Examining speech motor planning difficulties in apraxia of speech and aphasia via the sequential production of phonetically similar words.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Cognitive Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2021-02-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-29 DOI:10.1080/02643294.2020.1847059
Marja-Liisa Mailend, Edwin Maas, Pélagie M Beeson, Brad H Story, Kenneth I Forster
{"title":"Examining speech motor planning difficulties in apraxia of speech and aphasia via the sequential production of phonetically similar words.","authors":"Marja-Liisa Mailend, Edwin Maas, Pélagie M Beeson, Brad H Story, Kenneth I Forster","doi":"10.1080/02643294.2020.1847059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the underlying nature of apraxia of speech (AOS) by testing two competing hypotheses. The <i>Reduced Buffer Capacity Hypothesis</i> argues that people with AOS can plan speech only one syllable at a time Rogers and Storkel [1999. Planning speech one syllable at a time: The reduced buffer capacity hypothesis in apraxia of speech. <i>Aphasiology</i>, <i>13</i>(9-11), 793-805. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870399401885]. The <i>Program Retrieval Deficit Hypothesis</i> states that selecting a motor programme is difficult in face of competition from other simultaneously activated programmes Mailend and Maas [2013. Speech motor programming in apraxia of speech: Evidence from a delayed picture-word interference task. <i>American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology</i>, <i>22</i>(2), S380-S396. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0101)]. Speakers with AOS and aphasia, aphasia without AOS, and unimpaired controls were asked to prepare and hold a two-word utterance until a go-signal prompted a spoken response. Phonetic similarity between target words was manipulated. Speakers with AOS had longer reaction times in conditions with two similar words compared to two identical words. The Control and the Aphasia group did not show this effect. These results suggest that speakers with AOS need additional processing time to retrieve target words when multiple motor programmes are simultaneously activated.</p>","PeriodicalId":50670,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuropsychology","volume":"38 1","pages":"72-87"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7895325/pdf/nihms-1648226.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2020.1847059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the underlying nature of apraxia of speech (AOS) by testing two competing hypotheses. The Reduced Buffer Capacity Hypothesis argues that people with AOS can plan speech only one syllable at a time Rogers and Storkel [1999. Planning speech one syllable at a time: The reduced buffer capacity hypothesis in apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 13(9-11), 793-805. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870399401885]. The Program Retrieval Deficit Hypothesis states that selecting a motor programme is difficult in face of competition from other simultaneously activated programmes Mailend and Maas [2013. Speech motor programming in apraxia of speech: Evidence from a delayed picture-word interference task. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22(2), S380-S396. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0101)]. Speakers with AOS and aphasia, aphasia without AOS, and unimpaired controls were asked to prepare and hold a two-word utterance until a go-signal prompted a spoken response. Phonetic similarity between target words was manipulated. Speakers with AOS had longer reaction times in conditions with two similar words compared to two identical words. The Control and the Aphasia group did not show this effect. These results suggest that speakers with AOS need additional processing time to retrieve target words when multiple motor programmes are simultaneously activated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过顺序制作语音相似的单词,研究语言障碍和失语症患者的言语运动规划困难。
本研究通过测试两个相互竞争的假设来研究言语障碍 (AOS) 的基本性质。缓冲能力降低假说认为,AOS 患者每次只能规划一个音节的语音 罗杰斯和斯托克尔 [1999.一次规划一个音节的语音:语言障碍的缓冲能力降低假说。失语症学》,13(9-11),793-805。https://doi.org/10.1080/026870399401885]。程序检索缺陷假说(Program Retrieval Deficit Hypothesis)认为,面对同时激活的其他程序的竞争,选择一个运动程序是很困难的。语言障碍中的言语运动程序:来自延迟图片-单词干扰任务的证据。美国言语病理学杂志》,22(2),S380-S396。https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0101)]。研究人员要求患有 AOS 和失语症的说话者、不患有 AOS 的失语症说话者以及未受损的对照组说话者准备并保持两个词的语句,直到发出开始信号提示说话者做出反应。目标词之间的语音相似性受到了控制。与两个完全相同的词相比,患有失认症的说话者在两个相似词的条件下反应时间更长。而对照组和失语症组则没有出现这种效应。这些结果表明,当多个运动程序同时被激活时,患有失认症的说话者需要额外的处理时间来检索目标词。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Neuropsychology
Cognitive Neuropsychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neuropsychology is of interest to cognitive scientists and neuroscientists, neuropsychologists, neurologists, psycholinguists, speech pathologists, physiotherapists, and psychiatrists.
期刊最新文献
The localization of coma. Does the procedural deficit hypothesis of dyslexia account for the lack of automatization and the comorbidity among developmental disorders? Developmental surface dyslexia and dysgraphia in a child with corpus callosum agenesis: an approach to diagnosis and treatment. The heterogeneity of holistic processing profiles in developmental prosopagnosia: holistic processing is impaired but not absent. The relationship between semantics, phonology, and naming performance in aphasia: a structural equation modeling approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1