Response Priming with Horizontally and Vertically Moving Primes: A Comparison of German, Malaysian, and Japanese Subjects.

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Advances in Cognitive Psychology Pub Date : 2020-04-26 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.5709/acp-0291-y
Christina Bermeitinger, Laura Kalbfleisch, Katharina Schäfer, Alfred Lim, Hannah Goymann, Lea Reuter, Steve M J Janssen
{"title":"Response Priming with Horizontally and Vertically Moving Primes: A Comparison of German, Malaysian, and Japanese Subjects.","authors":"Christina Bermeitinger,&nbsp;Laura Kalbfleisch,&nbsp;Katharina Schäfer,&nbsp;Alfred Lim,&nbsp;Hannah Goymann,&nbsp;Lea Reuter,&nbsp;Steve M J Janssen","doi":"10.5709/acp-0291-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Response priming refers to the finding that a prime preceding a target influences the response to the target. With German subjects, horizontally moving dots as primes, and static arrows as targets, there are typically faster responses to compatible (i.e., prime and target are associated with the same response) as compared to incompatible targets (i.e., positive compatibility effect, PCE) with short stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs). In contrast, with longer SOAs, subjects respond faster to incompatible as compared to compatible targets (i.e., negative compatibility effect, NCE). In the present study, we extended the evidence by adding vertically oriented materials. Furthermore, we tested subjects from Malaysia and Japan, where the vertical orientation is more present in daily life, and compared them to German subjects to investigate whether the amount of experience with one orientation influences the compatibility effects on this orientation. Overall, we found pronounced PCEs in the short SOA (i.e., 150 ms) but only reduced PCEs in the longer SOAs (i.e., 350, 550, and 750 ms) across all countries and orientations. There were no differences between the German and Malaysian samples, but the Japanese sample showed larger PCEs in the longer SOAs compared to both other samples. Furthermore, we found larger PCEs for horizontal than vertical materials in the short SOA and larger PCEs for vertical than horizontal materials in the longer SOAs. We discuss our findings in light of theories and findings on compatibility effects as well as attentional mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":51754,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Cognitive Psychology","volume":"16 2","pages":"131-149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/12/3c/acp-16-2-294.PMC7341111.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0291-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Response priming refers to the finding that a prime preceding a target influences the response to the target. With German subjects, horizontally moving dots as primes, and static arrows as targets, there are typically faster responses to compatible (i.e., prime and target are associated with the same response) as compared to incompatible targets (i.e., positive compatibility effect, PCE) with short stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs). In contrast, with longer SOAs, subjects respond faster to incompatible as compared to compatible targets (i.e., negative compatibility effect, NCE). In the present study, we extended the evidence by adding vertically oriented materials. Furthermore, we tested subjects from Malaysia and Japan, where the vertical orientation is more present in daily life, and compared them to German subjects to investigate whether the amount of experience with one orientation influences the compatibility effects on this orientation. Overall, we found pronounced PCEs in the short SOA (i.e., 150 ms) but only reduced PCEs in the longer SOAs (i.e., 350, 550, and 750 ms) across all countries and orientations. There were no differences between the German and Malaysian samples, but the Japanese sample showed larger PCEs in the longer SOAs compared to both other samples. Furthermore, we found larger PCEs for horizontal than vertical materials in the short SOA and larger PCEs for vertical than horizontal materials in the longer SOAs. We discuss our findings in light of theories and findings on compatibility effects as well as attentional mechanisms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水平和垂直移动启动的反应启动:德国、马来西亚和日本受试者的比较。
反应启动指的是发现在目标之前的启动会影响对目标的反应。在德国被试中,水平移动的圆点作为启动物,静止的箭头作为目标,对兼容目标(即启动和目标具有相同的反应)的反应通常比不兼容目标(即积极兼容效应,PCE)在短刺激启动异步(SOAs)下的反应更快。相反,对于较长的soa,受试者对不兼容目标的反应要快于对兼容目标的反应(即负兼容性效应,NCE)。在本研究中,我们通过增加垂直取向的材料来扩展证据。此外,我们对来自马来西亚和日本的受试者进行了测试,这两个国家在日常生活中更多地使用垂直方向,并将他们与德国受试者进行了比较,以调查一种方向的经验量是否会影响这种方向的兼容性效应。总的来说,我们在所有国家和方向的较短SOA(即150毫秒)中发现了明显的pce,但在较长的SOA(即350、550和750毫秒)中,pce只是减少了。德国和马来西亚样本之间没有差异,但日本样本在较长的soa中显示出比其他两个样本更大的pce。此外,我们发现在较短的SOA中,水平材料的pce大于垂直材料,而在较长的SOA中,垂直材料的pce大于水平材料。我们从兼容性效应和注意机制的理论和研究结果来讨论我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Cognitive Psychology
Advances in Cognitive Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Coronavirus Anxiety as Mediator in the Relationship of Depression and Fear of Death among Polish Adults in the Second Half of Life Detrimental and Beneficial Effects in Ongoing and Lasting Collaborative Memory: Insight From the Emotional Timeout Procedure Sensory Overlap for Specific Memories Only Matters for Poor Memory Traces The Influence of Fit Between Regulatory Focus and Decision-Making Strategies on Moral Judgment The Two-Factor Structure of Cognitive Flexibility: Tempo of Switching and Overcoming of Prepotent Responses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1