Euthanasia in Serbia: Attitudes of Students of Law and Medicine.

IF 1.3 Q2 Social Sciences International Quarterly of Community Health Education Pub Date : 2021-04-01 Epub Date: 2020-06-22 DOI:10.1177/0272684X20936938
Darko Dimovski, Veljko Turanjanin, Milica Kolaković-Bojović, Dragana Čvorović
{"title":"Euthanasia in Serbia: Attitudes of Students of Law and Medicine.","authors":"Darko Dimovski,&nbsp;Veljko Turanjanin,&nbsp;Milica Kolaković-Bojović,&nbsp;Dragana Čvorović","doi":"10.1177/0272684X20936938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Voluntary active euthanasia represents one of the key topics in the contemporary world medicine, law, religious, ethical and moral issues. Serbia considers legalization of this procedure. Between the others, it is important to examine the student's attitudes regarding this issue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from the faculties of law and medicine, from the universities of Kragujevac and Niš, Serbia. Data were collected during the second half of 2017. The research included 214 students. Due to the nature, subject and hypothesis of the research, the authors used descriptive method and the method of the theoretical content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Generally, 54% of the students are in favor of legalization of the voluntary active euthanasia. 62, 4% would take part in the referendum on the legalization euthanasia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results obtained in the survey on euthanasia on a sample of law and medical students in Niš and Kragujevac indicate that choice of the faculty (law or medicine) influences the structure (share) of responses to particular questions to some extent. However, this influence does not provide ground for conclusion that students' opinion on legalization and application of euthanasia depends on fact they study law or medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":54184,"journal":{"name":"International Quarterly of Community Health Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0272684X20936938","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Quarterly of Community Health Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272684X20936938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Voluntary active euthanasia represents one of the key topics in the contemporary world medicine, law, religious, ethical and moral issues. Serbia considers legalization of this procedure. Between the others, it is important to examine the student's attitudes regarding this issue.

Methods: Data were obtained from the faculties of law and medicine, from the universities of Kragujevac and Niš, Serbia. Data were collected during the second half of 2017. The research included 214 students. Due to the nature, subject and hypothesis of the research, the authors used descriptive method and the method of the theoretical content analysis.

Results: Generally, 54% of the students are in favor of legalization of the voluntary active euthanasia. 62, 4% would take part in the referendum on the legalization euthanasia.

Conclusion: The results obtained in the survey on euthanasia on a sample of law and medical students in Niš and Kragujevac indicate that choice of the faculty (law or medicine) influences the structure (share) of responses to particular questions to some extent. However, this influence does not provide ground for conclusion that students' opinion on legalization and application of euthanasia depends on fact they study law or medicine.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塞尔维亚的安乐死:法律和医学专业学生的态度。
背景:自愿主动安乐死是当代世界医学、法律、宗教、伦理和道德问题的关键议题之一。塞尔维亚考虑将这一程序合法化。在其他方面,重要的是要检查学生对这个问题的态度。方法:数据来自塞尔维亚克拉古耶瓦茨大学和尼日什大学的法律系和医学院。数据收集于2017年下半年。这项研究包括214名学生。由于研究的性质、主题和假设,作者采用了描述法和理论内容分析法。结果:总体而言,54%的学生赞成自愿主动安乐死合法化。62.4%的人会参加安乐死合法化的公投。结论:对尼日什和克拉古耶瓦茨的法律和医学专业学生的安乐死调查结果表明,院系的选择(法律或医学)在一定程度上影响了特定问题的回答结构(份额)。然而,这种影响并不能让我们得出这样的结论:学生对安乐死合法化和应用的看法取决于他们学习法律或医学的事实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Quarterly of Community Health Education
International Quarterly of Community Health Education PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The International Quarterly of Community Health Education is committed to publishing applied research, policy and case studies dealing with community health education and its relationship to social change. Since 1981, this rigorously peer-referred Journal has contained a wide selection of material in readable style and format by contributors who are not only authorities in their field, but can also write with vigor, clarity, and occasionally with humor. Since its introduction the Journal has considered all manuscripts, especially encouraging stimulating articles which manage to combine maximum readability with scholarly standards.
期刊最新文献
A Resilient Care of the Patient With COVID-19: A Phenomenological Study. 'A Way to Know' Your Stress: Acceptability and Meaning of Hair Sample Collection for Cortisol Analysis From African-American and Latina Women in a Digital Storytelling Study. Study of Adolescents' Puberty, Adolescence Training Program: The Application of Intervention Mapping Approach. Organizational Transformation to Improve Breast Cancer Screening Behaviors in Iranian Women: A Qualitative Study. Knowledge as Determinant of Healthy-Eating Among Male Postgraduate Public Health Students in a Nigerian Tertiary Institution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1