Understanding the extent of contraceptive non-use among women at risk of unintended pregnancy, National Survey of Family Growth 2011–2017

Q2 Medicine Contraception: X Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.conx.2020.100033
Brittni N. Frederiksen , Katherine Ahrens
{"title":"Understanding the extent of contraceptive non-use among women at risk of unintended pregnancy, National Survey of Family Growth 2011–2017","authors":"Brittni N. Frederiksen ,&nbsp;Katherine Ahrens","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe characteristics of U.S. contraceptive non-users to inform tailored contraceptive access initiatives.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We used National Survey of Family Growth data from 2011 to 2017 to identify characteristics of contraceptive non-users compared to other women ages 15–44 at risk for unintended pregnancy. We also examined reasons for not using contraception by when non-users expected their next birth. We calculated unadjusted and adjusted prevalence ratios using two definitions of contraceptive non-use: (1) contraceptive non-use during the interview month, and (2) a more refined definition based on contraception use during the most recent month of sexual intercourse and expectation of timing of next birth. We considered p-values &lt;<!--> <!-->0.05 statistically significant.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Approximately 20% (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2844) of 12,071 women at risk of unintended pregnancy were classified as standard contraceptive non-users. After adjusting for all other variables, non-users were more likely to be low-income, uninsured, never married, expect a birth within 2 years, and have zero or one parity. The top reasons for contraceptive non-use were not minding if they got pregnant (22.6%), worried about contraceptive side effects (21.0%), and not thinking they could get pregnant (17.6%). After applying the more refined non-user definition, we identified 5.7% (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->721) of women as non-users; expecting a birth within 2–5 years and having a parity of one were associated with non-use after adjustment of all other factors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our more refined definition of non-users could be used in future studies examining the causes of unintended pregnancy and to inform programmatic interventions to reduce unintended pregnancy.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Describing contraceptive non-users and reasons for contraceptive non-use could help us better understand reasons for unintended pregnancy and inform tailored contraceptive access initiatives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100033"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100033","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Objective

To describe characteristics of U.S. contraceptive non-users to inform tailored contraceptive access initiatives.

Study design

We used National Survey of Family Growth data from 2011 to 2017 to identify characteristics of contraceptive non-users compared to other women ages 15–44 at risk for unintended pregnancy. We also examined reasons for not using contraception by when non-users expected their next birth. We calculated unadjusted and adjusted prevalence ratios using two definitions of contraceptive non-use: (1) contraceptive non-use during the interview month, and (2) a more refined definition based on contraception use during the most recent month of sexual intercourse and expectation of timing of next birth. We considered p-values < 0.05 statistically significant.

Results

Approximately 20% (n = 2844) of 12,071 women at risk of unintended pregnancy were classified as standard contraceptive non-users. After adjusting for all other variables, non-users were more likely to be low-income, uninsured, never married, expect a birth within 2 years, and have zero or one parity. The top reasons for contraceptive non-use were not minding if they got pregnant (22.6%), worried about contraceptive side effects (21.0%), and not thinking they could get pregnant (17.6%). After applying the more refined non-user definition, we identified 5.7% (n = 721) of women as non-users; expecting a birth within 2–5 years and having a parity of one were associated with non-use after adjustment of all other factors.

Conclusion

Our more refined definition of non-users could be used in future studies examining the causes of unintended pregnancy and to inform programmatic interventions to reduce unintended pregnancy.

Implications

Describing contraceptive non-users and reasons for contraceptive non-use could help us better understand reasons for unintended pregnancy and inform tailored contraceptive access initiatives.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解有意外怀孕风险的妇女不使用避孕药具的程度,2011-2017年全国家庭增长调查
目的描述美国非避孕药使用者的特征,为量身定制的避孕措施提供信息。研究设计我们使用了2011年至2017年的全国家庭增长调查数据,以确定与其他15-44岁有意外怀孕风险的女性相比,未使用避孕药的女性的特征。我们还调查了不使用避孕措施的原因,直到不使用避孕措施的人预计下次分娩的时间。我们使用两种未使用避孕措施的定义来计算未调整和调整后的患病率:(1)访谈月份未使用避孕措施;(2)基于最近一个月性交期间的避孕措施使用情况和下一次分娩预期时间的更精确定义。我们考虑p值<0.05有统计学意义。结果12071例有意外怀孕危险的妇女中,约20% (n = 2844)被归类为标准避孕非使用者。在对所有其他变量进行调整后,不使用药物的人更有可能是低收入、无保险、未婚、预计在2 年内出生、零胎或一次胎次。不使用避孕措施的主要原因是不介意怀孕(22.6%)、担心避孕副作用(21.0%)和不认为自己能怀孕(17.6%)。在应用更精细的非用户定义后,我们确定5.7% (n = 721)的女性为非用户;在调整所有其他因素后,预期在2-5 年内出生和胎次为1与不使用相关。结论我们对非使用者的更精确定义可用于未来研究意外怀孕的原因,并为减少意外怀孕的程序性干预提供信息。描述不使用避孕措施和不使用避孕措施的原因可以帮助我们更好地了解意外怀孕的原因,并为量身定制的避孕措施提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception: X
Contraception: X Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Outpatient medical management of later second trimester abortion (18–23.6 weeks) with procedural evacuation backup: A large case series Experiences of delay-causing obstacles and mental health at the time of abortion seeking Maximizing the effectiveness of 1.5 mg levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: The case for precoital use How does person-centered maternity care relate to postpartum contraceptive counseling and use? Evidence from a longitudinal study of women delivering at health facilities in Ethiopia Dilation and evacuation versus medication abortion at 15–24 weeks of gestation in low-middle income country: A retrospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1