Face, content, construct validity and training effect of touch surgery™ as a surgical decision-making trainer for novices in open appendicectomy

Chi Lap Nicholas Tsang , Jerry Cao , Kapil Sugand , Jacqui Chiu , Franz Casper Pretorius
{"title":"Face, content, construct validity and training effect of touch surgery™ as a surgical decision-making trainer for novices in open appendicectomy","authors":"Chi Lap Nicholas Tsang ,&nbsp;Jerry Cao ,&nbsp;Kapil Sugand ,&nbsp;Jacqui Chiu ,&nbsp;Franz Casper Pretorius","doi":"10.1016/j.isjp.2020.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Laparoscopic surgery has become the gold standard for many operations with significant benefits in morbidity and hospital recovery time. One such procedure is appendicectomy, which is overwhelmingly performed using the laparoscopic approach in the modern era. This has also meant that the number of cases involving traditional open appendicectomy has declined despite surgeons being expected to be able to convert to the open technique if required. One method to rehearse for theatre is the use of software applications. This paper investigates the validity of Touch Surgery™ as an education tool for surgical decision-making for novices, as well as its training effect in open appendicectomy.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>70 participants will be recruited, consisting of 60 medical students (novices) and 10 surgical consultants (experts). For face, content, and construct validity, first attempt scores on the Touch Surgery™ Open Appendicectomy Test Module will be compared between novices and experts. For the training effect and knowledge decline elements of the study, novices will be further randomised into either the low intervention (control) group who will complete the simulation once, or to the high intervention group who will complete the simulation six times, with both novice groups asked to repeat the test one week later. All participants will also be requested to complete questionnaires regarding the stimulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":42077,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery Protocols","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.isjp.2020.05.002","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468357420300176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic surgery has become the gold standard for many operations with significant benefits in morbidity and hospital recovery time. One such procedure is appendicectomy, which is overwhelmingly performed using the laparoscopic approach in the modern era. This has also meant that the number of cases involving traditional open appendicectomy has declined despite surgeons being expected to be able to convert to the open technique if required. One method to rehearse for theatre is the use of software applications. This paper investigates the validity of Touch Surgery™ as an education tool for surgical decision-making for novices, as well as its training effect in open appendicectomy.

Method

70 participants will be recruited, consisting of 60 medical students (novices) and 10 surgical consultants (experts). For face, content, and construct validity, first attempt scores on the Touch Surgery™ Open Appendicectomy Test Module will be compared between novices and experts. For the training effect and knowledge decline elements of the study, novices will be further randomised into either the low intervention (control) group who will complete the simulation once, or to the high intervention group who will complete the simulation six times, with both novice groups asked to repeat the test one week later. All participants will also be requested to complete questionnaires regarding the stimulation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
touch surgery™作为开放性阑尾切除术新手手术决策培训课程的内容、内容、结构效度及培训效果
腹腔镜手术已成为许多手术的金标准,在发病率和住院恢复时间方面具有显著的优势。其中一种手术是阑尾切除术,在现代,这种手术绝大多数采用腹腔镜方法。这也意味着传统的开放式阑尾切除术的病例数量已经下降,尽管外科医生被期望能够在需要时转换为开放式技术。为戏剧排练的一种方法是使用软件应用程序。本文探讨Touch Surgery™作为新手手术决策教育工具的有效性,以及其在阑尾开腹切除术中的培训效果。方法招募70名参与者,包括60名医学生(新手)和10名外科顾问(专家)。对于面部、内容和结构效度,将比较新手和专家在Touch Surgery™开放式阑尾切除术测试模块上的第一次尝试分数。为了研究的训练效果和知识下降因素,新手将进一步随机分为低干预(对照)组,他们将完成一次模拟,或高干预组,他们将完成六次模拟,两组新手都被要求在一周后重复测试。所有参与者还将被要求完成关于刺激的问卷调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: IJS Protocols is the first peer-reviewed, international, open access journal seeking to publish research protocols across across the full breadth of the surgical field. We are aim to provide rapid submission to decision times whilst maintaining a high quality peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision in colon cancer: a prospective cohort study Research protocol for an observational health data analysis to assess the applicability of randomized controlled trials focusing on newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer using real-world data: PIONEER IMI’s “big data for better outcomes” program Prophylactic slowly resorbable mesh in midline laparotomy to limit incisional hernia incidence: the prospective ‘Mesh Augmented Reinforcement of Abdominal Wall Suture Line (MARS)’ cohort study protocol Challenges during implant-assisted prosthetic rehabilitation in fibula reconstructed jaws and its management: a scoping review protocol The association of breast surgery ASPIRE: breast pain pathway rapid evaluation project - study protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1