Evaluation of EpiProtect® microbial cellulose burns dressings in young children.

Scars, burns & healing Pub Date : 2020-08-11 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2059513120940503
Lindsay A Shanks, Andrea Cronshaw, K Skaria Alexander, Jonathan A Davies, Ciaran P O'Boyle
{"title":"Evaluation of EpiProtect® microbial cellulose burns dressings in young children.","authors":"Lindsay A Shanks, Andrea Cronshaw, K Skaria Alexander, Jonathan A Davies, Ciaran P O'Boyle","doi":"10.1177/2059513120940503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>EpiProtect® is a biosynthetic cellulose dressing indicated for the treatment of superficial burns and the dressing of deep burns. Prior to this study the youngest reported patient treated with EpiProtect® was aged 13 years.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were collected prospectively for patients aged < 5 years, presenting to the Children's Burns Unit with ⩾ 2% total body surface area (TBSA) burns sustained by any mechanism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty children were treated (median age = 17 months, age range = 1-61 months). Thirty-six burn depths were documented: superficial partial thickness (SPT) in 53% (n=19); mid-partial thickness (MPT) in 33% (n=12); deep partial thickness (DPT) in 11% (n=4); and full thickness (FT) in 3% (n=1). Median burn size was 4.5% TBSA (range = 2%-12%). EpiProtect® was applied under general anaesthesia in all cases. The median length of stay (LOS) was two days (range = 0-6 days). EpiProtect® was tolerated well and provided effective analgesia for subsequent dressing changes. Median healing time was 13 days (SPT burns), 14 days (MPT) and 24 days (DPT burns). Three patients required split skin grafting. Hypertrophic scarring arose in one patient.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This case series represents the youngest published patient group to have been treated with EpiProtect®. Authors conclude that EpiProtect® provides a safe, reliable and well-tolerated dressing option for all burn depths in young children. Importantly, EpiProtect® is culturally neutral and may be used in situations which, for cultural reasons, may preclude the use of animal-derived products. Further studies are warranted to evaluate pain scores, burn depth, size and LOS correlation, and comparative analysis between dressing types.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong>Burn injuries in the paediatric population are common and often require multiple dressing changes. Dressing changes can be painful and distressing to both children and their care givers. This article describes the experience of using a synthetically derived burns dressing, called EpiProtect®, in children aged ⩽ 5 years. Thirty patients were recruited with varying depths of scald burns and all underwent application of EpiProtect® dressing. The results suggested that EpiProtect® was a user-friendly dressing that can be used to treat partial-thickness burns and to dress full-thickness (FT) burns. It was well-tolerated and provided effective analgesia at the time of dressing changes. There was no incidence of increased burn wound infection rates and all wounds healed. In addition, as EpiProtect® is a synthetic product, it has the benefit of being culturally neutral, which is advantageous in a culturally diverse population. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of this dressing and to compare it to similar dressings that are available.</p>","PeriodicalId":21495,"journal":{"name":"Scars, burns & healing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/85/85/10.1177_2059513120940503.PMC7425250.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scars, burns & healing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2059513120940503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: EpiProtect® is a biosynthetic cellulose dressing indicated for the treatment of superficial burns and the dressing of deep burns. Prior to this study the youngest reported patient treated with EpiProtect® was aged 13 years.

Method: Data were collected prospectively for patients aged < 5 years, presenting to the Children's Burns Unit with ⩾ 2% total body surface area (TBSA) burns sustained by any mechanism.

Results: Thirty children were treated (median age = 17 months, age range = 1-61 months). Thirty-six burn depths were documented: superficial partial thickness (SPT) in 53% (n=19); mid-partial thickness (MPT) in 33% (n=12); deep partial thickness (DPT) in 11% (n=4); and full thickness (FT) in 3% (n=1). Median burn size was 4.5% TBSA (range = 2%-12%). EpiProtect® was applied under general anaesthesia in all cases. The median length of stay (LOS) was two days (range = 0-6 days). EpiProtect® was tolerated well and provided effective analgesia for subsequent dressing changes. Median healing time was 13 days (SPT burns), 14 days (MPT) and 24 days (DPT burns). Three patients required split skin grafting. Hypertrophic scarring arose in one patient.

Discussion: This case series represents the youngest published patient group to have been treated with EpiProtect®. Authors conclude that EpiProtect® provides a safe, reliable and well-tolerated dressing option for all burn depths in young children. Importantly, EpiProtect® is culturally neutral and may be used in situations which, for cultural reasons, may preclude the use of animal-derived products. Further studies are warranted to evaluate pain scores, burn depth, size and LOS correlation, and comparative analysis between dressing types.

Lay summary: Burn injuries in the paediatric population are common and often require multiple dressing changes. Dressing changes can be painful and distressing to both children and their care givers. This article describes the experience of using a synthetically derived burns dressing, called EpiProtect®, in children aged ⩽ 5 years. Thirty patients were recruited with varying depths of scald burns and all underwent application of EpiProtect® dressing. The results suggested that EpiProtect® was a user-friendly dressing that can be used to treat partial-thickness burns and to dress full-thickness (FT) burns. It was well-tolerated and provided effective analgesia at the time of dressing changes. There was no incidence of increased burn wound infection rates and all wounds healed. In addition, as EpiProtect® is a synthetic product, it has the benefit of being culturally neutral, which is advantageous in a culturally diverse population. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of this dressing and to compare it to similar dressings that are available.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对幼儿使用 EpiProtect® 微生物纤维素烧伤敷料的评估。
简介EpiProtect® 是一种生物合成纤维素敷料,用于治疗浅度烧伤和包扎深度烧伤。在本研究之前,使用 EpiProtect® 治疗的最小患者年龄为 13 岁:方法:前瞻性地收集了年龄小于 5 岁、因任何原因导致体表总面积 (TBSA) ⩾ 2% 烧伤而到儿童烧伤科就诊的患者的数据:30名儿童接受了治疗(中位年龄=17个月,年龄范围=1-61个月)。记录的烧伤深度有 36 种:表浅部分厚度烧伤(SPT)占 53%(人数=19);中厚部分烧伤(MPT)占 33%(人数=12);深厚部分烧伤(DPT)占 11%(人数=4);全厚烧伤(FT)占 3%(人数=1)。烧伤面积中位数为总面积的 4.5%(范围 = 2%-12%)。所有病例均在全身麻醉下使用 EpiProtect®。中位住院时间(LOS)为两天(范围 = 0-6 天)。患者对 EpiProtect® 的耐受性良好,并为随后的换药提供了有效的镇痛效果。中位愈合时间为 13 天(SPT 烧伤)、14 天(MPT 烧伤)和 24 天(DPT 烧伤)。三名患者需要分块植皮。一名患者出现了肥厚性瘢痕:本系列病例是已发表的使用 EpiProtect® 治疗的最年轻的患者群体。作者总结说,EpiProtect® 是一种安全可靠、耐受性良好的敷料,适用于所有烧伤深度的幼儿。重要的是,EpiProtect® 在文化上是中性的,可用于因文化原因而不能使用动物源性产品的情况。有必要开展进一步的研究,以评估疼痛评分、烧伤深度、面积和 LOS 的相关性,并对不同类型的敷料进行比较分析。换药可能会给儿童及其护理人员带来痛苦和困扰。本文介绍了在⩽ 5 岁儿童中使用合成烧伤敷料 EpiProtect® 的经验。我们招募了 30 名深度不同的烫伤患者,所有患者都使用了 EpiProtect® 敷料。结果表明,EpiProtect® 是一种用户友好型敷料,可用于治疗部分烧伤和全厚烧伤。该敷料的耐受性良好,换药时可提供有效的镇痛效果。烧伤伤口感染率没有增加,而且所有伤口都能愈合。此外,由于 EpiProtect® 是一种人工合成产品,它具有文化中立性的优点,这对文化多元的人群非常有利。我们有必要开展进一步的研究,以评估这种敷料的有效性,并将其与现有的类似敷料进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of oral Calendula officinalis on second-degree burn wound healing. To bleed or not to bleed? Case series and discussion of haemorrhage risk with enzymatic debridement in burn injuries. An evaluation of clinical psychology input into burns multidisciplinary follow-up clinics. The efficacy of combined ultrasound and electric field stimulation therapy in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Protocol for clinical diagnosis and empiric treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients: observations and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1