The value of the visual evoked potentials test in the assessment of the visual pathway in head trauma.

Journal of injury & violence research Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-08-15 DOI:10.5249/jivr.v13i1.1525
Pejvak Azadi, Morteza Movassat, Mohammad Hosein Khosravi
{"title":"The value of the visual evoked potentials test in the assessment of the visual pathway in head trauma.","authors":"Pejvak Azadi,&nbsp;Morteza Movassat,&nbsp;Mohammad Hosein Khosravi","doi":"10.5249/jivr.v13i1.1525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The research was done to evaluate the value of the visual evoked potentials test in the assessment of visual pathways function in cases with head trauma and minimal findings on routine testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective case series evaluating use of visual evoked potentials testing in patients with a history of head trauma and suffering from visual symptoms with no significant clinical and neuroimaging findings, referred for further work up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four patients with a history of head trauma and subsequent visual complaints were included. 27 cases (79.4%) were male and 7 cases (20.6%) were female. The mean elapsed time after the trauma was 47.6 weeks (range: 3.5 to 320 weeks). Twenty-five cases had unilateral and 9 cases had bilateral visual complaints. History of coma with mean duration of 12 days was present in 4 cases. The best-corrected visual acuity was less than 1 Log MAR (legally blind) in 21 eyes. In 4 eyes (12%) the relative afferent papillary defect test was positive. Mild to moderate optic disc pallor was present bilaterally in 4 cases and unilaterally in 3 cases. Hemorrhagic patches were reported on MRI in 2 cases; no other cases had pathologic MRI findings. In unilateral cases, there was a statistically significant difference between the involved eye-sided lobe and the sound eye-sided lobe implicit time and amplitude. In patients with bilateral complaints, by testing each eye, the VEP amplitudes of both eyes showed significant differences with the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision standards, whereas the implicit times showed not-statistically significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The visual evoked potentials test shows not only additional diagnostic value, not seen on routine clinical and neuroimaging testing, but also rather a high validity in tracing visual disability in traumatic brain injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":73795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of injury & violence research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142334/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of injury & violence research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v13i1.1525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: The research was done to evaluate the value of the visual evoked potentials test in the assessment of visual pathways function in cases with head trauma and minimal findings on routine testing.

Methods: A prospective case series evaluating use of visual evoked potentials testing in patients with a history of head trauma and suffering from visual symptoms with no significant clinical and neuroimaging findings, referred for further work up.

Results: Thirty-four patients with a history of head trauma and subsequent visual complaints were included. 27 cases (79.4%) were male and 7 cases (20.6%) were female. The mean elapsed time after the trauma was 47.6 weeks (range: 3.5 to 320 weeks). Twenty-five cases had unilateral and 9 cases had bilateral visual complaints. History of coma with mean duration of 12 days was present in 4 cases. The best-corrected visual acuity was less than 1 Log MAR (legally blind) in 21 eyes. In 4 eyes (12%) the relative afferent papillary defect test was positive. Mild to moderate optic disc pallor was present bilaterally in 4 cases and unilaterally in 3 cases. Hemorrhagic patches were reported on MRI in 2 cases; no other cases had pathologic MRI findings. In unilateral cases, there was a statistically significant difference between the involved eye-sided lobe and the sound eye-sided lobe implicit time and amplitude. In patients with bilateral complaints, by testing each eye, the VEP amplitudes of both eyes showed significant differences with the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision standards, whereas the implicit times showed not-statistically significant differences.

Conclusions: The visual evoked potentials test shows not only additional diagnostic value, not seen on routine clinical and neuroimaging testing, but also rather a high validity in tracing visual disability in traumatic brain injury.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视觉诱发电位试验在颅脑损伤视觉通路评估中的价值。
背景:本研究旨在评估视觉诱发电位试验在评估头部外伤患者视觉通路功能方面的价值,并对常规测试结果进行初步评估。方法:前瞻性病例系列评估视觉诱发电位测试在有头部外伤史和有视觉症状但无明显临床和神经影像学发现的患者中的应用,这些患者需要进一步研究。结果:34例患者均有头部外伤史并伴有视力问题。男性27例(79.4%),女性7例(20.6%)。创伤后的平均时间为47.6周(范围:3.5至320周)。单侧视力不适25例,双侧视力不适9例。4例有昏迷史,平均昏迷时间12天。21眼最佳矫正视力小于1 Log MAR(法定失明)。4眼(12%)相对传入乳头缺损试验阳性。轻度至中度视盘苍白4例为双侧,3例为单侧。2例MRI示出血性斑块;其余病例均无MRI病理表现。在单侧病例中,受累的眼侧叶与健全的眼侧叶的隐式时间和振幅有统计学意义的差异。在双侧主诉患者中,通过测试每只眼睛,双眼VEP振幅与国际临床视觉电生理学会标准有显著差异,而内隐时间差异无统计学意义。结论:视觉诱发电位试验不仅具有临床常规检查和神经影像学检查所没有的附加诊断价值,而且对外伤性脑损伤的视觉功能障碍具有较高的追踪效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A survey on occupational injuries and related factors among emergency patients of Mashhad teaching hospitals over a year. Pediatric patients with facial fractures: a retrospective study. Pediatric trauma volume fell during the initial COVID-19 wave but rebounded to new highs for the remainder of 2020. Top journals publishing articles related to drowning prevention: a bibliometric analysis 2000-2022. Characterizing long-term outcomes following AMA discharges after assault-related penetrating trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1