Negative Expression of DSG1 and DSG2, as Prognostic Biomarkers, Impacts on the Overall Survival in Patients with Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 CELL BIOLOGY Analytical Cellular Pathology Pub Date : 2020-08-10 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/9831646
Shu Xu, Shengfu Huang, Daiqiang Li, Qiong Zou, Yuan Yuan, Zhulin Yang
{"title":"Negative Expression of DSG1 and DSG2, as Prognostic Biomarkers, Impacts on the Overall Survival in Patients with Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.","authors":"Shu Xu,&nbsp;Shengfu Huang,&nbsp;Daiqiang Li,&nbsp;Qiong Zou,&nbsp;Yuan Yuan,&nbsp;Zhulin Yang","doi":"10.1155/2020/9831646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the expression of DSG1 and DSG2 and investigate their clinicopathological significance in EHCC.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The protein expression of DSG1 and DSG2 was measured by EnVision immunohistochemistry in 15 normal biliary tract tissues, 10 biliary tract adenoma tissues, 30 peritumoral tissues, and 100 EHCC tumour tissues.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The expression of the DSG1 and DSG2 proteins was significantly lower in EHCC tumour tissues than in normal biliary tract tissues, biliary tract adenoma, and peritumoral tissues (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Adenoma and peritumoral tissues with negative DSG1 and/or DSG2 protein expression exhibited atypical hyperplasia. DSG1 expression was positively correlated with DSG2 expression in EHCC (<i>P</i> < 0.01). In patients with good differentiation, no invasion, no lymph metastasis, TNM I + II stage, and radical surgery, the positive expression of DSG1 and DSG2 proteins was higher (<i>P</i> < 0.05). In comparison to patients with negative DSG1 and/or DSG2 expression, the average overall survival time of those with positive expression was significantly longer (<i>P</i> = 0.000). Cox multivariate analysis revealed that negative DSG1 and DSG2 expressions were independent of poor prognosis factors in EHCC patients. The AUC calculated for DSG1 was 0.681 (95% confidence interval: 0.594-0.768) and that for DSG2 was 0.645 (95% confidence interval: 0.555-0.734), while that for DSG1 and DSG2 was 0.772 (95% confidence interval: 0.609-0.936).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Negative protein expression of DSG1 and DSG2 is closely related to the pathogenesis, severe clinicopathological characteristics, aggressive biological behaviours, and dismal prognosis in EHCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":49326,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Cellular Pathology","volume":"2020 ","pages":"9831646"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/9831646","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Cellular Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9831646","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the expression of DSG1 and DSG2 and investigate their clinicopathological significance in EHCC.

Method: The protein expression of DSG1 and DSG2 was measured by EnVision immunohistochemistry in 15 normal biliary tract tissues, 10 biliary tract adenoma tissues, 30 peritumoral tissues, and 100 EHCC tumour tissues.

Result: The expression of the DSG1 and DSG2 proteins was significantly lower in EHCC tumour tissues than in normal biliary tract tissues, biliary tract adenoma, and peritumoral tissues (P < 0.05). Adenoma and peritumoral tissues with negative DSG1 and/or DSG2 protein expression exhibited atypical hyperplasia. DSG1 expression was positively correlated with DSG2 expression in EHCC (P < 0.01). In patients with good differentiation, no invasion, no lymph metastasis, TNM I + II stage, and radical surgery, the positive expression of DSG1 and DSG2 proteins was higher (P < 0.05). In comparison to patients with negative DSG1 and/or DSG2 expression, the average overall survival time of those with positive expression was significantly longer (P = 0.000). Cox multivariate analysis revealed that negative DSG1 and DSG2 expressions were independent of poor prognosis factors in EHCC patients. The AUC calculated for DSG1 was 0.681 (95% confidence interval: 0.594-0.768) and that for DSG2 was 0.645 (95% confidence interval: 0.555-0.734), while that for DSG1 and DSG2 was 0.772 (95% confidence interval: 0.609-0.936).

Conclusions: Negative protein expression of DSG1 and DSG2 is closely related to the pathogenesis, severe clinicopathological characteristics, aggressive biological behaviours, and dismal prognosis in EHCC.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为预后生物标志物的DSG1和DSG2的阴性表达对肝外胆管癌患者总生存期的影响
目的:评价DSG1、DSG2在EHCC中的表达,探讨其临床病理意义。方法:采用EnVision免疫组化方法检测15例正常胆道组织、10例胆道腺瘤组织、30例肿瘤周围组织和100例EHCC肿瘤组织中DSG1和DSG2的蛋白表达。结果:DSG1、DSG2蛋白在EHCC肿瘤组织中的表达明显低于正常胆道组织、胆道腺瘤组织及瘤周组织(P < 0.05)。DSG1和/或DSG2蛋白表达阴性的腺瘤和瘤周组织表现为不典型增生。EHCC中DSG1表达与DSG2表达呈正相关(P < 0.01)。在分化良好、无侵袭、无淋巴结转移、TNM分期为I + II期、根治性手术的患者中,DSG1、DSG2蛋白阳性表达较高(P < 0.05)。与DSG1和/或DSG2阴性表达患者相比,阳性表达患者的平均总生存时间明显更长(P = 0.000)。Cox多因素分析显示,在EHCC患者中,DSG1和DSG2的阴性表达与预后不良因素无关。DSG1的AUC为0.681(95%可信区间:0.594-0.768),DSG2的AUC为0.645(95%可信区间:0.555-0.734),DSG1和DSG2的AUC为0.772(95%可信区间:0.609-0.936)。结论:DSG1和DSG2蛋白的阴性表达与EHCC的发病机制、严重的临床病理特征、侵略性的生物学行为和预后不良密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Analytical Cellular Pathology
Analytical Cellular Pathology ONCOLOGY-CELL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
70
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Analytical Cellular Pathology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for scientists, medical practitioners and pathologists working in the area of cellular pathology. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to cytology, carcinogenesis, cell receptors, biomarkers, diagnostic pathology, immunopathology, and hematology.
期刊最新文献
Shikonin Induces Autophagy and Apoptosis in Esophageal Cancer EC9706 Cells by Regulating the AMPK/mTOR/ULK Axis. Hippo Signaling Pathway in Colorectal Cancer: Modulation by Various Signals and Therapeutic Potential. Exosomal PDL1 Suppresses the Anticancer Activity of CD8+ T Cells in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. AZD8055 Is More Effective Than Rapamycin in Inhibiting Proliferation and Promoting Mitochondrial Clearance in Erythroid Differentiation. Malignant Transformation of Normal Oral Tissue to Dysplasia and Early Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An In Silico Transcriptomics Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1