Why Would the Pope Have A Private Audience with Anesthesiologists? The Origin of the “Doctrine of Double Effect” and Its Application to Pain Control

Q3 Arts and Humanities Journal of Anesthesia History Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.janh.2020.02.001
David P. Martin MD, PhD , James J. Delaney PhD , Douglas R. Bacon MD, MA
{"title":"Why Would the Pope Have A Private Audience with Anesthesiologists? The Origin of the “Doctrine of Double Effect” and Its Application to Pain Control","authors":"David P. Martin MD, PhD ,&nbsp;James J. Delaney PhD ,&nbsp;Douglas R. Bacon MD, MA","doi":"10.1016/j.janh.2020.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Sunday February 24, 1957 was a pivotal day in the history of anesthesiology<span> and pain medicine. The leader of the Roman Catholic Church, Pope Pius XII met with anesthesiologists attending an international symposium sponsored by the Italian Society of Anesthesiologists entitled, “Anesthesia and the Human Personality”. The purpose of this audience was to seek clarification about the use of opioids at the end of life to reduce suffering. Three questions had been formulated from the previous year’s Italian Congress of Anesthesiologists and sent to the </span></span>Holy See on this specific issue. The Pope responded during this audience remarking that there was no moral obligation to withhold pain medication that could elevate suffering. He further remarked that the suppression of consciousness that can occur with opioids was consistent with the spirit of the Christian gospels. Finally, he also stated that it was not morally objectionable to administer opioids even if it might shorten life. The moral philosophy behind these answers is the doctrine of double effect. In essence, administering medications to relieve pain, the primary effect, may also hasten death, the unintended secondary effect. In seeking answers to these questions, the Italian anesthesiologists were at the forefront of a larger and ongoing debate. As new therapies are developed that may have unintended consequences, when it is morally permissible to use them?</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia History","volume":"6 2","pages":"Pages 74-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.janh.2020.02.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352452920300025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sunday February 24, 1957 was a pivotal day in the history of anesthesiology and pain medicine. The leader of the Roman Catholic Church, Pope Pius XII met with anesthesiologists attending an international symposium sponsored by the Italian Society of Anesthesiologists entitled, “Anesthesia and the Human Personality”. The purpose of this audience was to seek clarification about the use of opioids at the end of life to reduce suffering. Three questions had been formulated from the previous year’s Italian Congress of Anesthesiologists and sent to the Holy See on this specific issue. The Pope responded during this audience remarking that there was no moral obligation to withhold pain medication that could elevate suffering. He further remarked that the suppression of consciousness that can occur with opioids was consistent with the spirit of the Christian gospels. Finally, he also stated that it was not morally objectionable to administer opioids even if it might shorten life. The moral philosophy behind these answers is the doctrine of double effect. In essence, administering medications to relieve pain, the primary effect, may also hasten death, the unintended secondary effect. In seeking answers to these questions, the Italian anesthesiologists were at the forefront of a larger and ongoing debate. As new therapies are developed that may have unintended consequences, when it is morally permissible to use them?

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么教皇要私下接见麻醉师?“双重效应说”的起源及其在疼痛控制中的应用
1957年2月24日星期日是麻醉学和疼痛医学史上关键的一天。罗马天主教会领袖庇护十二世教皇会见了参加由意大利麻醉师协会主办的题为“麻醉与人类人格”国际研讨会的麻醉师。这次会议的目的是寻求澄清在生命末期使用阿片类药物以减少痛苦的问题。去年意大利麻醉师大会就这一具体问题提出了三个问题,并送交教廷。教皇在听众的评论中回应说,没有道德上的义务来阻止可能增加痛苦的止痛药。他进一步指出,阿片类药物对意识的抑制与基督教福音书的精神是一致的。最后,他还表示,服用阿片类药物在道德上并不令人反感,即使它可能缩短生命。这些答案背后的道德哲学是双重效应学说。从本质上讲,使用药物来缓解疼痛,这是主要的效果,也可能加速死亡,这是意想不到的次要效果。在寻找这些问题的答案的过程中,意大利麻醉师走在了一场规模更大、持续不断的辩论的前沿。随着新疗法的发展,可能会产生意想不到的后果,什么时候使用它们在道德上是允许的?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Anesthesia History
Journal of Anesthesia History Arts and Humanities-History and Philosophy of Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anesthesia History (ISSN 2352-4529) is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to advancing the study of anesthesia history and related disciplines. The Journal addresses anesthesia history from antiquity to the present. Its wide scope includes the history of perioperative care, pain medicine, critical care medicine, physician and nurse practices of anesthesia, equipment, drugs, and prominent individuals. The Journal serves a diverse audience of physicians, nurses, dentists, clinicians, historians, educators, researchers and academicians.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Anaesthesia in Indian Detective Fiction; The curious case of Byomkesh Bakshi The Historical Struggles of Modified Electroconvulsive Therapy: How Anesthesia Came to the Rescue Horace Wells as a Classic Tragic Hero or Horace Wells. Reconciliation with a Tragic Hero
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1