A lockdown index to assess the economic impact of the coronavirus.

Q1 Mathematics Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-08-28 DOI:10.1186/s41937-020-00056-8
Marius Faber, Andrea Ghisletta, Kurt Schmidheiny
{"title":"A lockdown index to assess the economic impact of the coronavirus.","authors":"Marius Faber, Andrea Ghisletta, Kurt Schmidheiny","doi":"10.1186/s41937-020-00056-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Like most countries, the Swiss government adopted drastic measures to stop the spread of the coronavirus. These measures were aimed at avoiding close physical proximity between people. The adverse economic consequences of this lockdown policy became immediately apparent, with almost two million workers, or more than every third worker in Switzerland, being put on short-time work within only 6 weeks after the policy's implementation. In an attempt to promptly assess the heterogeneous consequences of this lockdown policy, we computed a <i>lockdown index</i>. This index is based on an occupation's dependence on physical proximity to other people and corrected for certain essential sectors being exempt from this policy. We find that on average, 31% of jobs in Switzerland have been potentially restricted by the lockdown policy. This average masks considerable heterogeneity along many dimensions, with the strongest effects for the large industries hospitality, construction, and arts and entertainment. With respect to the regional variation, we find the strongest effects for the cantons of Obwalden, Uri, Appenzell Innerrhoden, and Valais. Moreover, low- and middle-income individuals are considerably more restricted than high-income ones. We do not find meaningful differences between men and women or urban and rural areas. Finally, we test the explanatory power of the lockdown index for short-time work and unemployment increases by canton and industry until the end of April 2020 and find that it can explain up to 58% of these short-term employment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":36872,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics","volume":"156 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7453704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41937-020-00056-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Like most countries, the Swiss government adopted drastic measures to stop the spread of the coronavirus. These measures were aimed at avoiding close physical proximity between people. The adverse economic consequences of this lockdown policy became immediately apparent, with almost two million workers, or more than every third worker in Switzerland, being put on short-time work within only 6 weeks after the policy's implementation. In an attempt to promptly assess the heterogeneous consequences of this lockdown policy, we computed a lockdown index. This index is based on an occupation's dependence on physical proximity to other people and corrected for certain essential sectors being exempt from this policy. We find that on average, 31% of jobs in Switzerland have been potentially restricted by the lockdown policy. This average masks considerable heterogeneity along many dimensions, with the strongest effects for the large industries hospitality, construction, and arts and entertainment. With respect to the regional variation, we find the strongest effects for the cantons of Obwalden, Uri, Appenzell Innerrhoden, and Valais. Moreover, low- and middle-income individuals are considerably more restricted than high-income ones. We do not find meaningful differences between men and women or urban and rural areas. Finally, we test the explanatory power of the lockdown index for short-time work and unemployment increases by canton and industry until the end of April 2020 and find that it can explain up to 58% of these short-term employment outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估冠状病毒经济影响的封锁指数。
与大多数国家一样,瑞士政府采取了严厉的措施来阻止冠状病毒的传播。这些措施旨在避免人与人之间的近距离接触。这一封锁政策的不利经济后果立即显现出来,在政策实施后的短短 6 周内,瑞士就有近 200 万名工人(超过三分之一的工人)被安排短期工作。为了及时评估这一停工政策的不同后果,我们计算了停工指数。该指数基于职业对与他人实际距离的依赖程度,并对某些不受该政策限制的重要部门进行了修正。我们发现,平均而言,瑞士有31%的工作可能受到封锁政策的限制。这一平均值掩盖了许多方面的差异,其中对大型行业如酒店业、建筑业以及艺术和娱乐业的影响最大。在地区差异方面,我们发现奥布瓦尔登州、乌里州、阿彭策尔内罗登州和瓦莱州受到的影响最大。此外,中低收入者比高收入者受到的限制要大得多。我们没有发现男性和女性、城市和农村地区之间存在有意义的差异。最后,我们测试了 2020 年 4 月底前各州和各行业的锁定指数对短期工作和失业增加的解释力,发现它可以解释 58% 的短期就业结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics
Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics Mathematics-Statistics and Probability
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
The macro-financial effects of Climate Policy Risk: evidence from Switzerland Inequality in opportunity of access to antenatal care in Cameroon: multilevel modelling, spatial analysis and decomposition methods Working from home is here to stay, but how does it affect workplace learning? Capturing Swiss economic confidence Capturing Swiss economic confidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1