Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Infants Delivered via Cesarean from Mothers with Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Propensity Score Analysis.

IF 3.2 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Pregnancy Pub Date : 2020-07-31 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/5658327
Mariko Nakahara, Shunji Goto, Eiji Kato, Atsuo Itakura, Satoru Takeda
{"title":"Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Infants Delivered via Cesarean from Mothers with Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Propensity Score Analysis.","authors":"Mariko Nakahara,&nbsp;Shunji Goto,&nbsp;Eiji Kato,&nbsp;Atsuo Itakura,&nbsp;Satoru Takeda","doi":"10.1155/2020/5658327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to clarify the effects of cesarean delivery on neonatal respiratory morbidity when women had preterm premature rupture of membranes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included women with preterm premature rupture of membranes who delivered from 23 weeks to 33 weeks of gestation between January 2009 and December 2014. Neonatal outcomes were compared between infants delivered by cesarean section and those delivered vaginally. The primary outcome was respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Neonatal intubation and mechanical ventilation periods were secondary outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to compare outcomes between cesarean and vaginal delivery cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 101 cesarean deliveries and 89 vaginal deliveries. A comparison of the presence or absence of neonatal complications based on the delivery type indicated a higher occurrence of RDS with cesarean deliveries (<i>P</i> = 0.025). The intubation and mechanical ventilation periods were not significantly longer in neonates delivered via cesarean section.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cesarean delivery is a risk factor for neonatal RDS in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Trials identifying long-term neonatal prognoses are needed to further develop optimal management strategies in such cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":47062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pregnancy","volume":"2020 ","pages":"5658327"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/5658327","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pregnancy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5658327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to clarify the effects of cesarean delivery on neonatal respiratory morbidity when women had preterm premature rupture of membranes.

Methods: This retrospective study included women with preterm premature rupture of membranes who delivered from 23 weeks to 33 weeks of gestation between January 2009 and December 2014. Neonatal outcomes were compared between infants delivered by cesarean section and those delivered vaginally. The primary outcome was respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Neonatal intubation and mechanical ventilation periods were secondary outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to compare outcomes between cesarean and vaginal delivery cases.

Results: There were 101 cesarean deliveries and 89 vaginal deliveries. A comparison of the presence or absence of neonatal complications based on the delivery type indicated a higher occurrence of RDS with cesarean deliveries (P = 0.025). The intubation and mechanical ventilation periods were not significantly longer in neonates delivered via cesarean section.

Conclusions: Cesarean delivery is a risk factor for neonatal RDS in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Trials identifying long-term neonatal prognoses are needed to further develop optimal management strategies in such cases.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早产胎膜早破母亲剖宫产婴儿的呼吸窘迫综合征:倾向评分分析。
目的:本研究旨在阐明剖宫产对早产儿胎膜早破新生儿呼吸系统疾病的影响。方法:本回顾性研究纳入2009年1月至2014年12月妊娠23 ~ 33周分娩的早产胎膜早破妇女。比较剖宫产和顺产两种分娩方式的新生儿结局。主要终点为呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)。新生儿插管和机械通气期是次要结局。倾向评分匹配用于比较剖宫产和阴道分娩病例的结果。结果:剖宫产101例,阴道分娩89例。基于分娩类型的新生儿并发症的存在或不存在的比较表明剖宫产的RDS发生率更高(P = 0.025)。剖宫产新生儿插管和机械通气时间无明显延长。结论:剖宫产是早产胎膜早破妇女新生儿RDS的危险因素。需要通过试验确定新生儿的长期预后,以进一步制定此类病例的最佳管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pregnancy
Journal of Pregnancy OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pregnancy is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on breastfeeding, labor, maternal health and the biomedical aspects of pregnancy.
期刊最新文献
Low-Dose Prophylactic Oral Iron Supplementation (Ferrous Fumarate, Ferrous Bisglycinate, and Ferrous Sulphate) in Pregnancy Is Not Associated With Clinically Significant Gastrointestinal Complaints: Results From Two Randomized Studies. Magnitude and Associated Factors of Herbal Medicine Use During Pregnancy Among Women Attending Antenatal Care in Public Health Institutions of Central Tigray, Northern Ethiopia (2020): Facility-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Prevalence and Factors Associated With Abnormal Cerebroplacental Ratio Among Women With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy at a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Southwestern Uganda. Development, Validation, and Diagnostic Accuracy of the Fetal Lack of Responsiveness Scale for Diagnosis of Severe Perinatal Hypoxia. Navigating Pregnancy: Information Sources and Lifestyle Behavior Choices-A Narrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1