The Effect of Forearm Tattoos on Flap Choice in Transmasculine Phalloplasty Patients.

IF 1.9 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES MDM Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2020-06-29 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2381468320938740
Travis A Benson, Elizabeth R Boskey, Oren Ganor
{"title":"The Effect of Forearm Tattoos on Flap Choice in Transmasculine Phalloplasty Patients.","authors":"Travis A Benson, Elizabeth R Boskey, Oren Ganor","doi":"10.1177/2381468320938740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose.</b> The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) is considered the gold standard for gender affirming phalloplasty. Ideally, a nondominant forearm flap is used to minimize the risk of functional morbidity. However, many transmasculine individuals have tattooed forearms, which can affect decision making. The purpose of this study was to understand the prevalence of forearm tattoos among transmasculine patients seeking phalloplasty and how and whether tattoos affected decision making about flap source. <b>Methods.</b> Participants were 50, consecutive, adult, transmasculine patients seeking phalloplasty. The presence and location of tattoos were assessed using consult notes in the electronic medical record. A one-tailed test of proportions was used to test whether forearm tattoos increased the likelihood of alternative flap choice. <b>Results.</b> More than half of patients (56%) had tattoos on either one or both forearms (<i>n</i> = 28), 75% on their nondominant arm (<i>n</i> = 21). Among the patients with forearm tattoos, the presence of tattoos affected the flap site decision for 46% of patients (<i>n</i> = 13). For the patients that chose an alternative flap site, 46% chose a dominant forearm RFFF (<i>n</i> = 6) and 54% an anterolateral thigh flap (<i>n</i> = 7). The percentage of patients whose records indicated that they were planning on using an alternative flap due to a tattoo on their nondominant forearm was significantly higher than the percentage of patients without such tattoos, indicating the desire for an alternate flap (<i>P</i> < 0.01). <b>Conclusion.</b> Many transmasculine patients seeking phalloplasty have tattoos on either one or both of their forearms. Because of this, a substantial fraction of patients may choose flap donor sites that are less ideal. Providers from all disciplines may wish to educate young transmasculine patients about how tattoo placement may affect surgical options earlier during transition.</p>","PeriodicalId":36567,"journal":{"name":"MDM Policy and Practice","volume":"5 1","pages":"2381468320938740"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b8/8a/10.1177_2381468320938740.PMC7325467.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2381468320938740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) is considered the gold standard for gender affirming phalloplasty. Ideally, a nondominant forearm flap is used to minimize the risk of functional morbidity. However, many transmasculine individuals have tattooed forearms, which can affect decision making. The purpose of this study was to understand the prevalence of forearm tattoos among transmasculine patients seeking phalloplasty and how and whether tattoos affected decision making about flap source. Methods. Participants were 50, consecutive, adult, transmasculine patients seeking phalloplasty. The presence and location of tattoos were assessed using consult notes in the electronic medical record. A one-tailed test of proportions was used to test whether forearm tattoos increased the likelihood of alternative flap choice. Results. More than half of patients (56%) had tattoos on either one or both forearms (n = 28), 75% on their nondominant arm (n = 21). Among the patients with forearm tattoos, the presence of tattoos affected the flap site decision for 46% of patients (n = 13). For the patients that chose an alternative flap site, 46% chose a dominant forearm RFFF (n = 6) and 54% an anterolateral thigh flap (n = 7). The percentage of patients whose records indicated that they were planning on using an alternative flap due to a tattoo on their nondominant forearm was significantly higher than the percentage of patients without such tattoos, indicating the desire for an alternate flap (P < 0.01). Conclusion. Many transmasculine patients seeking phalloplasty have tattoos on either one or both of their forearms. Because of this, a substantial fraction of patients may choose flap donor sites that are less ideal. Providers from all disciplines may wish to educate young transmasculine patients about how tattoo placement may affect surgical options earlier during transition.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前臂纹身对经阴道阴茎整形术患者皮瓣选择的影响
目的。桡侧前臂游离皮瓣(RFFF)被认为是阴茎整形术中确认性别的黄金标准。理想情况下,应使用非支配性前臂皮瓣,以最大限度地降低功能性发病的风险。然而,许多跨性别者的前臂都有纹身,这可能会影响决策。本研究的目的是了解寻求阴茎整形手术的跨性别患者前臂纹身的普遍程度,以及纹身如何以及是否会影响对皮瓣来源的决策。研究方法。参与者为 50 名连续寻求阴茎整形手术的跨性别成年患者。通过电子病历中的会诊记录来评估纹身的存在和位置。采用单尾比例检验来测试前臂纹身是否会增加选择其他皮瓣的可能性。结果显示超过一半的患者(56%)在一只或两只前臂上有纹身(28人),75%在非支配臂上(21人)。在前臂有纹身的患者中,46% 的患者(13 人)在决定皮瓣部位时受到纹身的影响。在选择其他皮瓣部位的患者中,46%选择了前臂RFFF(6人),54%选择了大腿前外侧皮瓣(7人)。记录显示因前臂非支配部位有纹身而计划使用替代皮瓣的患者比例明显高于无纹身的患者比例,这表明患者希望使用替代皮瓣(P < 0.01)。结论。许多寻求阴茎成形术的跨性别患者的一只或两只前臂上都有纹身。因此,相当一部分患者可能会选择不太理想的皮瓣供体部位。各学科的医疗人员不妨在年轻的跨性别患者过渡期间尽早向其宣传纹身位置可能会影响手术选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
MDM Policy and Practice
MDM Policy and Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prioritizing Patients from the Most Deprived Areas on Elective Waiting Lists in the NHS in England: Estimating the Health and Health Inequality Impact. Optimizing Masks and Random Screening Test Usage within K-12 Schools. Associations of Concordant and Shared Lung Cancer Screening Decision Making with Decisional Conflict: A Multi-Institution Cross-Sectional Analysis. Implications of Diminishing Lifespan Marginal Utility for Valuing Equity in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Evaluation of the Soda Tax on Obesity and Diabetes in California: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1