A comparison of online and in-person counseling outcomes using solution-focused brief therapy for college students with anxiety.

Jocelyn K Novella, Kok-Mun Ng, Jessica Samuolis
{"title":"A comparison of online and in-person counseling outcomes using solution-focused brief therapy for college students with anxiety.","authors":"Jocelyn K Novella, Kok-Mun Ng, Jessica Samuolis","doi":"10.1080/07448481.2020.1786101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>This study compared online, synchronous video counseling to in-person counseling using solution-focused brief therapy for college students with mild to moderate anxiety. <b>Participants:</b> Participants were 49 undergraduate students who were seeking counseling for mild to moderate anxiety. The study was conducted from November, 2017 to December 2018. <b>Methods:</b> In a randomized, non-inferiority design, undergraduate participants were randomly assigned to online, synchronous video counseling or in-person treatment for anxiety using solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT). Participants completed the Beck's Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and College Counseling Assessment of Psychological Symptoms (CCAPS) to assess outcomes. <b>Results:</b> The results showed significant changes in scores on the BAI and the CCAPS Generalized Anxiety and Social Anxiety subscales for participants in both study conditions, and no significant differences in effectiveness of the two delivery methods. <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings provide support for the treatment of college students with anxiety with SFBT through online, synchronous video counseling. Limitations related to sample size and diversity are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":377757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of American college health : J of ACH","volume":" ","pages":"1161-1168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of American college health : J of ACH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2020.1786101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study compared online, synchronous video counseling to in-person counseling using solution-focused brief therapy for college students with mild to moderate anxiety. Participants: Participants were 49 undergraduate students who were seeking counseling for mild to moderate anxiety. The study was conducted from November, 2017 to December 2018. Methods: In a randomized, non-inferiority design, undergraduate participants were randomly assigned to online, synchronous video counseling or in-person treatment for anxiety using solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT). Participants completed the Beck's Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and College Counseling Assessment of Psychological Symptoms (CCAPS) to assess outcomes. Results: The results showed significant changes in scores on the BAI and the CCAPS Generalized Anxiety and Social Anxiety subscales for participants in both study conditions, and no significant differences in effectiveness of the two delivery methods. Conclusions: The findings provide support for the treatment of college students with anxiety with SFBT through online, synchronous video counseling. Limitations related to sample size and diversity are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以解决方案为中心的大学生焦虑简短治疗的在线和面对面咨询结果比较。
目的比较在线同步视频咨询与面对面咨询对轻、中度焦虑大学生的解决焦点简短治疗效果。参与者:参与者为49名寻求轻度至中度焦虑咨询的本科生。该研究于2017年11月至2018年12月进行。方法:在随机、非效性设计中,本科生参与者被随机分配到在线、同步视频咨询或面对面的焦虑治疗中,使用以解决为重点的简短治疗(SFBT)。参与者完成贝克焦虑量表(BAI)和大学心理症状咨询评估量表(CCAPS)来评估结果。结果:结果显示,在两种研究条件下,参与者在BAI和CCAPS广义焦虑和社交焦虑分量表上的得分均有显著变化,两种递送方式的有效性无显著差异。结论:本研究结果可为SFBT在线同步视频咨询治疗大学生焦虑提供支持。讨论了与样本量和多样性有关的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of using the snackability app on snack quality among US college students with overweight and obesity: A randomized controlled trial. Neither a problem nor my problem: Risk factors for underage drinking disengagement among college students. Smoking behaviors among Middle Eastern college women in the United States. Antibiotic use: A cross-sectional survey assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and practices amongst students of Punjab, Pakistan. Factors associated with anxiety and depression among U.S. doctoral students: Evidence from the gradSERU survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1