Are there sex differences in brain activity during long-term memory? A systematic review and fMRI activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Cognitive Neuroscience Pub Date : 2021-07-01 Epub Date: 2020-08-19 DOI:10.1080/17588928.2020.1806810
Dylan S Spets, Scott D Slotnick
{"title":"Are there sex differences in brain activity during long-term memory? A systematic review and fMRI activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.","authors":"Dylan S Spets,&nbsp;Scott D Slotnick","doi":"10.1080/17588928.2020.1806810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The degree to which sex differences exist in the brain is a current topic of debate. In the present discussion paper, we reviewed eight functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) papers to determine whether there are sex differences in brain activity during long-term memory retrieval. The objectives were: 1) to compare the experimental parameters in studies reporting significant versus null long-term memory sex differences, and 2) to identify whether specific brain regions were associated with sex differences during long-term memory. The following experimental parameters were extracted from each paper: the number of participants, the average age of participants, stimulus type(s), whether or not performance was matched, whether or not sex differences were reported, the type of between-subject statistical test used, and the contrast(s) employed. The particular experimental parameters employed in each study did not appear to determine whether sex differences were observed, as there were sex differences in all eight studies. An activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis was conducted to identify brain regions activated to a greater degree by females than males or males than females. This ALE meta-analysis revealed sex differences (male > female) in the lateral prefrontal cortex, visual processing regions, parahippocampal cortex, and the cerebellum. This constitutes compelling evidence that there are substantial sex differences in brain activity during long-term memory retrieval. More broadly, the present findings question the widespread practice of collapsing across sex in the field of cognitive neuroscience.</p>","PeriodicalId":10413,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":"12 3-4","pages":"163-173"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17588928.2020.1806810","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2020.1806810","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

The degree to which sex differences exist in the brain is a current topic of debate. In the present discussion paper, we reviewed eight functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) papers to determine whether there are sex differences in brain activity during long-term memory retrieval. The objectives were: 1) to compare the experimental parameters in studies reporting significant versus null long-term memory sex differences, and 2) to identify whether specific brain regions were associated with sex differences during long-term memory. The following experimental parameters were extracted from each paper: the number of participants, the average age of participants, stimulus type(s), whether or not performance was matched, whether or not sex differences were reported, the type of between-subject statistical test used, and the contrast(s) employed. The particular experimental parameters employed in each study did not appear to determine whether sex differences were observed, as there were sex differences in all eight studies. An activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis was conducted to identify brain regions activated to a greater degree by females than males or males than females. This ALE meta-analysis revealed sex differences (male > female) in the lateral prefrontal cortex, visual processing regions, parahippocampal cortex, and the cerebellum. This constitutes compelling evidence that there are substantial sex differences in brain activity during long-term memory retrieval. More broadly, the present findings question the widespread practice of collapsing across sex in the field of cognitive neuroscience.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在长期记忆过程中,大脑活动是否存在性别差异?系统回顾和功能磁共振成像激活可能性估计荟萃分析。
大脑中存在多大程度的性别差异是当前争论的话题。在本文中,我们回顾了八篇功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)的论文,以确定在长期记忆提取过程中大脑活动是否存在性别差异。本研究的目的是:1)比较长期记忆性别差异显著与无性别差异研究中的实验参数;2)确定长期记忆中的特定大脑区域是否与性别差异有关。从每篇论文中提取以下实验参数:被试人数、被试平均年龄、刺激类型、表现是否匹配、是否报告性别差异、使用的被试间统计检验类型和采用的对比。每项研究中使用的特定实验参数似乎并不能决定是否观察到性别差异,因为所有8项研究都存在性别差异。通过激活似然估计(ALE)荟萃分析,确定女性比男性或男性比女性激活程度更高的大脑区域。这项ALE荟萃分析揭示了性别差异(男性>女性)在外侧前额叶皮层、视觉处理区、海马旁皮层和小脑。这构成了令人信服的证据,证明在长期记忆提取过程中,大脑活动存在实质性的性别差异。更广泛地说,目前的研究结果对认知神经科学领域普遍存在的跨性别崩溃现象提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Neuroscience
Cognitive Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neuroscience publishes high quality discussion papers and empirical papers on any topic in the field of cognitive neuroscience including perception, attention, memory, language, action, social cognition, and executive function. The journal covers findings based on a variety of techniques such as fMRI, ERPs, MEG, TMS, and focal lesion studies. Contributions that employ or discuss multiple techniques to shed light on the spatial-temporal brain mechanisms underlying a cognitive process are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Visuo-spatial working memory abilities modulate mental rotation: Evidence from event-related potentials. Theoretical strategies for an embodied cognitive neuroscience: Mechanistic explanations of brain-body-environment systems. Beyond embodiment: Rethinking the integration of cognitive neuroscience and mechanistic explanations. Embodied (4EA) cognitive computational neuroscience. How to build a better 4E cognition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1