Patient-Reported Outcomes After Platelet-Rich Plasma, Bone Marrow Aspirate, and Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Injections for Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis.

IF 1.9 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Clinical Medicine Insights. Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders Pub Date : 2020-07-03 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179544120931086
Esteban Estrada, Jose L Décima, Marcelo Rodríguez, Marianela Di Tomaso, Javier Roberti
{"title":"Patient-Reported Outcomes After Platelet-Rich Plasma, Bone Marrow Aspirate, and Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Injections for Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis.","authors":"Esteban Estrada,&nbsp;Jose L Décima,&nbsp;Marcelo Rodríguez,&nbsp;Marianela Di Tomaso,&nbsp;Javier Roberti","doi":"10.1177/1179544120931086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to compare platelet-rich plasma (PRP), bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) injections in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee using functional scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 89 patients with painful knee OA were included in this study. Patients were assigned to one of the 3 treatments according to severity of OA as indicated by symptoms and radiography to PRP (stage I), BMAC (stage II), or adipose-derived MSC (stage III). Clinical assessment was performed using the Knee Society Score, which combines the Knee Score, based on the clinical parameters, and the Functional Score, and IKDC score. Surveys were completed at preoperative and at 90, 180, and 265 days postoperative. The follow-up responses were compared with baseline and between treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment with PRP, BMAC, and adipose-derived MSC included 29 (32.6%), 27 (30.3%), and 33 (37.1%) patients, respectively. For the total group, median age was 61 years (range: 22-84 years). Score values were comparable among treatment groups at baseline. Statistically significant improvement was observed in the 3 groups according to the 3 scores at all time points during follow-up compared with baseline. No difference was found among treatment type.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support previous reports and encourage further research on the use of these cost-effective treatments for OA of the knee.</p>","PeriodicalId":10443,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"13 ","pages":"1179544120931086"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179544120931086","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179544120931086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare platelet-rich plasma (PRP), bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) injections in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee using functional scores.

Methods: A total of 89 patients with painful knee OA were included in this study. Patients were assigned to one of the 3 treatments according to severity of OA as indicated by symptoms and radiography to PRP (stage I), BMAC (stage II), or adipose-derived MSC (stage III). Clinical assessment was performed using the Knee Society Score, which combines the Knee Score, based on the clinical parameters, and the Functional Score, and IKDC score. Surveys were completed at preoperative and at 90, 180, and 265 days postoperative. The follow-up responses were compared with baseline and between treatment groups.

Results: Treatment with PRP, BMAC, and adipose-derived MSC included 29 (32.6%), 27 (30.3%), and 33 (37.1%) patients, respectively. For the total group, median age was 61 years (range: 22-84 years). Score values were comparable among treatment groups at baseline. Statistically significant improvement was observed in the 3 groups according to the 3 scores at all time points during follow-up compared with baseline. No difference was found among treatment type.

Conclusions: Our findings support previous reports and encourage further research on the use of these cost-effective treatments for OA of the knee.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者报告的富血小板血浆、骨髓抽吸和脂肪来源间充质干细胞注射治疗症状性膝骨关节炎的结果
目的:本研究的目的是通过功能评分比较富血小板血浆(PRP)、骨髓抽吸浓缩液(BMAC)和脂肪源性间充质干细胞(MSC)注射治疗膝关节骨关节炎(OA)的效果。方法:89例膝关节骨性关节炎患者为研究对象。根据症状和影像学显示的OA严重程度,将患者分配到PRP (I期)、BMAC (II期)或脂肪源性MSC (III期)的3种治疗方法之一。临床评估使用膝关节社会评分,该评分结合了基于临床参数的膝关节评分、功能评分和IKDC评分。调查分别于术前、术后90天、180天和265天完成。将随访反应与基线和治疗组之间进行比较。结果:PRP、BMAC和脂肪来源的MSC治疗分别包括29例(32.6%)、27例(30.3%)和33例(37.1%)患者。整个组中位年龄为61岁(范围:22-84岁)。各治疗组在基线时的评分值具有可比性。3组患者随访各时间点的3项评分均较基线有统计学意义的改善。不同处理类型间无差异。结论:我们的研究结果支持先前的报道,并鼓励进一步研究这些具有成本效益的治疗膝关节OA的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Is CRPS-1 a Chronic Disabling Disease? A Long-term, Real-Life Study on Patients Treated With Neridronate. The Impact of Tobacco Smoking on Systemic Sclerosis, Idiopathic Inflammatory Myositis, and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Role of Interleukin-17 in Predicting Activity of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Good Short- and Mid-term Outcome After Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Infiltration for Hallux Rigidus: A Case Report. Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis, Erythema Nodosum, and Polyarthritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1