Internet-based survey of the perceptions of surgical scars of Japanese patients.

Scars, burns & healing Pub Date : 2020-06-11 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2059513120928515
Masushi Kohta, Chihiro Nishigaki
{"title":"Internet-based survey of the perceptions of surgical scars of Japanese patients.","authors":"Masushi Kohta, Chihiro Nishigaki","doi":"10.1177/2059513120928515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The adverse aesthetic effects of post-surgical scars frequently impose a psychological burden on patients. We conducted an Internet-based questionnaire survey of Japanese individuals to explore patient satisfaction with respect to surgical scars and to identify the factors that affect their interest and experience of scar care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted for the previous year on patients who had undergone the following surgeries: gastrointestinal; orthopaedic; obstetric; gynaecological; and plastic. The questionnaire included: (1) measures of participant characteristics; (2) measures of interest, experience and satisfaction with scar care; (3) measures of current and desired scar condition; and (4) measures of communication with physicians or nurses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 214 participants were enrolled. Of these, only 90 individuals had experienced any treatment or self-care, and only 30 were satisfied with their experience. We found a significant gap between the current and desired thickness and colour of the scar (<i>P</i> < 0.01). On logistic regression analysis, scars located at a visible site and size of the scar were significant factors that affected the interest and experience of scar care. Only 40% of participants answered that their physician or nurse adequately understands their concerns pertaining to the scar condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Only a small proportion of individuals were satisfied with their experience of scar care. Additional research in following areas is required: (1) mutual communication between patients and medical providers; and (2) development of a new care programme for the management of scars.</p>","PeriodicalId":21495,"journal":{"name":"Scars, burns & healing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e7/b6/10.1177_2059513120928515.PMC7290269.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scars, burns & healing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2059513120928515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The adverse aesthetic effects of post-surgical scars frequently impose a psychological burden on patients. We conducted an Internet-based questionnaire survey of Japanese individuals to explore patient satisfaction with respect to surgical scars and to identify the factors that affect their interest and experience of scar care.

Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted for the previous year on patients who had undergone the following surgeries: gastrointestinal; orthopaedic; obstetric; gynaecological; and plastic. The questionnaire included: (1) measures of participant characteristics; (2) measures of interest, experience and satisfaction with scar care; (3) measures of current and desired scar condition; and (4) measures of communication with physicians or nurses.

Results: A total of 214 participants were enrolled. Of these, only 90 individuals had experienced any treatment or self-care, and only 30 were satisfied with their experience. We found a significant gap between the current and desired thickness and colour of the scar (P < 0.01). On logistic regression analysis, scars located at a visible site and size of the scar were significant factors that affected the interest and experience of scar care. Only 40% of participants answered that their physician or nurse adequately understands their concerns pertaining to the scar condition.

Conclusion: Only a small proportion of individuals were satisfied with their experience of scar care. Additional research in following areas is required: (1) mutual communication between patients and medical providers; and (2) development of a new care programme for the management of scars.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于日本患者对手术疤痕看法的网络调查。
介绍:手术后疤痕对美观造成的不良影响经常给患者带来心理负担。我们通过互联网对日本人进行了问卷调查,以了解患者对手术疤痕的满意度,并找出影响他们对疤痕护理的兴趣和体验的因素:方法:我们对去年接受过以下手术的患者进行了横断面研究:胃肠道手术、骨科手术、产科手术、妇科手术和整形手术。调查问卷包括(1) 测量参与者的特征;(2) 测量对疤痕护理的兴趣、经验和满意度;(3) 测量当前和期望的疤痕状况;(4) 测量与医生或护士的沟通情况:结果:共有 214 人参加了此次调查。结果:共有 214 人参加了调查,其中只有 90 人接受过任何治疗或自我护理,只有 30 人对自己的经历表示满意。我们发现,目前疤痕的厚度和颜色与期望值之间存在明显差距(P < 0.01)。在逻辑回归分析中,位于明显部位的疤痕和疤痕的大小是影响疤痕护理兴趣和经验的重要因素。只有 40% 的参与者回答他们的医生或护士充分了解他们对疤痕状况的担忧:结论:只有一小部分人对疤痕护理感到满意。需要在以下方面开展更多研究:(1)患者与医疗服务提供者之间的相互沟通;(2)制定新的疤痕护理方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of oral Calendula officinalis on second-degree burn wound healing. To bleed or not to bleed? Case series and discussion of haemorrhage risk with enzymatic debridement in burn injuries. An evaluation of clinical psychology input into burns multidisciplinary follow-up clinics. The efficacy of combined ultrasound and electric field stimulation therapy in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Protocol for clinical diagnosis and empiric treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients: observations and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1