Gillian Strudwick, Richard G Booth, Drew McLean, Kevin Leung, Sarah Rossetti, Miriam McCann, John Strauss
{"title":"Identifying indicators of meaningful patient portal use by psychiatric populations.","authors":"Gillian Strudwick, Richard G Booth, Drew McLean, Kevin Leung, Sarah Rossetti, Miriam McCann, John Strauss","doi":"10.1080/17538157.2020.1776291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The primary objective of this study was to identify meaningful indicators of patient portal use deemed important to psychiatric consumers. The secondary objectives were to uncover: 1) barriers and facilitators to patient portal use; and, 2) desired functionality of the technology by psychiatric consumers.</p><p><p>A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using focus groups consisting of psychiatric consumers, their family members/caregivers, and Peer Support Workers. Two members of the research team independently performed a content analysis, and came to agreement on the identified coding hierarchy and themes. A total of twenty-three participants took part in one of five focus groups. Engagement and empowerment, consumer experience and satisfaction, and quality of care were identified as outcome indicators. Privacy and security, portal usage, and usability were identified as important process indicators. A number of barriers and facilitators were identified. Finally, psychiatric consumers desired functionality of a patient portal were discussed.</p><p><p>Findings suggest that patient portal research among psychiatric populations can be conducted using many of the indicators that have previously been used for physical health populations. However, this study identified other unique considerations that should be accounted for when evaluating a patient portal among psychiatric populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54984,"journal":{"name":"Informatics for Health & Social Care","volume":"45 4","pages":"396-409"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17538157.2020.1776291","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics for Health & Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2020.1776291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Abstract
The primary objective of this study was to identify meaningful indicators of patient portal use deemed important to psychiatric consumers. The secondary objectives were to uncover: 1) barriers and facilitators to patient portal use; and, 2) desired functionality of the technology by psychiatric consumers.
A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using focus groups consisting of psychiatric consumers, their family members/caregivers, and Peer Support Workers. Two members of the research team independently performed a content analysis, and came to agreement on the identified coding hierarchy and themes. A total of twenty-three participants took part in one of five focus groups. Engagement and empowerment, consumer experience and satisfaction, and quality of care were identified as outcome indicators. Privacy and security, portal usage, and usability were identified as important process indicators. A number of barriers and facilitators were identified. Finally, psychiatric consumers desired functionality of a patient portal were discussed.
Findings suggest that patient portal research among psychiatric populations can be conducted using many of the indicators that have previously been used for physical health populations. However, this study identified other unique considerations that should be accounted for when evaluating a patient portal among psychiatric populations.
期刊介绍:
Informatics for Health & Social Care promotes evidence-based informatics as applied to the domain of health and social care. It showcases informatics research and practice within the many and diverse contexts of care; it takes personal information, both its direct and indirect use, as its central focus.
The scope of the Journal is broad, encompassing both the properties of care information and the life-cycle of associated information systems.
Consideration of the properties of care information will necessarily include the data itself, its representation, structure, and associated processes, as well as the context of its use, highlighting the related communication, computational, cognitive, social and ethical aspects.
Consideration of the life-cycle of care information systems includes full range from requirements, specifications, theoretical models and conceptual design through to sustainable implementations, and the valuation of impacts. Empirical evidence experiences related to implementation are particularly welcome.
Informatics in Health & Social Care seeks to consolidate and add to the core knowledge within the disciplines of Health and Social Care Informatics. The Journal therefore welcomes scientific papers, case studies and literature reviews. Examples of novel approaches are particularly welcome. Articles might, for example, show how care data is collected and transformed into useful and usable information, how informatics research is translated into practice, how specific results can be generalised, or perhaps provide case studies that facilitate learning from experience.