A comparison of online and in-person counseling outcomes using solution-focused brief therapy for college students with anxiety.

IF 16.4 1区化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2020-07-23 DOI:10.1080/07448481.2020.1786101

Jocelyn K Novella, Kok-Mun Ng, Jessica Samuolis

{"title":"A comparison of online and in-person counseling outcomes using solution-focused brief therapy for college students with anxiety.","authors":"Jocelyn K Novella, Kok-Mun Ng, Jessica Samuolis","doi":"10.1080/07448481.2020.1786101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveThis study compared online, synchronous video counseling to in-person counseling using solution-focused brief therapy for college students with mild to moderate anxiety. Participants: Participants were 49 undergraduate students who were seeking counseling for mild to moderate anxiety. The study was conducted from November, 2017 to December 2018. Methods: In a randomized, non-inferiority design, undergraduate participants were randomly assigned to online, synchronous video counseling or in-person treatment for anxiety using solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT). Participants completed the Beck's Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and College Counseling Assessment of Psychological Symptoms (CCAPS) to assess outcomes. Results: The results showed significant changes in scores on the BAI and the CCAPS Generalized Anxiety and Social Anxiety subscales for participants in both study conditions, and no significant differences in effectiveness of the two delivery methods. Conclusions: The findings provide support for the treatment of college students with anxiety with SFBT through online, synchronous video counseling. Limitations related to sample size and diversity are discussed.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":" ","pages":"1161-1168"},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07448481.2020.1786101","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2020.1786101","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 34

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study compared online, synchronous video counseling to in-person counseling using solution-focused brief therapy for college students with mild to moderate anxiety. Participants: Participants were 49 undergraduate students who were seeking counseling for mild to moderate anxiety. The study was conducted from November, 2017 to December 2018. Methods: In a randomized, non-inferiority design, undergraduate participants were randomly assigned to online, synchronous video counseling or in-person treatment for anxiety using solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT). Participants completed the Beck's Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and College Counseling Assessment of Psychological Symptoms (CCAPS) to assess outcomes. Results: The results showed significant changes in scores on the BAI and the CCAPS Generalized Anxiety and Social Anxiety subscales for participants in both study conditions, and no significant differences in effectiveness of the two delivery methods. Conclusions: The findings provide support for the treatment of college students with anxiety with SFBT through online, synchronous video counseling. Limitations related to sample size and diversity are discussed.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

以解决方案为中心的大学生焦虑简短治疗的在线和面对面咨询结果比较。

目的比较在线同步视频咨询与面对面咨询对轻、中度焦虑大学生的解决焦点简短治疗效果。参与者:参与者为49名寻求轻度至中度焦虑咨询的本科生。该研究于2017年11月至2018年12月进行。方法:在随机、非效性设计中，本科生参与者被随机分配到在线、同步视频咨询或面对面的焦虑治疗中，使用以解决为重点的简短治疗(SFBT)。参与者完成贝克焦虑量表(BAI)和大学心理症状咨询评估量表(CCAPS)来评估结果。结果:结果显示，在两种研究条件下，参与者在BAI和CCAPS广义焦虑和社交焦虑分量表上的得分均有显著变化，两种递送方式的有效性无显著差异。结论:本研究结果可为SFBT在线同步视频咨询治疗大学生焦虑提供支持。讨论了与样本量和多样性有关的限制。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合

CiteScore

31.40

自引率

1.10%

发文量

312

审稿时长

2 months

期刊介绍： Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.