Antegrade Chronic Total Occlusion Strategies: A Technical Focus for 2020.

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY Interventional Cardiology Review Pub Date : 2020-06-29 eCollection Date: 2020-04-01 DOI:10.15420/icr.2020.05
Calum Creaney, Simon J Walsh
{"title":"Antegrade Chronic Total Occlusion Strategies: A Technical Focus for 2020.","authors":"Calum Creaney,&nbsp;Simon J Walsh","doi":"10.15420/icr.2020.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic total occlusions (CTOs) are common in patients with ischaemic heart disease. In many countries, patients with CTOs are underserved by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). One of the barriers to CTO PCI is the technical challenges of these procedures. Improvements in technique and dedicated devices for CTO PCI, combined with advances in procedural strategy, have resulted in a dramatic increase in procedural success and outcomes. Antegrade wiring (AW) is the preferred initial strategy in short CTOs, where the proximal cap and course of the vessel is understood. For many longer, more complex occlusions, AW has a low probability of success. Dissection and re-entry techniques allow longer CTOs and those with ambiguous anatomy to be crossed safely and efficiently, and CTO operators must also be familiar with these strategies. The CrossBoss and Stingray system is currently the primary targeted re-entry device used during antegrade dissection and re-entry (ADR), and there continues to be an evolution in its use to increase procedural efficiency. In contrast to older ADR techniques, targeted re-entry allows preservation of important side-branches, and there is no difference in outcomes compared to intraplaque stenting.</p>","PeriodicalId":38586,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Cardiology Review","volume":"15 ","pages":"e08"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/71/9f/icr-15-e08.PMC7362334.pdf","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Cardiology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2020.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Chronic total occlusions (CTOs) are common in patients with ischaemic heart disease. In many countries, patients with CTOs are underserved by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). One of the barriers to CTO PCI is the technical challenges of these procedures. Improvements in technique and dedicated devices for CTO PCI, combined with advances in procedural strategy, have resulted in a dramatic increase in procedural success and outcomes. Antegrade wiring (AW) is the preferred initial strategy in short CTOs, where the proximal cap and course of the vessel is understood. For many longer, more complex occlusions, AW has a low probability of success. Dissection and re-entry techniques allow longer CTOs and those with ambiguous anatomy to be crossed safely and efficiently, and CTO operators must also be familiar with these strategies. The CrossBoss and Stingray system is currently the primary targeted re-entry device used during antegrade dissection and re-entry (ADR), and there continues to be an evolution in its use to increase procedural efficiency. In contrast to older ADR techniques, targeted re-entry allows preservation of important side-branches, and there is no difference in outcomes compared to intraplaque stenting.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
顺行性慢性全闭塞策略:2020年的技术焦点。
慢性全闭塞(CTOs)在缺血性心脏病患者中很常见。在许多国家,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)对CTOs患者的服务不足。CTO PCI的障碍之一是这些程序的技术挑战。CTO PCI技术和专用设备的改进,加上手术策略的进步,使得手术成功率和结果显著提高。顺行布线(AW)是短期cto首选的初始策略,在这种情况下,近端血管帽和血管的走向是清楚的。对于许多更长、更复杂的闭塞,AW的成功概率很低。解剖和再入技术允许较长的CTO和结构不明确的CTO安全有效地穿越,CTO操作员也必须熟悉这些策略。CrossBoss和Stingray系统是目前在顺行解剖和再入(ADR)过程中使用的主要目标再入设备,并且其使用仍在不断发展,以提高程序效率。与较早的ADR技术相比,靶向再入可以保留重要的侧支,与斑块内支架置入相比,结果没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Cardiology Review
Interventional Cardiology Review Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Wire Escalation And De-escalation Techniques in Antegrade and Retrograde Approaches to Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Training Culture Focus Group Position Statement: Bringing Trainees and Trainers Together. Atherectomy Techniques: Rotablation, Orbital and Laser. Outcomes and Complications of Mitral and Tricuspid Transcatheter Edge-to-edge Repair. New-generation Leadless Pacemaker Implantation: First Procedures in Central Asia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1