Mid-Cenozoic climate change, extinction, and faunal turnover in Madagascar, and their bearing on the evolution of lemurs.

IF 3.4 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences BMC Evolutionary Biology Pub Date : 2020-08-08 DOI:10.1186/s12862-020-01628-1
Laurie R Godfrey, Karen E Samonds, Justin W Baldwin, Michael R Sutherland, Jason M Kamilar, Kristen L Allfisher
{"title":"Mid-Cenozoic climate change, extinction, and faunal turnover in Madagascar, and their bearing on the evolution of lemurs.","authors":"Laurie R Godfrey,&nbsp;Karen E Samonds,&nbsp;Justin W Baldwin,&nbsp;Michael R Sutherland,&nbsp;Jason M Kamilar,&nbsp;Kristen L Allfisher","doi":"10.1186/s12862-020-01628-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Was there a mid-Cenozoic vertebrate extinction and recovery event in Madagascar and, if so, what are its implications for the evolution of lemurs? The near lack of an early and mid-Cenozoic fossil record on Madagascar has inhibited direct testing of any such hypotheses. We compare the terrestrial vertebrate fauna of Madagascar in the Holocene to that of early Cenozoic continental Africa to shed light on the probability of a major mid-Cenozoic lemur extinction event, followed by an \"adaptive radiation\" or recovery. We also use multiple analytic approaches to test competing models of lemur diversification and the null hypothesis that no unusual mid-Cenozoic extinction of lemurs occurred.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparisons of the terrestrial vertebrate faunas of the early Cenozoic on continental Africa and Holocene on Madagascar support the inference that Madagascar suffered a major mid-Cenozoic extinction event. Evolutionary modeling offers some corroboration, although the level of support varies by phylogeny and model used. Using the lemur phylogeny and divergence dates generated by Kistler and colleagues, RPANDA and TESS offer moderate support for the occurrence of unusual extinction at or near the Eocene-Oligocene (E-O) boundary (34 Ma). TreePar, operating under the condition of obligate mass extinction, found peak diversification at 31 Ma, and low probability of survival of prior lineages. Extinction at the E-O boundary received greater support than other candidate extinctions or the null hypothesis of no major extinction. Using the lemur phylogeny and divergence dates generated by Herrera & Dàvalos, evidence for large-scale extinction diminishes and its most likely timing shifts to before 40 Ma, which fails to conform to global expectations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While support for large-scale mid-Cenozoic lemur extinction on Madagascar based on phylogenetic modeling is inconclusive, the African fossil record does provide indirect support. Furthermore, a major extinction and recovery of lemuriforms during the Eocene-Oligocene transition (EOT) would coincide with other major vertebrate extinctions in North America, Europe, and Africa. It would suggest that Madagascar's lemurs were impacted by the climate shift from \"greenhouse\" to \"ice-house\" conditions that occurred at that time. This could, in turn, help to explain some of the peculiar characteristics of the lemuriform clade.</p>","PeriodicalId":9111,"journal":{"name":"BMC Evolutionary Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12862-020-01628-1","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Evolutionary Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-020-01628-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Background: Was there a mid-Cenozoic vertebrate extinction and recovery event in Madagascar and, if so, what are its implications for the evolution of lemurs? The near lack of an early and mid-Cenozoic fossil record on Madagascar has inhibited direct testing of any such hypotheses. We compare the terrestrial vertebrate fauna of Madagascar in the Holocene to that of early Cenozoic continental Africa to shed light on the probability of a major mid-Cenozoic lemur extinction event, followed by an "adaptive radiation" or recovery. We also use multiple analytic approaches to test competing models of lemur diversification and the null hypothesis that no unusual mid-Cenozoic extinction of lemurs occurred.

Results: Comparisons of the terrestrial vertebrate faunas of the early Cenozoic on continental Africa and Holocene on Madagascar support the inference that Madagascar suffered a major mid-Cenozoic extinction event. Evolutionary modeling offers some corroboration, although the level of support varies by phylogeny and model used. Using the lemur phylogeny and divergence dates generated by Kistler and colleagues, RPANDA and TESS offer moderate support for the occurrence of unusual extinction at or near the Eocene-Oligocene (E-O) boundary (34 Ma). TreePar, operating under the condition of obligate mass extinction, found peak diversification at 31 Ma, and low probability of survival of prior lineages. Extinction at the E-O boundary received greater support than other candidate extinctions or the null hypothesis of no major extinction. Using the lemur phylogeny and divergence dates generated by Herrera & Dàvalos, evidence for large-scale extinction diminishes and its most likely timing shifts to before 40 Ma, which fails to conform to global expectations.

Conclusions: While support for large-scale mid-Cenozoic lemur extinction on Madagascar based on phylogenetic modeling is inconclusive, the African fossil record does provide indirect support. Furthermore, a major extinction and recovery of lemuriforms during the Eocene-Oligocene transition (EOT) would coincide with other major vertebrate extinctions in North America, Europe, and Africa. It would suggest that Madagascar's lemurs were impacted by the climate shift from "greenhouse" to "ice-house" conditions that occurred at that time. This could, in turn, help to explain some of the peculiar characteristics of the lemuriform clade.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马达加斯加中新生代气候变化、灭绝和动物更替及其对狐猴进化的影响。
背景:马达加斯加是否存在中新生代脊椎动物灭绝和恢复事件,如果是这样,它对狐猴的进化有什么影响?马达加斯加几乎缺乏早新生代和中新生代的化石记录,这阻碍了对任何此类假设的直接测试。我们将全新世马达加斯加的陆生脊椎动物动物群与早新生代非洲大陆的陆生脊椎动物动物群进行比较,以揭示中新生代狐猴灭绝事件的可能性,随后是“适应性辐射”或恢复。我们还使用多种分析方法来测试狐猴多样化的竞争模型和零假设,即狐猴没有发生异常的中新生代灭绝。结果:非洲大陆早新生代陆生脊椎动物与马达加斯加全新世陆生脊椎动物的对比支持马达加斯加经历了一次重大的中新生代灭绝事件的推断。进化模型提供了一些佐证,尽管支持水平因系统发育和使用的模型而异。RPANDA和TESS利用Kistler及其同事生成的狐猴系统发育和分化日期,为始新世-渐新世(E-O)边界(34 Ma)或附近发生异常灭绝提供了中等程度的支持。TreePar在强制性大灭绝的条件下,发现多样性在31 Ma达到顶峰,而先前谱系的生存概率很低。在E-O边界的灭绝得到了比其他候选灭绝或无大灭绝的零假设更大的支持。利用Herrera和Dàvalos生成的狐猴系统发育和分化日期,大规模灭绝的证据减少,其最可能的时间转移到40 Ma之前,这与全球预期不符。结论:虽然基于系统发育模型的马达加斯加中新生代大规模狐猴灭绝的支持是不确定的,但非洲化石记录确实提供了间接支持。此外,在始新世-渐新世过渡时期(EOT),狐形动物的灭绝和恢复可能与北美、欧洲和非洲其他主要脊椎动物的灭绝同时发生。这表明马达加斯加的狐猴受到了当时发生的从“温室”到“冰窖”气候变化的影响。反过来,这可能有助于解释狐状分支的一些特殊特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Evolutionary Biology
BMC Evolutionary Biology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Evolutionary Biology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of molecular and non-molecular evolution of all organisms, as well as phylogenetics and palaeontology.
期刊最新文献
Correlation between bioluminescent blinks and swimming behavior in the splitfin flashlight fish Anomalops katoptron Home range of three turtle species in Central Yucatan. A comparative study Variation and plasticity in life-history traits and fitness of wild Arabidopsis thaliana populations are not related to their genotypic and ecological diversity Does local soil factor drive functional leaf trait variation? A test on Neilingding Island, South China Biodiversity and distribution patterns of blooming jellyfish in the Bohai Sea revealed by eDNA metabarcoding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1