The use of community advisory boards in pragmatic clinical trials: The case of the adult day services plus project.

IF 1.2 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-08-31 DOI:10.1080/01621424.2020.1816522
Keith A Anderson, Holly Dabelko-Schoeny, Sokha Koeuth, Katherine Marx, Laura N Gitlin, Joseph E Gaugler
{"title":"The use of community advisory boards in pragmatic clinical trials: The case of the adult day services plus project.","authors":"Keith A Anderson,&nbsp;Holly Dabelko-Schoeny,&nbsp;Sokha Koeuth,&nbsp;Katherine Marx,&nbsp;Laura N Gitlin,&nbsp;Joseph E Gaugler","doi":"10.1080/01621424.2020.1816522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Community advisory boards (CABs) have become increasingly common and important in translational research in health care including studies focusing on home and community-based services. CABs are composed of stakeholders who share interest in research projects and typically include patients/clients, practitioners, community members, policymakers, and researchers. CABs advise researchers on issues ranging from research design and recruitment to implementation and dissemination. In this article, the researchers detail their experiences with the CAB for a pragmatic clinical trail of Adult Day Services (ADS) Plus, an education and support intervention for family caregivers of older adults with dementia using adult day services. Lessons learned, guidelines, and best practices are then presented for developing and working with a CAB in healthcare research.</p>","PeriodicalId":45875,"journal":{"name":"HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01621424.2020.1816522","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01621424.2020.1816522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Community advisory boards (CABs) have become increasingly common and important in translational research in health care including studies focusing on home and community-based services. CABs are composed of stakeholders who share interest in research projects and typically include patients/clients, practitioners, community members, policymakers, and researchers. CABs advise researchers on issues ranging from research design and recruitment to implementation and dissemination. In this article, the researchers detail their experiences with the CAB for a pragmatic clinical trail of Adult Day Services (ADS) Plus, an education and support intervention for family caregivers of older adults with dementia using adult day services. Lessons learned, guidelines, and best practices are then presented for developing and working with a CAB in healthcare research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在实用临床试验中使用社区咨询委员会:以成人日间服务加项目为例。
社区咨询委员会(CABs)在保健转译研究中变得越来越普遍和重要,包括侧重于家庭和社区服务的研究。cab由对研究项目有共同兴趣的利益相关者组成,通常包括患者/客户、从业人员、社区成员、政策制定者和研究人员。咨询委员会就从研究设计和招聘到实施和传播等问题向研究人员提供咨询。在这篇文章中,研究人员详细介绍了他们在CAB的经验,以进行成人日间服务(ADS) Plus的实用临床试验,这是一种针对使用成人日间服务的老年痴呆患者的家庭照顾者的教育和支持干预。然后介绍了在医疗保健研究中开发和使用CAB的经验教训、指导方针和最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY
HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Home Health Care Services Quarterly continues to publish important research on the cutting edge of home care and alternatives to long-term institutional care for the elderly, disabled, and other population groups that use in-home health care and other community services. The journal is aimed toward service providers and health care specialists involved with health care financing, evaluation of services, organization of services, and public policy issues.
期刊最新文献
Elderly Health Care Voucher Scheme in Hong Kong: needs assessment and an evaluation of outcomes. Optimism and resilience among the precariat: a gendered analysis of community home-based care work in South Africa. Factors influencing interprofessional collaboration in long-term care from a multidisciplinary perspective: a case study approach. Resilience in home and community care registered practical nurses: a scoping review. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare utilization among Home Care Aides in Washington, U.S.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1