Family network typologies of adults with intellectual disability: Associations with psychological outcomes.

Tess Tournier, Alexander H C Hendriks, Andrew Jahoda, Richard P Hastings, Sanne A H Giesbers, Ad A Vermulst, Petri J C M Embregts
{"title":"Family network typologies of adults with intellectual disability: Associations with psychological outcomes.","authors":"Tess Tournier, Alexander H C Hendriks, Andrew Jahoda, Richard P Hastings, Sanne A H Giesbers, Ad A Vermulst, Petri J C M Embregts","doi":"10.1111/jar.12786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Based on self-reported social capital, different typologies of family networks of people with intellectual disabilities were examined. Associations between behavioural and emotional problems or well-being and typologies were investigated.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>137 participants with mild intellectual disability were interviewed using the Family Network Method-Intellectual Disability to assess their emotionally supportive family relationships. Data on participants' well-being and behavioural and emotional problems were also gathered. Latent class analysis was used to identify family typologies based on social network measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four distinguishable typologies were identified, two supportive and two less supportive. A small association was found with behavioural and emotional problems and one of the supportive typologies. Associations with constructs of well-being were found for both supportive and less supportive typologies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A variety of family types were found, with implications for sensitive professional support.</p>","PeriodicalId":73610,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID","volume":"34 1","pages":"65-76"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818276/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Based on self-reported social capital, different typologies of family networks of people with intellectual disabilities were examined. Associations between behavioural and emotional problems or well-being and typologies were investigated.

Method: 137 participants with mild intellectual disability were interviewed using the Family Network Method-Intellectual Disability to assess their emotionally supportive family relationships. Data on participants' well-being and behavioural and emotional problems were also gathered. Latent class analysis was used to identify family typologies based on social network measures.

Results: Four distinguishable typologies were identified, two supportive and two less supportive. A small association was found with behavioural and emotional problems and one of the supportive typologies. Associations with constructs of well-being were found for both supportive and less supportive typologies.

Conclusions: A variety of family types were found, with implications for sensitive professional support.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智障成人的家庭网络类型:与心理结果的关联。
背景:根据自我报告的社会资本,研究了智障人士家庭网络的不同类型。研究还调查了行为和情感问题或福祉与类型之间的关联:方法:使用智力障碍家庭网络法对 137 名轻度智力障碍参与者进行了访谈,以评估他们的情感支持性家庭关系。此外,还收集了有关参与者的幸福感、行为和情绪问题的数据。研究人员采用潜类分析法,根据社会网络测量结果确定家庭类型:结果:确定了四种不同类型的家庭,其中两种支持性家庭和两种支持性较弱的家庭。发现行为和情绪问题与其中一种支持性类型有微小关联。支持型和不太支持型都与幸福感的构建相关:发现了多种家庭类型,对敏感的专业支持具有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experiences and Support Needs of Siblings of Individuals With Prader-Willi Syndrome: An Integrative Systematic Review. Quality Considerations When Planning and Conducting a Virtual World Café Using an Inclusive Research Approach. Caregivers' Perspectives on the Health Status of Children With Cerebral Palsy. What Motivates Parents of Young Children With Down Syndrome to Participate in Research: A Focus Group Analysis. Parents' Emotional Journey Throughout Their Participation in a Well-Being Support Group Intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1