Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring by a novel cuffless device: a pilot study.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Blood Pressure Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-07-01 DOI:10.1080/08037051.2020.1785273
Filippo Scalise, Davide Margonato, Andrea Sole, Antonio Sorropago, Giovanni Sorropago, Giuseppe Mancia
{"title":"Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring by a novel cuffless device: a pilot study.","authors":"Filippo Scalise,&nbsp;Davide Margonato,&nbsp;Andrea Sole,&nbsp;Antonio Sorropago,&nbsp;Giovanni Sorropago,&nbsp;Giuseppe Mancia","doi":"10.1080/08037051.2020.1785273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cuffless blood pressure (CL-BP) measurements are believed to be a potentially alternative to cuff-occlusion-based (C-BP) measurement. A new cuffless device was developed for ambulatory BP monitoring. We assessed the accuracy of a new CL-BP device compared to a standard oscillatory C-BP device over the 24 h.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty-four consecutive patients were included in the study. BP was measured simultaneously by the CL-BP device and by a C-BP device over the 24 h. Calculations included 24 h mean systolic (S) BP, the mean diastolic (D) BP and the heart rate (HR). Correlations between the CL-BP and C-BP measurements were sought using Pearson's correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the C-BP device, the 24 h SBP value for the cohort was 125.4 ± 10.9 mmHg (mean ± SD); the corresponding DBP value being 75 ± 8.3 mmHg. Mean SBP/DBP were higher with the CL-BP device, i.e. 131.1 ± 15.9/80.2 ± 9.7 mmHg . The correlation coefficients between the two sets of values were significant (SBP: <i>r</i> = 0.58, DBP: <i>r</i> = 0.65). Better correlations for SBP and DBP were found 1) in patients with BMI > 25 (SBP: <i>r</i> = 0.65, DBP: <i>r</i> = 0.70) compared to those with BMI <25 and 2) in males compared to females (SBP: <i>r</i> = 0.71, DBP: <i>r</i> = 0.77).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our patients a CL-BP device estimated 24 h mean SBP and DBP differently from the classical oscillometric device, with a moderate correlation. CL-BP measurements were most accurate on male and overweight subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":55591,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure","volume":"29 6","pages":"375-381"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08037051.2020.1785273","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2020.1785273","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose: Cuffless blood pressure (CL-BP) measurements are believed to be a potentially alternative to cuff-occlusion-based (C-BP) measurement. A new cuffless device was developed for ambulatory BP monitoring. We assessed the accuracy of a new CL-BP device compared to a standard oscillatory C-BP device over the 24 h.

Materials and methods: Eighty-four consecutive patients were included in the study. BP was measured simultaneously by the CL-BP device and by a C-BP device over the 24 h. Calculations included 24 h mean systolic (S) BP, the mean diastolic (D) BP and the heart rate (HR). Correlations between the CL-BP and C-BP measurements were sought using Pearson's correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots.

Results: Using the C-BP device, the 24 h SBP value for the cohort was 125.4 ± 10.9 mmHg (mean ± SD); the corresponding DBP value being 75 ± 8.3 mmHg. Mean SBP/DBP were higher with the CL-BP device, i.e. 131.1 ± 15.9/80.2 ± 9.7 mmHg . The correlation coefficients between the two sets of values were significant (SBP: r = 0.58, DBP: r = 0.65). Better correlations for SBP and DBP were found 1) in patients with BMI > 25 (SBP: r = 0.65, DBP: r = 0.70) compared to those with BMI <25 and 2) in males compared to females (SBP: r = 0.71, DBP: r = 0.77).

Conclusions: In our patients a CL-BP device estimated 24 h mean SBP and DBP differently from the classical oscillometric device, with a moderate correlation. CL-BP measurements were most accurate on male and overweight subjects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新型无袖带装置的动态血压监测:一项初步研究。
目的:无袖带血压(CL-BP)测量被认为是一种潜在的替代基于袖带闭塞(C-BP)测量。研制了一种用于动态血压监测的新型无套管装置。我们在24小时内评估了新CL-BP装置与标准振荡C-BP装置的准确性。材料与方法:84例连续患者纳入研究。在24小时内,用CL-BP仪和C-BP仪同时测量血压。计算24 h平均收缩压(S)、平均舒张压(D)和心率(HR)。使用Pearson相关系数和Bland-Altman图寻求CL-BP和C-BP测量之间的相关性。结果:使用C-BP装置,该队列24 h收缩压值为125.4±10.9 mmHg (mean±SD);相应的DBP值为75±8.3 mmHg。CL-BP装置的平均收缩压/舒张压较高,为131.1±15.9/80.2±9.7 mmHg。两组值的相关系数显著(收缩压:r = 0.58, DBP: r = 0.65)。1) BMI > 25(收缩压:r = 0.65, DBP: r = 0.70)的患者与BMI = 0.71, DBP: r = 0.77的患者相比,收缩压与DBP的相关性更好。结论:在我们的患者中,CL-BP装置估计的24小时平均收缩压和舒张压与经典的振荡装置不同,具有中等相关性。男性和超重受试者的CL-BP测量最准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Blood Pressure
Blood Pressure 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
41
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For outstanding coverage of the latest advances in hypertension research, turn to Blood Pressure, a primary source for authoritative and timely information on all aspects of hypertension research and management. Features include: • Physiology and pathophysiology of blood pressure regulation • Primary and secondary hypertension • Cerebrovascular and cardiovascular complications of hypertension • Detection, treatment and follow-up of hypertension • Non pharmacological and pharmacological management • Large outcome trials in hypertension.
期刊最新文献
Diverse pharmacological properties, trial results, comorbidity prescribing and neural pathophysiology suggest European hypertension guideline downgrading of beta-blockers is not justified. Coffee and blood pressure: exciting news! Accuracy of home blood pressure measurement: the ACCURAPRESS study - a proposal of Young Investigator Group of the Italian Hypertension Society (Società Italiana dell'Ipertensione Arteriosa). Blood pressure response to close or loose contact between physician and patient during attended office blood pressure measurement. Psychological determinants of drug adherence and severity of hypertension in patients with apparently treatment-resistant vs. controlled hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1