Measuring patient safety climate in operating rooms: Validation of the Spanish version of the hospital survey on patient safety.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Services Management Research Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2020-09-09 DOI:10.1177/0951484820943598
Jose Hugo Arias Botero, Ruben Dario Gomez Arias, Angela Maria Segura Cardona, Fernando Acosta Rodriguez, Jose Antonio Quesada Rico, Vicente Gil Guillen
{"title":"Measuring patient safety climate in operating rooms: Validation of the Spanish version of the hospital survey on patient safety.","authors":"Jose Hugo Arias Botero,&nbsp;Ruben Dario Gomez Arias,&nbsp;Angela Maria Segura Cardona,&nbsp;Fernando Acosta Rodriguez,&nbsp;Jose Antonio Quesada Rico,&nbsp;Vicente Gil Guillen","doi":"10.1177/0951484820943598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The measurement of patient safety climate within hospitals, and specifically in operating rooms is a basic tool for the development of the patient's safety policy. There are no validated Spanish versions of instruments to measure safety climate. The objective of this research was to validate the Spanish version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety (HSOPS®), with the addition of a module for surgical units, to evaluate the patient safety climate in operating rooms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Survey validation study. The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety (HSOPS®) was applied to health workers from 6 acute general hospitals, from Medellín (Colombia), with surgical procedures greater than 300 per month, 18 items were added considered specific for Operating Rooms. For construct validation, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used, utilizing principal components as the extraction method. Reliability was evaluated with Cronbach's α.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 10 dimensions model was obtained with EFA, most of the dimensions of the original questionnaire were conserved, although the factorial structure was not reproduced. Two new dimensions emerged from the added items. The Cronbach's α ranged between 0.66 and 0.87. Conclusions: We found the HSOPS questionnaire is valid and reliable for measuring patient safety climate in Spanish speaking Latin American countries. Two additional dimensions are proposed for Operating Rooms.</p>","PeriodicalId":45801,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Management Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0951484820943598","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0951484820943598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The measurement of patient safety climate within hospitals, and specifically in operating rooms is a basic tool for the development of the patient's safety policy. There are no validated Spanish versions of instruments to measure safety climate. The objective of this research was to validate the Spanish version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety (HSOPS®), with the addition of a module for surgical units, to evaluate the patient safety climate in operating rooms.

Methods: Survey validation study. The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety (HSOPS®) was applied to health workers from 6 acute general hospitals, from Medellín (Colombia), with surgical procedures greater than 300 per month, 18 items were added considered specific for Operating Rooms. For construct validation, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used, utilizing principal components as the extraction method. Reliability was evaluated with Cronbach's α.

Results: A 10 dimensions model was obtained with EFA, most of the dimensions of the original questionnaire were conserved, although the factorial structure was not reproduced. Two new dimensions emerged from the added items. The Cronbach's α ranged between 0.66 and 0.87. Conclusions: We found the HSOPS questionnaire is valid and reliable for measuring patient safety climate in Spanish speaking Latin American countries. Two additional dimensions are proposed for Operating Rooms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量手术室患者安全气候:西班牙语版医院患者安全调查的验证。
目的:医院内,特别是手术室内患者安全气候的测量是制定患者安全政策的基本工具。目前还没有经过验证的西班牙语版本的测量安全气候的仪器。本研究的目的是验证西班牙版的医院患者安全调查(hops®),该调查增加了一个手术室模块,以评估手术室的患者安全环境。方法:调查验证研究。医院患者安全调查(hops®)适用于来自Medellín(哥伦比亚)的6家急症综合医院的卫生工作者,这些医院每月手术超过300例,其中增加了18项被认为是手术室专用的项目。构建验证采用探索性因子分析(EFA),以主成分为提取方法。采用Cronbach’s α评价信度。结果:EFA得到了一个10维度的模型,原始问卷的大部分维度是保守的,但因子结构没有重现。从增加的项目中出现了两个新的维度。Cronbach’s α在0.66 ~ 0.87之间。结论:我们发现hhsops问卷在拉丁美洲西班牙语国家测量患者安全气候是有效和可靠的。手术室增加了两个额外的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Management Research
Health Services Management Research HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Health Services Management Research (HSMR) is an authoritative international peer-reviewed journal which publishes theoretically and empirically rigorous research on questions of enduring interest to health-care organizations and systems throughout the world. Examining the real issues confronting health services management, it provides an independent view and cutting edge evidence-based research to guide policy-making and management decision-making. HSMR aims to be a forum serving an international community of academics and researchers on the one hand and healthcare managers, executives, policymakers and clinicians and all health professionals on the other. HSMR wants to make a substantial contribution to both research and managerial practice, with particular emphasis placed on publishing studies which offer actionable findings and on promoting knowledge mobilisation toward theoretical advances.
期刊最新文献
An exploration of factors leading to readiness for organizational health literacy change in community-based health organizations. The (very real) risk of irrelevance, and the great opportunity. Financial management, efficiency, and care quality: A systematic review in the context of Health 4.0. The impact of policy and technology infrastructure on telehealth utilization. Factors influencing use of eHealth services during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1