[Outbreak study of workers with irritative symptomswoking in the microbiology and clinical analysis laboratories of a tertiary public hospital].

José María Ramada, Ana Beltran Fonollosa, Consol Serra, Fernando G Benavides
{"title":"[Outbreak study of workers with irritative symptomswoking in the microbiology and clinical analysis laboratories of a tertiary public hospital].","authors":"José María Ramada,&nbsp;Ana Beltran Fonollosa,&nbsp;Consol Serra,&nbsp;Fernando G Benavides","doi":"10.12961/aprl.2020.23.03.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In April 2018, an unusually high number of eye, throat and nose irritative symptoms, nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms and dizziness were identified in workers in the microbiology (LAM) and clinical analysis (LCA) laboratories of a tertiary public hospital in Mallorca; these symptoms were also associated with perception of unusual odors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To confirm the presence of an outbreak, identify its causes, and contribute to itsprevention and control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Epidemiological study of the outbreak involving qualitative and quantitative methods. The qualitative component was based on conducting focus groups The quantitative study allowed us to develop epidemic curves, based on employee visits to the hospital'soccupational health service (OHS) due to either symptoms or episodes of sickness absence (SA). Lastly, available industrial hygiene reports were reviewed to examine possible relationships with the distribution of cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two operational case definitions were established through the focus groups, along with identification of possible explanations for the outbreak based on employee perception.The quantitative study confirmed the outbreak in the LAM, but not in the LCA. The SA episodes in the LAM between weeks 16 and 39 exceeded the number of expected cases fourfold. We also detected an excess of visits to the OHS during the same time period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The quantitative study confirmed an epidemic outbreak that has since ended, although the qualitative study indicated the persistence of bad smell and discomfort. The improvement of epidemiological surveillance systems as a result of the study will facilitate the monitoring and control of future possible outbreaks.</p>","PeriodicalId":38326,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales","volume":"23 3","pages":"330-342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2020.23.03.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In April 2018, an unusually high number of eye, throat and nose irritative symptoms, nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms and dizziness were identified in workers in the microbiology (LAM) and clinical analysis (LCA) laboratories of a tertiary public hospital in Mallorca; these symptoms were also associated with perception of unusual odors.

Objective: To confirm the presence of an outbreak, identify its causes, and contribute to itsprevention and control.

Methods: Epidemiological study of the outbreak involving qualitative and quantitative methods. The qualitative component was based on conducting focus groups The quantitative study allowed us to develop epidemic curves, based on employee visits to the hospital'soccupational health service (OHS) due to either symptoms or episodes of sickness absence (SA). Lastly, available industrial hygiene reports were reviewed to examine possible relationships with the distribution of cases.

Results: Two operational case definitions were established through the focus groups, along with identification of possible explanations for the outbreak based on employee perception.The quantitative study confirmed the outbreak in the LAM, but not in the LCA. The SA episodes in the LAM between weeks 16 and 39 exceeded the number of expected cases fourfold. We also detected an excess of visits to the OHS during the same time period.

Conclusions: The quantitative study confirmed an epidemic outbreak that has since ended, although the qualitative study indicated the persistence of bad smell and discomfort. The improvement of epidemiological surveillance systems as a result of the study will facilitate the monitoring and control of future possible outbreaks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[某三级公立医院微生物学及临床分析实验室工作人员有刺激性症状的暴发研究]。
背景:2018年4月,马略卡岛某三级公立医院微生物学(LAM)和临床分析(LCA)实验室的工作人员发现了异常多的眼、喉、鼻刺激症状、非特异性胃肠道症状和头晕;这些症状还与对不寻常气味的感知有关。目的:确认疫情的存在,确定其原因,并为其预防和控制做出贡献。方法:采用定性和定量相结合的流行病学研究方法。定量研究使我们能够根据员工因症状或病缺勤(SA)而到医院职业健康服务(OHS)就诊的情况,绘制出流行曲线。最后,对现有的工业卫生报告进行了审查,以检查与病例分布的可能关系。结果:通过焦点小组建立了两个可操作案例定义,并根据员工的看法确定了爆发的可能解释。定量研究证实了LAM中的爆发,但LCA中没有。在第16周至第39周期间,LAM中的SA发作超过预期病例数的四倍。我们还发现,在同一时期,对职业健康和健康服务部的访问次数过多。结论:定量研究证实了一场流行病的爆发已经结束,尽管定性研究表明臭味和不适持续存在。这项研究改善了流行病学监测系统,将有助于监测和控制未来可能发生的疫情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa de posible origen laboral atendida en el Servicio Navarro de Salud. Navarra, España, 2017-2022 Enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa de posible origen laboral atendida en el Servicio Navarro de Salud. Navarra, España, 2017-2022 Producción científica en Scopus sobre salud financiera: periodo 2011-2022 Exposición a sílice de mineros en altitud. Dosis inhalada, método de evaluación en condición de hipobaria El sello de calidad FECYT, un reconocimiento y un estímulo para Archivos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1