high multidrug resistance. Patients who are farmers in occupation (AOR = 6.1, 95% CI (1.086-33.724)), admitted in the hospital (AOR = 3.56, 95% CI (1.429-8.857)), and have low BMI (<18.5) (AOR = 13.89, 95% CI (4.919-39.192)) were among the risk factors significantly associated with wound infection due to methicillin-resistant <i>S. aureus</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All methicillin-resistant <i>S. aureus</i> isolates were 100% resistant to penicillin and showed high multidrug resistance. Therefore, antibiotic susceptibility test should be performed prior to treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16788,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathogens","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/3168325","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3168325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

Background: The spectrums of infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus are manifold and are associated with worse outcomes. A study on the prevalence of these pathogens and their sensitivity patterns will give updated information which is very helpful for health personnel responsible in the management of patients and timely monitoring of the emergence of resistant bacteria. Hence, the study aimed at assessing the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and associated factors among patients with wound infection at Dessie Referral Hospital.

Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 266 patients at Dessie Referral Hospital from February to May 2016. Wound swab samples were collected aseptically using Levine's technique and transported to Dessie Regional Laboratory by using brain-heart infusion transport media. Isolation of Staphylococcus aureus was done based on cultural and biochemical profiles. Drug susceptibility test was performed using the disc diffusion technique as per the standard and interpreted based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. The data were entered and analyzed by using SPSS version 20.

Result: Staphylococcus isolates from 266 processed wound swabs were 92 (34.58%). Of these, 26 (28.3%) were identified as methicillin-resistant S. aureus and 66 (71.7%) were methicillin-sensitive S. aureus. The overall prevalence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus among the study population was 9.8%. The isolated methicillin-resistant S. aureus showed full resistance to penicillin (100%) followed by erythromycin and ciprofloxacin (16, 61.5%) and cotrimoxazole and gentamicin (14, 53.8%). From the total S. aureus isolates, 20 (21.7%) of them showed multidrug resistance. Of these methicillin-resistant S. aureus, 18 (69.8%) showed high multidrug resistance. Patients who are farmers in occupation (AOR = 6.1, 95% CI (1.086-33.724)), admitted in the hospital (AOR = 3.56, 95% CI (1.429-8.857)), and have low BMI (<18.5) (AOR = 13.89, 95% CI (4.919-39.192)) were among the risk factors significantly associated with wound infection due to methicillin-resistant S. aureus.

Conclusion: All methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates were 100% resistant to penicillin and showed high multidrug resistance. Therefore, antibiotic susceptibility test should be performed prior to treatment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚东北部转诊医院伤口感染患者耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌患病率及相关危险因素
背景:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的感染是多种多样的,并且与较差的结果相关。对这些病原体的流行及其敏感性模式的研究将提供最新信息,这对负责管理患者和及时监测耐药细菌出现的卫生人员非常有帮助。因此,本研究旨在评估Dessie转诊医院伤口感染患者中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的患病率及其相关因素。方法:对2016年2 - 5月在Dessie转诊医院就诊的266例患者进行横断面研究。创面拭子标本采用Levine技术无菌采集,用脑-心输注转运介质转运至Dessie地区实验室。根据培养和生化特征分离金黄色葡萄球菌。药敏试验按标准采用碟扩散技术进行,并根据临床与实验室标准协会指南进行解释。使用SPSS 20进行数据录入和分析。结果:266份创面拭子中分离出葡萄球菌92株,占34.58%。其中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌26株(28.3%),甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌66株(71.7%)。研究人群中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的总体患病率为9.8%。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌对青霉素完全耐药(100%),其次是红霉素-环丙沙星(16,61.5%)和复方新诺明-庆大霉素(14,53.8%)。金黄色葡萄球菌总分离株中有20株(21.7%)出现多药耐药。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌中高耐多药18株(69.8%)。职业农民(AOR = 6.1, 95% CI(1.086 ~ 33.724))、住院(AOR = 3.56, 95% CI(1.429 ~ 8.857))、BMI较低的患者(金黄色葡萄球菌;结论:所有耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌对青霉素的耐药率均为100%,且具有较高的耐多药性。因此,治疗前应进行抗生素药敏试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pathogens
Journal of Pathogens MICROBIOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Establishment of a STING-Deficient HepG2 Cell Line through CRISPR/Cas9 System and Evaluation of Its Effects on Salmonella Replication. Fermented Polyherbal Formulation Ameliorates the Severity of Acute Multiple Antibiotics-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Infected Burn Wound in a Rat Burn Model Detection of Biofilm Production and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern among Clinically Isolated Staphylococcus aureus. Seroprevalence of Human Brucellosis among Syrian Refugees in Jordan, 2022 Determination of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Factors and Their Association with Clinical and Demographic Factors in Kenya.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1