Budget Impact Analysis of a Home-Based Nutrition Program for Adults at Risk for Malnutrition.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES American Health and Drug Benefits Pub Date : 2020-06-01
Suela Sulo, David Lanctin, Josh Feldstein, Bjoern Schwander, Jamie Partridge, Wendy Landow, York F Zöllner
{"title":"Budget Impact Analysis of a Home-Based Nutrition Program for Adults at Risk for Malnutrition.","authors":"Suela Sulo,&nbsp;David Lanctin,&nbsp;Josh Feldstein,&nbsp;Bjoern Schwander,&nbsp;Jamie Partridge,&nbsp;Wendy Landow,&nbsp;York F Zöllner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital-based, nutrition-focused interventions have significantly lowered the cost-associated burden of poor nutrition through a reduction in healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). However, for patients at risk for poor nutrition who receive nutritional care at home, limited evidence exists on the economic impact of nutrition-focused interventions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the 30-day cost-savings associated with an at-home nutrition-focused quality improvement program in the postacute care setting for patients at risk for poor nutrition from the perspective of a hospital system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared the HCRU of 1546 patients enrolled in a quality improvement program during 1 year versus 7413 patients in a pre-program historical cohort who received care during the 1 year before the quality improvement program implementation. The analysis included the number of 30-day hospitalizations, emergency department and outpatient visits for both cohorts, and the associated costs. The main analysis included the fixed and variable costs for the program, and the costs of oral nutritional supplement and delivery. The costs for hospitalization, emergency department, and outpatient visit costs were based on the 2013 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project and Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the 2013 survey, the baseline costs for hospitalization, emergency department, and outpatient visit costs were $18,296, $1312, and $535, respectively. Our health economic analysis about the 30-day overall HCRU has shown that the quality improvement program group resulted in a total cost-savings of $2,408,668 for the 1546 patients in the program and a net savings of $1558 per patient compared with the costs for the pre-quality improvement program historical cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a nutrition-focused quality improvement program led to significant 30-day cost-savings, by reducing HCRU for adults who received nutritional-based care at home. The improvements in HCRU highlight the importance of implementing nutrition-focused quality improvement programs for hospital systems that provide care for patients who are at risk for poor nutrition across a variety of care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48595,"journal":{"name":"American Health and Drug Benefits","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7370826/pdf/ahdb-13-095.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Health and Drug Benefits","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospital-based, nutrition-focused interventions have significantly lowered the cost-associated burden of poor nutrition through a reduction in healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). However, for patients at risk for poor nutrition who receive nutritional care at home, limited evidence exists on the economic impact of nutrition-focused interventions.

Objective: To estimate the 30-day cost-savings associated with an at-home nutrition-focused quality improvement program in the postacute care setting for patients at risk for poor nutrition from the perspective of a hospital system.

Methods: We compared the HCRU of 1546 patients enrolled in a quality improvement program during 1 year versus 7413 patients in a pre-program historical cohort who received care during the 1 year before the quality improvement program implementation. The analysis included the number of 30-day hospitalizations, emergency department and outpatient visits for both cohorts, and the associated costs. The main analysis included the fixed and variable costs for the program, and the costs of oral nutritional supplement and delivery. The costs for hospitalization, emergency department, and outpatient visit costs were based on the 2013 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project and Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

Results: Based on the 2013 survey, the baseline costs for hospitalization, emergency department, and outpatient visit costs were $18,296, $1312, and $535, respectively. Our health economic analysis about the 30-day overall HCRU has shown that the quality improvement program group resulted in a total cost-savings of $2,408,668 for the 1546 patients in the program and a net savings of $1558 per patient compared with the costs for the pre-quality improvement program historical cohort.

Conclusion: The use of a nutrition-focused quality improvement program led to significant 30-day cost-savings, by reducing HCRU for adults who received nutritional-based care at home. The improvements in HCRU highlight the importance of implementing nutrition-focused quality improvement programs for hospital systems that provide care for patients who are at risk for poor nutrition across a variety of care settings.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有营养不良风险的成人家庭营养计划的预算影响分析。
背景:以医院为基础、以营养为重点的干预措施通过降低医疗资源利用率(HCRU),显著降低了与营养不良相关的费用负担。然而,对于在家中接受营养护理的有营养不良风险的患者,关于以营养为重点的干预措施的经济影响的证据有限。目的:从医院系统的角度估计在急性后护理环境中,对有营养不良风险的患者进行以家庭营养为重点的质量改进计划所节省的30天成本。方法:我们比较了1546名参加质量改进项目1年的患者的HCRU与7413名在质量改进项目实施前1年接受治疗的项目前历史队列患者的HCRU。分析包括两组患者住院30天的次数、急诊科和门诊就诊次数以及相关费用。主要分析包括该计划的固定成本和可变成本,以及口服营养补充剂和输送的成本。住院费用、急诊科费用和门诊费用基于2013年医疗保健成本和利用项目和医疗支出小组调查。结果:根据2013年的调查,住院、急诊科和门诊的基线费用分别为18,296美元、1312美元和535美元。我们对30天总体HCRU的健康经济分析表明,质量改进项目组为项目中的1546名患者节省了2408,668美元的总成本,与质量改进项目前的历史队列相比,每位患者的净成本节省了1558美元。结论:采用以营养为重点的质量改进方案,通过降低在家接受营养基础护理的成人的HCRU,可显著节省30天的成本。HCRU的改善突出了在各种护理环境中为有营养不良风险的患者提供护理的医院系统实施以营养为重点的质量改进计划的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Health and Drug Benefits
American Health and Drug Benefits Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: AHDB welcomes articles on clinical-, policy-, and business-related topics relevant to the integration of the forces in healthcare that affect the cost and quality of healthcare delivery, improve healthcare quality, and ultimately result in access to care, focusing on health organization structures and processes, health information, health policies, health and behavioral economics, as well as health technologies, products, and patient behaviors relevant to value-based quality of care.
期刊最新文献
Migration of Hospital Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Procedures to an Ambulatory Surgery Center Setting and Postsurgical Opioid Use: A Private Practice Experience. Characterizing Cardiac Catheterization Utilization in a US Population with Commercial or Medicare Advantage Health Plans. Effects of the Medicare Part D Comprehensive Medication Review on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Medication Adherence. Medication Optimization: Integration of Comprehensive Medication Management into Practice. Thinking About 2030.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1