A National Assessment of Diagnostic Test Use for Patients with Advanced NSCLC and Factors Influencing Physician Decision-Making.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES American Health and Drug Benefits Pub Date : 2020-06-01
Madison M Wempe, Mark D Stewart, Daniel Glass, Laura Lasiter, Diana Merino Vega, Nisha Ramamurthy, Jeff Allen, Ellen V Sigal
{"title":"A National Assessment of Diagnostic Test Use for Patients with Advanced NSCLC and Factors Influencing Physician Decision-Making.","authors":"Madison M Wempe, Mark D Stewart, Daniel Glass, Laura Lasiter, Diana Merino Vega, Nisha Ramamurthy, Jeff Allen, Ellen V Sigal","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnostic tests, including US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved tests and laboratory-developed tests, are frequently used to guide care for patients with cancer, and, recently, have been the subject of several policy discussions and insurance coverage determinations. As the use of diagnostic testing has evolved, stakeholders have raised questions about the lack of standardized test performance metrics and the risk this poses to patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the use of diagnostic testing for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), to analyze the utilization of FDA-approved versus laboratory-developed diagnostic tests, and to evaluate the impact of existing regulatory and coverage frameworks on diagnostic test ordering and physician treatment decision-making for patients with advanced NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a 2-part study consisting of an online survey and patient chart review from March 1, 2019, to March 25, 2019, of physicians managing patients with advanced NSCLC. Respondents qualified for this study if they managed at least 5 patients with advanced NSCLC per month and had diagnosed at least 1 patient with advanced NSCLC in the 12 months before the survey. A total of 150 physicians completed the survey; before completing the survey, they were instructed to review between 4 and 8 charts of patients with stage IV NSCLC from their list of active patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 150 practicing oncologists who manage patients with advanced NSCLC responded to the survey and reviewed a total of 815 patient charts. Of these 815 patients, 812 (99.6%) were tested for at least 1 biomarker, including 73% of patients who were tested for <i>EGFR</i>, 70% tested for <i>ALK</i>, 58% tested for <i>BRAF</i> V600E, and 38% of patients tested for <i>ROS1</i>, by FDA-approved diagnostic tests. In all, 185 (83%) patients who tested positive for <i>EGFR</i> and 60 (83%) patients who tested positive for <i>ALK</i> received an FDA-approved targeted therapy for their biomarker. A total of 98 (65%) physicians responded that the patient's insurance coverage factored into their decision to order diagnostic tests and 69 (45%) physicians responded that cost or the patient's insurance coverage could influence them not to prescribe an indicated targeted therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The survey results indicate that diagnostic testing has become routine in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC, the use of FDA-approved diagnostic tests has increased, and insurance coverage and cost influence patient access to diagnostic testing as well as to targeted treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":48595,"journal":{"name":"American Health and Drug Benefits","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7370822/pdf/ahdb-13-110.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Health and Drug Benefits","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diagnostic tests, including US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved tests and laboratory-developed tests, are frequently used to guide care for patients with cancer, and, recently, have been the subject of several policy discussions and insurance coverage determinations. As the use of diagnostic testing has evolved, stakeholders have raised questions about the lack of standardized test performance metrics and the risk this poses to patients.

Objectives: To describe the use of diagnostic testing for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), to analyze the utilization of FDA-approved versus laboratory-developed diagnostic tests, and to evaluate the impact of existing regulatory and coverage frameworks on diagnostic test ordering and physician treatment decision-making for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Methods: We conducted a 2-part study consisting of an online survey and patient chart review from March 1, 2019, to March 25, 2019, of physicians managing patients with advanced NSCLC. Respondents qualified for this study if they managed at least 5 patients with advanced NSCLC per month and had diagnosed at least 1 patient with advanced NSCLC in the 12 months before the survey. A total of 150 physicians completed the survey; before completing the survey, they were instructed to review between 4 and 8 charts of patients with stage IV NSCLC from their list of active patients.

Results: A total of 150 practicing oncologists who manage patients with advanced NSCLC responded to the survey and reviewed a total of 815 patient charts. Of these 815 patients, 812 (99.6%) were tested for at least 1 biomarker, including 73% of patients who were tested for EGFR, 70% tested for ALK, 58% tested for BRAF V600E, and 38% of patients tested for ROS1, by FDA-approved diagnostic tests. In all, 185 (83%) patients who tested positive for EGFR and 60 (83%) patients who tested positive for ALK received an FDA-approved targeted therapy for their biomarker. A total of 98 (65%) physicians responded that the patient's insurance coverage factored into their decision to order diagnostic tests and 69 (45%) physicians responded that cost or the patient's insurance coverage could influence them not to prescribe an indicated targeted therapy.

Conclusion: The survey results indicate that diagnostic testing has become routine in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC, the use of FDA-approved diagnostic tests has increased, and insurance coverage and cost influence patient access to diagnostic testing as well as to targeted treatment options.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项关于晚期 NSCLC 患者诊断测试使用情况和影响医生决策因素的全国性评估。
背景:诊断检测,包括美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的检测和实验室开发的检测,经常被用于指导癌症患者的治疗,最近也成为了一些政策讨论和保险范围确定的主题。随着诊断检测的使用不断发展,利益相关者对缺乏标准化的检测性能指标以及由此给患者带来的风险提出了质疑:描述晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者诊断检测的使用情况,分析美国食品药物管理局(FDA)批准的诊断检测与实验室开发的诊断检测的使用情况,评估现有监管和保险框架对晚期 NSCLC 患者诊断检测订购和医生治疗决策的影响:我们从 2019 年 3 月 1 日至 2019 年 3 月 25 日对管理晚期 NSCLC 患者的医生进行了一项由在线调查和患者病历审查两部分组成的研究。如果受访者每月至少管理 5 名晚期 NSCLC 患者,并且在调查前 12 个月内至少诊断出 1 名晚期 NSCLC 患者,则有资格参与本研究。共有 150 名医生完成了调查;在完成调查之前,他们被要求查看其在诊患者名单中 IV 期 NSCLC 患者的 4 至 8 张病历:共有 150 名管理晚期 NSCLC 患者的执业肿瘤学家参与了调查,他们共查看了 815 份患者病历。在这 815 名患者中,有 812 人(99.6%)接受了至少一种生物标记物检测,其中 73% 的患者接受了表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)检测,70% 的患者接受了 ALK 检测,58% 的患者接受了 BRAF V600E 检测,38% 的患者接受了 ROS1 检测。总共有 185 名(83%)表皮生长因子受体检测呈阳性的患者和 60 名(83%)ALK 检测呈阳性的患者接受了 FDA 批准的针对其生物标记物的靶向治疗。共有 98 名(65%)医生回答说,患者的保险范围是他们决定是否进行诊断检测的因素之一,69 名(45%)医生回答说,费用或患者的保险范围可能会影响他们不开具指定的靶向治疗处方:调查结果表明,诊断检测已成为晚期 NSCLC 患者的常规治疗方法,FDA 批准的诊断检测的使用率有所提高,而保险范围和费用会影响患者接受诊断检测和靶向治疗的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Health and Drug Benefits
American Health and Drug Benefits Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: AHDB welcomes articles on clinical-, policy-, and business-related topics relevant to the integration of the forces in healthcare that affect the cost and quality of healthcare delivery, improve healthcare quality, and ultimately result in access to care, focusing on health organization structures and processes, health information, health policies, health and behavioral economics, as well as health technologies, products, and patient behaviors relevant to value-based quality of care.
期刊最新文献
Migration of Hospital Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Procedures to an Ambulatory Surgery Center Setting and Postsurgical Opioid Use: A Private Practice Experience. Characterizing Cardiac Catheterization Utilization in a US Population with Commercial or Medicare Advantage Health Plans. Effects of the Medicare Part D Comprehensive Medication Review on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Medication Adherence. Medication Optimization: Integration of Comprehensive Medication Management into Practice. Thinking About 2030.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1